| Literature DB >> 30093866 |
Monica Maijo1, Kamal Ivory1, Sarah J Clements1, Jack R Dainty2, Amy Jennings2, Rachel Gillings2, Susan Fairweather-Tait2, Massimo Gulisano3, Aurelia Santoro4,5, Claudio Franceschi5, Simon R Carding1,2, Claudio Nicoletti1,3.
Abstract
Amongst the major features of aging are chronic low grade inflammation and a decline in immune function. The Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) is considered to be a valuable tool to improve health status, and although beneficial effects have been reported, to date, immunological outcomes have not been extensively studied. We aimed to test the hypothesis that 1 year of a tailored intervention based on the MedDiet with vitamin D (10 μg/day) would improve innate immune responses in healthy elderly subjects (65-79 years) from the English cohort (272 subjects recruited) of the NU-AGE randomized, controlled study (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01754012). Of the 272 subjects forming the United Kingdom cohort a subgroup of 122 subjects (61 in the intervention group and 61 in the control group) was used to evaluate ex vivo innate immune response, phenotype of circulating immune cells, and levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory markers. Odds Ratio (OR) was calculated for all the parameters analyzed. After adjustment by gender, MedDiet-females with a BMI < 31 kg/m2 had a significant upregulation of circulating CD40+CD86+ cells (OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.01-11.75, P = 0.0437). Furthermore, in all MedDiet subjects, regardless of gender, we observed a MedDiet-dependent changes, although not statistically significant of immune-critical parameters including T cell degranulation, cytokine production and co-receptor expression. Overall, our study showed that adherence to an individually tailored Mediterranean-like dietary pattern with a daily low dose of vitamin D3 supplements for 1 year modified a large variety of parameters of immune function in healthy, elderly subjects. We interpreted these data as showing that the MedDiet in later life could improve aspects of innate immunity and thus it could aid the design of strategies to counteract age-associated disturbances. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01754012.Entities:
Keywords: NU-AGE; aging; dietary intervention; elderly; inflammation; nutrition
Year: 2018 PMID: 30093866 PMCID: PMC6070774 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00997
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Quantitative dietary guidelines given to study participants.
| Food group | Quantity required in dietary intervention |
|---|---|
| Whole grains | 6 servings per day; 1 serving = 25 g bread, 50 g breakfast cereal |
| Fruits | 2 servings per day; 1 serving = 1 apple, 1 banana, 8 small plums |
| Vegetables and legumes | 330 g per day, once per week 200 g legumes |
| Dairy and cheese | 500 ml dairy per day (of which 30 g cheese) |
| Fish and other seafood | 2 times per week; 1 portion = 125 g |
| Meat and poultry | 4 times per week; 1 portion = 125 g |
| Nuts | 2 times per week; 20 g portion |
| Potatoes, pasta and rice | 150 g per day; 80 g (raw weight) whole grain rice or pasta at least twice a week |
| Eggs | 2–4 times per week |
| Oil or fat | 20 g oil per day, 30 g margarine per day; maximum of 50 g fat per day. Should be olive oil and low fat margarine rich in MUFA and PUFA |
| Alcohol | Maximum of 1–2 glasses per day for men, and 1 glass per day for women. Preferably red wine, if not abstain |
| Fluid | 1.5 liter per day, including milk |
| Salt | Reduce added salt, and intake of ready meals (soups, gravy, and sauce) |
| Sugar | Limit consumption of sugar and sweetened drinks (replace with fruit or yogurt, no/reduce sugar in tea or coffee). |
Physical features of the study participants.
| Characteristics | Control | MedDiet | All subjects |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 70.63 ± 3.77 | 69.97 ± 4.20 | 70.27 ± 4.02 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) baseline | 26.9 ± 3.3 | 26.4 ± 4.5 | 26.7 ± 4.0 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) final | 26.7 ± 3.5 | 26.2 ± 4.4 | 26.4 ± 4.1 |
| Women % | 63.0 | 58.2 | 60.4 |
| Pre-frail % | 18.5 | 19.5 | 19 |
Effects of MedDiet on the expression of co-stimulatory molecules.
| Phenotype | OR (95%Cl) | |
|---|---|---|
| CD154 | 0.84 (0.36–1.99) | 0.6953 |
| CD80 | 1.10 (0.50–2.41) | 0.8053 |
| CD86 | 1.07 (0.36–3.16) | 0.9005 |
| HLA-Dr | 0.43 (0.18–1.06) | 0.0655 |
| CD40 | 0.92 (0.41–2.06) | 0.8404 |
| CD152 | 1.04 (0.45–2.37) | 0.9313 |
| CD1d | 1.18 (0.52–2.69) | 0.6859 |
Effects of MedDiet on in vitro production of cytokines.
| Cytokine | OR (95%Cl) | |
|---|---|---|
| IFNα | 1.49 (0.54–4.11) | 0.4415 |
| IFNβ | 1.98 (0.86–4.53) | 0.1056 |
| IFNγ | 1.19 (0.51–2.75) | 0.6854 |
| IL-12p40 | 0.84 (0.38–1.83) | 0.6582 |
| IL-12p70 | 1.62 (0.74–3.52) | 0.2228 |
| IL-12p40/IL-12p70 | 0.54 (0.26–1.16) | 0.1122 |
| IL-12Rβ1 | 0.50 (0.22–1.13) | 0.0929 |
| IL-12Rβ2 | 1.04 (0.40–2.66) | 0.9396 |
| SOCS3 | 0.50 (0.21–1.18) | 0.1108 |
Effects of MedDiet on T cell proliferation, CD8 T cell degranulation and granulocyte oxidative burst activity.
| Phenotype | OR (95%Cl) | |
|---|---|---|
| T Cell proliferation (G2 + M Phase) | 0.67 (0.27–1.65) | 0.3817 |
| % CD8 T cell degranulation | 2.13 (0.77–5.91) | 0.1396 |
| Oxidative burst test (GeoMean) | 2.03 (0.53–7.70) | 0.2922 |
Effects of MedDiet on co-stimulatory Molecules.
| Phenotype | OR (95%Cl) | |
|---|---|---|
| CD28 | 1.03 (0.47–2.26) | 0.9387 |
| KIR2DL4 (CD158) | 1.14 (0.53–2.45) | 0.7443 |
| CD161 | 1.09 (0.26–4.59) | 0.9116 |
| TCRVα24-Jα18 (NKT) | 0.91 (0.38–2.17) | 0.8352 |
Effects of MedDiet on plasma levels of regulatory cytokines.
| Cytokine | OR (95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| IL-2 | 0.87 (0.40–1.86) | 0.7133 |
| IL-9 | – | – |
| IL-22 | 0.66 (0.28–1.55) | 0.3427 |
| IL-23 | – | – |