Literature DB >> 30095038

Biobanks and the Moral Concerns of Donors: A Democratic Deliberation.

Raymond G De Vries1, Kerry A Ryan1, Linda Gordon2, Chris D Krenz1, Tom Tomlinson2, Scott Jewell3, Scott Y H Kim4.   

Abstract

Do members of the public believe that biobanks should accommodate the moral concerns of donors about the types of research done with their biospecimens? The answer to this question is critical to the future of genomic and precision medicine, endeavors that rely on a public willing to share their biospecimens and medical data. To explore public attitudes regarding the requirements of consent for biobank donations, we organized three democratic deliberations involving 180 participants. The deliberative sessions involved small group discussions informed by presentations given by experts in both biobank research and ethics. We found that participants had a sophisticated understanding of the ethical problems of biobank consent and the complexity of balancing donor concerns while promoting research important to the future of health care. Our research shows how deliberative methods can offer policy makers creative ideas for accommodating the moral concerns of donors in the biobank consent process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  United States; biobanking; communication; community and public health; democratic deliberation; education; ethics; genetics; health; moral perspectives; patient; qualitative; social participation; sociology; technology; trust; use in research

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30095038     DOI: 10.1177/1049732318791826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  5 in total

1.  Effect of Public Deliberation on Patient Attitudes Regarding Consent and Data Use in a Learning Health Care System for Oncology.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Kent A Griffith; Rochelle D Jones; Chris Krenz; Michele Gornick; Rebecca Spence; Raymond De Vries; Sarah T Hawley; Robin Zon; Sage Bolte; Navid Sadeghi; Richard L Schilsky; Angela R Bradbury
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Building trust in research through information and intent transparency with health information: representative cross-sectional survey of 502 US adults.

Authors:  Sabrina Mangal; Leslie Park; Meghan Reading Turchioe; Jacky Choi; Stephanie Niño de Rivera; Annie Myers; Parag Goyal; Lydia Dugdale; Ruth Masterson Creber
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 7.942

Review 3.  Governing Personalized Health: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Philipp Trein; Joël Wagner
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Qualitative Data Sharing: Participant Understanding, Motivation, and Consent.

Authors:  Alicia VandeVusse; Jennifer Mueller; Sebastian Karcher
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2021-12-01

5.  «If you give them your little finger, they'll tear off your entire arm»: losing trust in biobank research.

Authors:  Lars Ursin; Borgunn Ytterhus; Erik Christensen; John-Arne Skolbekken
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2020-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.