| Literature DB >> 30096885 |
Yan He1, Zhihong Zhang2, Liangjian Li3, Shaoqing Tang4, Jian-Li Wu5.
Abstract
Premature senescence greatly affects the yield production and the grain quality in plants, although the molecular mechanisms are largely unknown. Here, we identified a novel <span class="Species">rice premature senescence leaf 85 (psl85) mutant from <span class="Chemical">ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis of cultivar Zhongjian100 (the wild-type, WT). The psl85 mutant presented a distinct dwarfism and premature senescence leaf phenotype, starting from the seedling stage to the mature stage, with decreasing level of chlorophyll and degradation of chloroplast, declined photosynthetic capacity, increased content of malonaldehyde (MDA), upregulated expression of senescence-associated genes, and disrupted reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging system. Moreover, endogenous abscisic acid (ABA) level was significantly increased in psl85 at the late aging phase, and the detached leaves of psl85 showed more rapid chlorophyll deterioration than that of WT under ABA treatment, indicating that PSL85 was involved in ABA-induced leaf senescence. Genetic analysis revealed that the premature senescence leaf phenotype was controlled by a single recessive nuclear gene which was finally mapped in a 47 kb region on the short arm of chromosome 7, covering eight candidate open reading frames (ORFs). No similar genes controlling a premature senescence leaf phenotype have been identified in the region, and cloning and functional analysis of the gene is currently underway.Entities:
Keywords: abscisic acid; chlorophyll; premature senescence; rice; senescence-associated gene
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30096885 PMCID: PMC6122088 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19082339
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Phenotypes of wild type (WT) and psl85. (A) WT and psl85 at the tillering stage. (B) WT and psl85 seedlings at DAG15. (C) WT and psl85 at DAG30. L1, L2, and L3 indicate the top three leaves of WT and psl85. (D) Enlarged views of top three leaves of WT and psl85 in (C). (E) Internode length of the main stem at the mature stage in WT and psl85. (F,G) Longitudinal section of the third internode of WT (F) and psl85 (G) at the mature stage. Scale bar = 100 µm. (H,I) Longitudinal cell length (H) and cell width (I) of WT and psl85. Scale bar = 20 cm in (A) and scale bar = 2 cm in (B,C). Values are means ± SD (n = 3); ** indicates significance at p ≤ 0.01 and * indicates significance at p ≤ 0.05 by Student’s t test.
Figure 2Chlorophyll contents, chloroplast structures, and photosynthetic parameters in WT and psl85. (A) Chlorophyll contents of WT and psl85 at DAG15 and DAG30. BS, beginning of senescence. AS, after senescence. (B) Chlorophyll contents of the upper five leaves at DAG60. (C) Chlorophyll contents of flag leaves at the heading stage. (D–G) Photosynthetic parameters of flag leaves at the heading stage. Net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr) intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and stomatal conductance (Gs). (H–J) Ultrastructure of chloroplast in WT. (K–M) Ultrastructure of chloroplast in psl85. C, chloroplast; O, osmiophilic granule; S, starch granule; G, grana thylakoid. Values are means ± SD (n = 3); ** indicates significance at p ≤ 0.01 by Student’s t test.
Figure 3Analysis of photosynthesis-related gene expression and protein levels. (A) Expression profile of photosynthesis-related genes in flag leaves of WT and psl85 at the heading stage. (B) Coomassie brilliant blue staining of total proteins. Total proteins extracted from flag leaves of WT and psl85 at the heading stage were resolved by polyacrylamide sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and quantified by bicinchoninic acid (BCA), and the major band of the large subunit of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (RbcL) is indicated. (C) Immunoblot analysis of Lhca1, Lhca2, Lhcb2, and PsbD in the total proteins extracted from flag leaves of WT and psl85 at the heading stage. The immunoblot experiment was repeated three times, independently, and a similar result was obtained each time. Values are means ± SD (n = 3); ** indicates significance at p ≤ 0.01 and * indicates significance at p ≤ 0.05 by Student’s t test.
