Literature DB >> 30096052

Managing inappropriate utilization of laboratory resources.

Janne Cadamuro1, Mercedes Ibarz2, Michael Cornes3, Mads Nybo4, Elisabeth Haschke-Becher5, Alexander von Meyer6, Giuseppe Lippi7, Ana-Maria Simundic8.   

Abstract

Background The inappropriate use of laboratory resources, due to excessive number of tests not really necessary for patient care or by failure to order the appropriate diagnostic test, may lead to wrong, missed or delayed diagnosis, thus potentially jeopardizing patient safety. It is estimated that 5-95% of tests are currently used inappropriately, depending on the appropriateness criteria, thus significantly contributing to the potential of generating medical errors, the third leading cause of death in the US. Content In this review, we discuss the reasons as well as the medical and financial consequences of inappropriate utilization of laboratory tests. We then provide demand management (DM) tools as a means for overcoming this issue and also discuss their benefits, challenges, limitations and requirements for successful implementation. Summary and outlook When based on current evidence, adapted to local conditions and developed in close collaboration with clinicians, DM is a reasonable strategy for progressing toward better management of over- and underuse of laboratory resources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  inappropriateness of laboratory utilization; overutilization; postanalytics; preanalytics; test demand management

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30096052     DOI: 10.1515/dx-2018-0029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagnosis (Berl)        ISSN: 2194-802X


  6 in total

Review 1.  Bringing the clinical laboratory into the strategy to advance diagnostic excellence.

Authors:  Ira M Lubin; J Rex Astles; Shahram Shahangian; Bereneice Madison; Ritchard Parry; Robert L Schmidt; Matthew L Rubinstein
Journal:  Diagnosis (Berl)       Date:  2021-01-06

2.  Self-reported test ordering practices among Canadian internal medicine physicians and trainees: a multicenter cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Thomas Bodley; Janice L Kwan; John Matelski; Patrick J Darragh; Peter Cram
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 3.  Errors within the total laboratory testing process, from test selection to medical decision-making - A review of causes, consequences, surveillance and solutions.

Authors:  Cornelia Mrazek; Giuseppe Lippi; Martin H Keppel; Thomas K Felder; Hannes Oberkofler; Elisabeth Haschke-Becher; Janne Cadamuro
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

4.  Patient harm associated with serial phlebotomy and blood waste in the intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Thomas Bodley; Maverick Chan; Olga Levi; Lauren Clarfield; Drake Yip; Orla Smith; Jan O Friedrich; Lisa K Hicks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effectiveness of minimum retesting intervals in managing repetitive laboratory testing: experience from a Croatian university hospital.

Authors:  Ivana Lapić; Dunja Rogić; Mirjana Fuček; Ružica Galović
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.313

Review 6.  Laboratory Demand Management Strategies-An Overview.

Authors:  Cornelia Mrazek; Elisabeth Haschke-Becher; Thomas K Felder; Martin H Keppel; Hannes Oberkofler; Janne Cadamuro
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.