Eric A Miller1, Paul F Pinsky2, Dudith Pierre-Victor2. 1. Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. Eric.Miller2@nih.gov. 2. Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Men with diabetes have been found to have a reduced risk of prostate cancer (PCa), potentially due to detection bias from lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels or inhibition of tumor growth. Understanding if lower PCa rates are due to a lower risk of the disease or a detection bias from PSA testing can help inform the benefits and harms from prostate cancer screening. METHODS: We used data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Screening Trial to assess the impact of PSA screening on PCa in men with diabetes and the potential role of detection bias and/or slower tumor growth. Comparing men by diabetes status, we calculated age-adjusted incidence rates by tumor grade and compared screening results, PSA levels, and tumor characteristics. RESULTS: Men with diabetes had lower rates of PCa but was limited to low- and intermediate-grade tumors. Men with diabetes were less likely to be biopsied after their first positive screening test and men diagnosed with low/intermediate-grade tumors had significantly more advanced tumors with higher PSA levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide additional evidence that detection bias is likely contributing to the lower rates of low- and intermediate-grade prostate cancers.
PURPOSE:Men with diabetes have been found to have a reduced risk of prostate cancer (PCa), potentially due to detection bias from lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels or inhibition of tumor growth. Understanding if lower PCa rates are due to a lower risk of the disease or a detection bias from PSA testing can help inform the benefits and harms from prostate cancer screening. METHODS: We used data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Screening Trial to assess the impact of PSA screening on PCa in men with diabetes and the potential role of detection bias and/or slower tumor growth. Comparing men by diabetes status, we calculated age-adjusted incidence rates by tumor grade and compared screening results, PSA levels, and tumor characteristics. RESULTS:Men with diabetes had lower rates of PCa but was limited to low- and intermediate-grade tumors. Men with diabetes were less likely to be biopsied after their first positive screening test and men diagnosed with low/intermediate-grade tumors had significantly more advanced tumors with higher PSA levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide additional evidence that detection bias is likely contributing to the lower rates of low- and intermediate-grade prostate cancers.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diabetes; Prostate cancer screening; Prostate-specific antigen
Authors: Julie A Bytnar; Jie Lin; Brett J Theeler; Ann I Scher; Craig D Shriver; Kangmin Zhu Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 2.532
Authors: Kerri Beckmann; Danielle Crawley; Tobias Nordström; Markus Aly; Henrik Olsson; Anna Lantz; Noor Binti Abd Jalal; Hans Garmo; Jan Adolfsson; Martin Eklund; Mieke Van Hemelrijck Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-11-01
Authors: Sonia Kelkar; Taofik Oyekunle; Adva Eisenberg; Lauren Howard; William J Aronson; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Matthew R Cooperberg; Zachary Klaassen; Martha K Terris; Stephen J Freedland; Ilona Csizmadi Journal: JNCI Cancer Spectr Date: 2021-03-09
Authors: Xiaoshuang Feng; Mingyang Song; Mark A Preston; Wenjie Ma; Yang Hu; Claire H Pernar; Konrad H Stopsack; Ericka M Ebot; Benjamin C Fu; Yiwen Zhang; Ni Li; Min Dai; Lydia Liu; Edward L Giovannucci; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Eleanor L Watts; Georgina K Fensom; Karl Smith Byrne; Aurora Perez-Cornago; Naomi E Allen; Anika Knuppel; Marc J Gunter; Michael V Holmes; Richard M Martin; Neil Murphy; Konstantinos K Tsilidis; Bu B Yeap; Timothy J Key; Ruth C Travis Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2020-12-11 Impact factor: 7.316