Literature DB >> 30095603

Prospective Evaluation of XEN Gel Implant in Eyes With Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma.

Kaweh Mansouri1,2, Kevin Gillmann1, Harsha L Rao3, Jacopo Guidotti1, André Mermoud1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The main purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of XEN gel implant surgery in patients with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEXG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).
SETTING: This was a prospective, interventional study in a tertiary glaucoma center.
METHODS: Fifty-seven eyes (43 patients) with POAG and 53 eyes (42 patients) with PEXG with uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) despite medical treatment underwent combined XEN+cataract surgery or standalone XEN surgery. Mean IOP, mean number of medications at 1-year follow-up, needling rates, and incidence of adverse effects (AEs) were analyzed. Complete success, defined as an IOP <16 mm Hg without medications at 1 year, was also analyzed.
RESULTS: Combined XEN+cataract surgery was performed in 72% of POAG and 75% of PEXG eyes (P=0.674), the remainder underwent standalone XEN surgery. Patient characteristics were similar between the 2 groups except for higher age for the PEXG patients (78.5±8.5 vs. 71.3± 8.7 y; P<0.001). Mean medicated IOP was 19.8±5.8 (POAG) and 19.7±8.2 (PEXG) at baseline (P=0.98) and 13.9±4.6 (-29.8%) and 13.6±4.3 mm Hg (-31%) at 1 year (P=0.87), respectively (P<0.01). Mean medications dropped from 1.9±1.6 (POAG) and 2.0±1.3 (PEXG) preoperatively to 0.4±0.8 and 0.5±0.8, respectively at 1 year (P<0.001). A total of 42% (POAG) and 63% (PEXG) eyes achieved complete success (P=0.06) at 1 year. Needling was performed in 36.8% (POAG) versus 37.7% (PEXG) (P=0.923).
CONCLUSIONS: The XEN gel implant as a standalone or combined procedure demonstrated similar efficacy and safety results in PEXG and POAG eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30095603     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  15 in total

1.  XEN Gel Stent to Treat ICE Syndrome: 4 Cases.

Authors:  Michael M Lin; William H Morgan; Natasha N Kolomeyer; Stephen J Moster; Cindy X Zheng; Antonio Giubilato; Marlene R Moster
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Two-year results of a multicenter study of the ab interno gelatin implant in medically uncontrolled primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Herbert Reitsamer; Chelvin Sng; Vanessa Vera; Markus Lenzhofer; Keith Barton; Ingeborg Stalmans
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  One-year outcomes of microshunt implantation in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma.

Authors:  Matthias Nobl; Sigrid Freissinger; Stefan Kassumeh; Siegfried Priglinger; Marc J Mackert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  24-month outcomes of XEN45 gel implant versus trabeculectomy in primary glaucoma.

Authors:  Boonsong Wanichwecharungruang; Nitee Ratprasatporn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Prospective Studies of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgeries: Systematic Review and Quality Assessment.

Authors:  Jullia A Rosdahl; Divakar Gupta
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-24

6.  Learning Curve and One-Year Outcome of XEN 45 Gel Stent Implantation in a Swedish Population.

Authors:  Tobias Busch; Dragana Skiljic; Thiemo Rudolph; Anders Bergström; Madeleine Zetterberg
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-02

7.  The Outcomes of XEN Gel Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xuan-Zhu Chen; Zhi-Qiao Liang; Kang-Yi Yang; Kun Lv; Yao Ma; Meng-Yang Li; Hui-Juan Wu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-04

8.  Outcomes of XEN45 gel stent using posterior small incision sub-tenon ab interno insertion (Semi-open) technique.

Authors:  Yu Xiang George Kong; In Young Chung; Ghee Soon Ang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.456

9.  Comparing Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes following XEN® 45 and XEN® 63 Device Implantation.

Authors:  Aitor Fernández-García; Ying Zhou; Mercedes García-Alonso; Henry D Andrango; Francisco Poyales; Nuria Garzón
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Needling and open filtering bleb revision after XEN-45 implantation-a retrospective outcome comparison.

Authors:  Stefan Steiner; Hemma Resch; Barbara Kiss; Daniel Buda; Clemens Vass
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.