Literature DB >> 30096329

Improving STD service delivery: Would American patients and providers use self-tests for gonorrhea and chlamydia?

William S Pearson1, Kristen Kreisel2, Thomas A Peterman2, Maria Zlotorzynska3, Patricia J Dittus2, Melissa A Habel4, John R Papp2.   

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhea (GC) are the most frequently reported notifiable diseases in the United States and costs for diagnosis and treatment of these two infections are approximately $700 million per year. A proposed new method for screening for these two infections is self-tests; similar to at-home pregnancy and HIV tests which do not include sending collected specimens to a laboratory for diagnosis. However, no such self-tests for sexually transmitted diseases (STD) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). To determine the acceptability of such a test, we used three surveys, conducted in 2017, including the American Men's Internet Survey, the SummerStyles survey, and the DocStyles survey to ask potential users about their interest in this type of test and how they might use it. Among our sampled population of men who have sex with men, 79.5% said they would prefer to take this type of test at home and 73.9% said they would be willing to pay at least $20 for the test. Among young adults (18-29 years), 54.1% indicated that they would like to take this test at home and 64.5% were willing to pay more than $10 for such a test. Among sampled physicians, 85.1% were "likely" or "very likely" to use an FDA-approved STD self-test in their office to screen for CT or GC. Self-tests for STDs are on our horizon and we need to be prepared to integrate these tests into our healthcare systems. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chlamydia; Gonorrhea; Self-test; Service delivery; Sexually transmitted disease

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30096329     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  11 in total

1.  "We are looking at the future right now": community acceptability of a home-based viral load test device in the context of HIV cure-related research with analytical treatment interruptions in the United States.

Authors:  Karine Dubé; John Kanazawa; Christopher Roebuck; Steven Johnson; William B Carter; Lynda Dee; Beth Peterson; Kenneth M Lynn; Linden Lalley-Chareczko; Emily Hiserodt; Sukyung Kim; Daniel Rosenbloom; Brad R Evans; Melanie Anderson; Daria J Hazuda; Lisa Shipley; Kevin Bateman; Bonnie J Howell; Karam Mounzer; Pablo Tebas; Luis J Montaner
Journal:  HIV Res Clin Pract       Date:  2022-03-29

Review 2.  Bridging the gap between development of point-of-care nucleic acid testing and patient care for sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Kuangwen Hsieh; Johan H Melendez; Charlotte A Gaydos; Tza-Huei Wang
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 7.517

3.  Attitudes and Preferences Regarding the Use of Rapid Self-Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections and HIV in San Diego Area Men Who Have Sex With Men.

Authors:  Teresa A Cushman; Susannah K Graves; Susan J Little
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.835

4.  Acceptability and Feasibility of Self-Collecting Biological Specimens for HIV, Sexually Transmitted Infection, and Adherence Testing Among High-Risk Populations (Project Caboodle!): Protocol for an Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Akshay Sharma; Rob Stephenson; Gregory Sallabank; Leland Merrill; Stephen Sullivan; Monica Gandhi
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2019-05-02

5.  Self care interventions for sexual and reproductive health and rights: costs, benefits, and financing.

Authors:  Michelle Remme; Manjulaa Narasimhan; David Wilson; Moazzam Ali; Lavanya Vijayasingham; Fatima Ghani; Pascale Allotey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-04-01

6.  'To be on the safe side': a qualitative study regarding users' beliefs and experiences of internet-based self-sampling for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae testing.

Authors:  Maria Grandahl; Margareta Larsson; Björn Herrmann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Preliminary Acceptability of a Home-Based Peripheral Blood Collection Device for Viral Load Testing in the Context of Analytical Treatment Interruptions in HIV Cure Trials: Results from a Nationwide Survey in the United States.

Authors:  Karine Dubé; Shadi Eskaf; Elizabeth Hastie; Harsh Agarwal; Laney Henley; Christopher Roebuck; William B Carter; Lynda Dee; Jeff Taylor; Derrick Mapp; Danielle M Campbell; Thomas J Villa; Beth Peterson; Kenneth M Lynn; Linden Lalley-Chareczko; Emily Hiserodt; Sukyung Kim; Daniel Rosenbloom; Brad R Evans; Melanie Anderson; Daria J Hazuda; Lisa Shipley; Kevin Bateman; Bonnie J Howell; Karam Mounzer; Pablo Tebas; Luis J Montaner
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-07

8.  Study Evaluating Self-Collected Specimen Return for HIV, Bacterial STI, and Potential Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Adherence Testing Among Sexual Minority Men in the United States.

Authors:  Akshay Sharma; Monica Gandhi; Gregory Sallabank; Leland Merrill; Rob Stephenson
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug

9.  Perceptions and Experiences of Returning Self-collected Specimens for HIV, Bacterial STI and Potential PrEP Adherence Testing among Sexual Minority Men in the United States.

Authors:  Akshay Sharma; Monica Gandhi; Gregory Sallabank; Leland Merrill; Rob Stephenson
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2022-09-12

10.  Willingness to Use Home Collection Methods to Provide Specimens for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Research: Survey Study.

Authors:  Eric William Hall; Nicole Luisi; Maria Zlotorzynska; Gretchen Wilde; Patrick Sullivan; Travis Sanchez; Heather Bradley; Aaron J Siegler
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.