Literature DB >> 30095760

Maternal and Fetal Risk Associated With Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Jennifer F Kawwass1, Martina L Badell.   

Abstract

Infertility is a disease that affects up to 15.5% of reproductive-aged couples. Until the birth of the first neonate born from in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 1978, many infertile couples did not have an opportunity to conceive a biological child. Over the past 40 years, access to and effectiveness of IVF have increased; currently 1.7% of births in the United States result from IVF. As with any medical intervention, potential risk exists. In the case of IVF, both maternal risks (ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval, and subsequent pregnancy) and fetal risks that vary based on maternal age and fetal number must be considered. Importantly, risk quantification varies by comparison group, which is typically either spontaneous conception in a fertile couple or assisted non-IVF conception in an infertile couple. It must also be considered compared with the alternative of not undergoing IVF, which may mean not having a biological child. Although increased compared with spontaneous conception, absolute maternal-fetal-assisted reproductive technology risks are low and can be minimized by optimizing ovarian stimulation and transferring a single embryo. In this article, we aim to summarize maternal and fetal risk associated with use of assisted reproductive technology. The review focuses on ovarian stimulation and procedural risks as well as adverse perinatal outcomes among resultant singleton and twin pregnancies in young women and women of advanced maternal age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30095760     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  18 in total

Review 1.  Genetics and Epigenetics of Infertility and Treatments on Outcomes.

Authors:  Margareta D Pisarska; Jessica L Chan; Kate Lawrenson; Tania L Gonzalez; Erica T Wang
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Ante-natal counseling in phacomatoses.

Authors:  Dana Brabbing-Goldstein; Shay Ben-Shachar
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  Imaging of complications following treatment with assisted reproductive technology: keep on your radar at each step.

Authors:  Sitthipong Srisajjakul; Patcharin Prapaisilp; Sirikan Bangchokdee
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-09-18

4.  The Maternal-Neonatal Outcomes of Twin Pregnancies with Preeclampsia and Their Association with Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Huanrong Li; Meilu Lyu; Ruqian Zhao; Yuqin Zang; Pengzhu Huang; Jie Li; Ye Yan; Yingmei Wang; Zengyan Li; Cha Han; Fengxia Xue
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27

5.  Association of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Phenotypes With Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes After In-Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.

Authors:  Qiumin Wang; Honghong Wang; Ping Li; Xiufang Li; Ze Wang; Lei Yan; Yuhua Shi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 6.055

6.  The live birth and neonatal outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy among patients with adverse pregnancy outcomes in first frozen embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Jianghui Li; Jiaying Lin; Mingru Yin; Qianqian Zhu; Yanping Kuang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Risk Factors for Different Types of Pregnancy Losses: Analysis of 15,210 Pregnancies After Embryo Transfer.

Authors:  Ai-Min Yang; Xiuhua Xu; Yan Han; Jian-Jun Wei; Gui-Min Hao; Na Cui; Zhi-Ming Zhao; Wei Wang; Xianghua Huang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  Mothers who have given birth at an advanced age - health status before and after childbirth.

Authors:  Malin Lindell Pettersson; Elizabeth Nedstrand; Marie Bladh; Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Claudia Lampic; Gunilla Sydsjö
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Multiple Gestations and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Qualitative Study of the Discourse of Health Professionals in Spain.

Authors:  Estefanía Jurado-García; Alicia Botello-Hermosa; Francisco Javier Fernández-Carrasco; Juan Gómez-Salgado; Nazaret Navas-Rojano; Rosa Casado-Mejía
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects in a Chinese birth cohort study.

Authors:  Hong Lv; Feiyang Diao; Jiangbo Du; Ting Chen; Qingxia Meng; Xiufeng Ling; Hong Li; Ci Song; Qi Xi; Yangqian Jiang; Yan Xu; Shiyao Tao; Lei Huang; Mingyang Wen; Meijuan Peng; Cong Liu; Qun Lu; Yuanlin He; Yin Yin; Xiaoyu Liu; Bo Xu; Xiumei Han; Kun Zhou; Tao Jiang; Yang Zhao; Hongxia Ma; Guangfu Jin; Yankai Xia; Jiayin Liu; Yuan Lin; Zhibin Hu; Hongbing Shen
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2021-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.