Literature DB >> 30096490

The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.

Thomas Koelewijn1, Adriana A Zekveld2, Thomas Lunner3, Sophia E Kramer2.   

Abstract

Listening to speech in noise can be effortful but when motivated people seem to be more persevering. Previous research showed effects of monetary reward on autonomic responses like cardiovascular reactivity and pupil dilation while participants processed auditory information. The current study examined the effects of monetary reward on the processing of speech in noise and related listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response. Twenty-four participants (median age 21 yrs) performed two speech reception threshold (SRT) tasks, one tracking 50% correct (hard) and one tracking 85% correct (easy), both of which they listened to and repeated sentences uttered by a female talker. The sentences were presented with a single male talker or, in a control condition, in quiet. Participants were told that they could earn a high (5 euros) or low (0.20 euro) reward when repeating 70% or more of the sentences correctly. Conditions were presented in a blocked fashion and during each trial, pupil diameter was recorded. At the end of each block, participants rated the effort they had experienced, their performance, and their tendency to quit listening. Additionally, participants performed a working memory capacity task and filled in a need-for-recovery questionnaire as these tap into factors that influence the pupil dilation response. The results showed no effect of reward on speech perception performance as reflected by the SRT. The peak pupil dilation showed a significantly larger response for high than for low reward, for the easy and hard conditions, but not the control condition. Higher need for recovery was associated with a higher subjective tendency to quit listening. Consistent with the Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening, we conclude that listening effort as reflected by the peak pupil dilation is sensitive to the amount of monetary reward.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Listening effort; Monetary reward; Need for recovery; Pupil response; Speech reception

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30096490     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  8 in total

1.  Cognitive and Physiological Measures of Listening Effort During Degraded Speech Perception: Relating Dual-Task and Pupillometry Paradigms.

Authors:  Sarah Colby; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 2.674

2.  Comparing methods of analysis in pupillometry: application to the assessment of listening effort in hearing-impaired patients.

Authors:  Lou Seropian; Mathieu Ferschneider; Fanny Cholvy; Christophe Micheyl; Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Annie Moulin
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-03

3.  Pupillometry Assessment of Speech Recognition and Listening Experience in Adult Cochlear Implant Patients.

Authors:  Francesca Yoshie Russo; Michel Hoen; Chadlia Karoui; Thomas Demarcy; Marine Ardoint; Maria-Pia Tuset; Daniele De Seta; Olivier Sterkers; Ghizlène Lahlou; Isabelle Mosnier
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Quantifying the Effects of Motivation on Listening Effort: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Peter J Carolan; Antje Heinrich; Kevin J Munro; Rebecca E Millman
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Objective speech intelligibility prediction using a deep learning model with continuous speech-evoked cortical auditory responses.

Authors:  Youngmin Na; Hyosung Joo; Le Thi Trang; Luong Do Anh Quan; Jihwan Woo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 5.152

6.  Reward Enhances Online Participants' Engagement With a Demanding Auditory Task.

Authors:  Roberta Bianco; Gordon Mills; Mathilde de Kerangal; Stuart Rosen; Maria Chait
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Dopamine and reward hypersensitivity in Parkinson's disease with impulse control disorder.

Authors:  Daniel S Drew; Kinan Muhammed; Fahd Baig; Mark Kelly; Youssuf Saleh; Nagaraja Sarangmat; David Okai; Michele Hu; Sanjay Manohar; Masud Husain
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Three New Outcome Measures That Tap Into Cognitive Processes Required for Real-Life Communication.

Authors:  Thomas Lunner; Emina Alickovic; Carina Graversen; Elaine Hoi Ning Ng; Dorothea Wendt; Gitte Keidser
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.