Nancy Downs1, Elyse Galles2, Brian Skehan3, Sarah Ketchen Lipson4. 1. Department of Psychiatry, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. ndowns@ucsd.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, USA. 4. Department of Health Law Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MI, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review and synthesize the previous, current, and proposed models of care in college mental health in order to identify best practices that will address the mental health needs of today's students. To highlight data that supports existing or proposed models and describe areas where more data is needed. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite the potentially appealing attributes of integrated care, empirical evidence supporting these systems and structures in campus settings is mixed. Recent surveys show less than half of campuses have an integrated mental health care model. Overall, there is only partial consensus on optimal models of campus mental health care. Mental health needs in college student populations are greater and more complex than ever. While the resources available are vast and varied, there is limited evidence to support which models and programs can best meet students' needs.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review and synthesize the previous, current, and proposed models of care in college mental health in order to identify best practices that will address the mental health needs of today's students. To highlight data that supports existing or proposed models and describe areas where more data is needed. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite the potentially appealing attributes of integrated care, empirical evidence supporting these systems and structures in campus settings is mixed. Recent surveys show less than half of campuses have an integrated mental health care model. Overall, there is only partial consensus on optimal models of campus mental health care. Mental health needs in college student populations are greater and more complex than ever. While the resources available are vast and varied, there is limited evidence to support which models and programs can best meet students' needs.
Keywords:
Collaborative care; College mental health; Models of care; Psychiatric treatment
Authors: Benjamin D Locke; Kathleen J Bieschke; Louis G Castonguay; Jeffrey A Hayes Journal: Harv Rev Psychiatry Date: 2012 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Henry Chung; Michael C Klein; Daniel Silverman; Janet Corson-Rikert; Eleanor Davidson; Patricia Ellis; Caroline Kasnakian Journal: J Am Coll Health Date: 2011
Authors: Sarah Ketchen Lipson; Nicole Speer; Steven Brunwasser; Elisabeth Hahn; Daniel Eisenberg Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2014-07-16 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Carlos Blanco; Mayumi Okuda; Crystal Wright; Deborah S Hasin; Bridget F Grant; Shang-Min Liu; Mark Olfson Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2008-12
Authors: Peter A Wyman; C Hendricks Brown; Jeff Inman; Wendi Cross; Karen Schmeelk-Cone; Jing Guo; Juan B Pena Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2008-02
Authors: Marcia R Morris; Nora I Feldpausch; Melissa G Inga Eshelman; Bettina U Bohle-Frankel Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2019-10-19 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Kiera Louise Adams; Kate E Saunders; Charles Donald George Keown-Stoneman; Anne C Duffy Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 2.692