Figure 4Senescence-related parameters, and histochemical and TUNEL assays of WT and psl85. (A,B) Malonaldehyde (MDA) contents (A) and membrane ion leakage rates (B) of WT and psl85 at DAG15 and DAG30. BS, beginning of senescence. AS, after senescence. (C) Membrane ion leakage rates of WT and psl85 at the heading stage. (D–G) Soluble protein (SP) content (D), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (E), catalase (CAT) activity (F), and peroxidase (POD) activity (G) of WT and psl85 at the tillering stage and heading stage. TS, tillering stage; HS, heading stage. The top second leaves at the tillering stage and the fully expanded flag leaves at the heading stage were used for analysis in all experiments. Values are means ± SD (n = 3); ** indicates significance at p ≤ 0.01 and * indicates significance at p ≤ 0.05 by Student’s t test. (H) DAB assay, NBT assay, and trypan blue staining in WT and psl85 at the tillering stage. (I) TUNEL assay of WT and psl85 at the tillering stage. Blue signal represents 4′,6-diamino-phenylindole (DAPI) staining; green color represents positive result. a and b are negative controls for c and d, respectively.
Figure 5Expression of chlorophyll metabolism and senescence-associated genes. (A) Expression of CDGs (SGR and RCCR1) and SAGs (Osh36 and OsI57) in flag leaves of WT and psl85. Values are means ± SD (n = 3), ** indicates significance at p ≤ 0.01 and * indicates significance at p ≤ 0.05 by Student’s t test. (B,C) Expression of CDGs (SGR and RCCR1) and SAGs (Osh36 and OsI57) in different parts of fully expanded leaves in WT (B) and psl85 (C) at the tillering stage. T, top portion leaves; M, middle portion leaves; B, bottom portion leaves. Values are means ± SD (n = 3), different letters indicate significance at p ≤ 0.05 by Duncan’s test.
Figure 6Analysis of darkness- and ABA-induced leaf senescence. (A) Detached fully expanded leaves from WT and psl85 at the tillering stage were incubated under continuous light (H2O), darkness (H2O), and 50 µM ABA (continuous light) at 28 °C for 5 days. PT, pretreatment; Scale bar = 2 cm. (B) Chlorophyll content of the detached leaves shown in A. Values are means ± SD (n = 3); NS, no significance; ** indicates significance at p ≤ 0.01 by Student’s t test. (C) ABA content in WT and psl85 at different growth stages. (D) Expression of ABA-related genes in flag leaves from WT and psl85 at the heading stage. ** indicates significance at p ≤ 0.01 and * indicates significance at p ≤ 0.05 by Student’s t test. (E–H) Kinetic expression of two CDGs and two SAGs after treatment with 50 µm ABA. Values are means ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 7Fine mapping of the PSL85 gene and expression analysis of candidate genes. (A–C) Fine mapping of the PSL85 gene. (D) Expression level analysis of candidate genes in flag leaves from WT and psl85 at the heading stage. Values are means ± SD (n = 3); ** indicates significance at p ≤ 0.01 and * indicates significance at p ≤ 0.05 by Student’s t test.
Function annotation of the candidate genes.
| ORF | Gene ID | Annotation |
|---|---|---|
| ORF1 | LOC_Os07g10610 | Expressed protein |
| ORF2 | LOC_Os07g10620 | Expressed protein |
| ORF3 | LOC_Os07g10630 | Expressed protein |
| ORF4 | LOC_Os07g10640 | Hypothetical protein |
| ORF5 | LOC_Os07g10650 | Hypothetical protein |
| ORF6 | LOC_Os07g10660 | Ribosomal protein, putative, expressed |
| ORF7 | LOC_Os07g10670 | Expressed protein |
| ORF8 | LOC_Os07g10680 | Polygalacturonase, putative, expressed |