Comparison of ELISA and Urine Microscopy for Diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium Infection.

BACKGROUND: Schistosoma haematobium which causes urogenital schistosomiasis (UGS) is highly prevalent in African countries. Urine microscopy (UM) is the first-line diagnostic method of UGS. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a common method for screening many parasite infections primarily or alternatively. The present study established an in-house diagnostic system by ELISA and evaluated its diagnostic efficacy in comparison with UM for screening UGS in White Nile State, Republic of Sudan, 2011-2013.
METHODS: A total of 490 participants were screened by UM or ELISA, and 149 by both. The in-house ELISA system was established employing soluble egg antigen of S. haematobium and the cut-off absorbance was set at 0.270.
RESULTS: Of the 149 subjects, 58 participants (38.9%) were positive by UM, 119 (79.9%) were positive by ELISA and 82 (55.0%) showed consistently positive or negative results by both methods. The diagnostic sensitivity of ELISA was 94.8% and specificity was 29.7% based on UM results. The ELISA positive serum samples also cross-reacted with egg antigens of Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma japonicum.
CONCLUSION: We have established in-house ELISA for screening serum immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibodies by employing soluble egg antigen of S. haematobium for diagnosis of UGS with 94.8% sensitivity and 29.7% specificity. The ELISA system can supplement the conventional diagnosis by UM.

INTRODUCTION

Schistosomiasis is the most prevalent trematodiasis globally, caused by blood flukes of the genus Schistosoma. In particular, Schistosoma haematobium causes urogenital schistosomiasis (UGS) widely in Africa by worms residing in the venous plexus of the urinary bladder and its eggs deposited in the bladder wall.1 Sudan is an endemic area of UGS where the White Nile and Blue Nile rivers meet. In Sudan, there are several known hyperendemic locations of UGS.234 Previous studies have shown that the prevalence of S. haematobium in White Nile State, Sudan remained high, with 45.5% in 2010,4 28.5% in 2012,5 and 14.0% in 2014.6

As schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease (NTD) of global importance, it is one of target NTDs for global elimination programs. The elimination programs of NTDs must be supported by mass diagnostic screening and preventive chemotherapy. Therefore, it is important to implement accessible and inexpensive mass diagnostic screening test with high sensitivity. Urine microscopy (UM) to detect and count the eggs of S. haematobium has been used widely as a standard diagnostic test of UGS because it is easy and cheap to perform in remote endemic areas. However, the eggs are not regularly passed through the urine because the eggs are released only when the infected blood vessels rupture into the bladder lumen. Therefore, UM used to underestimate UGS prevalence especially in detecting light infections.7 In this context, additional methods are applied together to improve the diagnosis of UGS such as ultrasonography,6 dipstick for hematuria,89 and serology.8910

In the present study, we applied enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for diagnosis of UGS by detecting the serum immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibodies reacting to soluble egg antigen of S. haematobium as well as UM. Our study aimed to establish the criteria of ELISA diagnosis and to compare diagnostic values of UM and ELISA for UGS.

METHODS

Study area and population

The materials were collected from 2011 to 2013 in 7 villages of the White Nile State, Republic of Sudan (Fig. 1). The 7 villages included Abu Sharif, Al Hideb, Al Jabalain, Al Zelit, Azhari, Campo, and Khor Ajwal. The subjects collected in 2013 for this study were also included partially in another study for diagnosis of UGS by ultrasonography.6

Fig. 1

Location of White Nile State in Sudan. The red-colored area on the left indicates White Nile State in Sudan, the White Nile River is crossing the whole state from south to north.

Urine microscopy

For diagnosis of UGS, urine samples were collected and transferred to the laboratory of the White Nile NTD Elimination Center. The urine samples were adjusted into 10 mL and centrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 5 minutes at room temperature. The pellets were transferred on 2–4 slide glasses and eggs of S. haematobium were counted by trained technicians under a light microscopy.

Antibody test to Schistosoma antigens by ELISA

Serum samples were also collected and screened for specific IgG antibodies by ELISA. Soluble egg antigens of S. haematobium and Schistosoma mansoni were supplied by the Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (Cairo, Egypt). Schistosoma japonicum soluble egg antigen was obtained from Jiangxi Institute of Parasitic Disease, Nanchang, China. The in-house ELISA system was established at the serology laboratory of the Institute of Endemic Disease, Seoul National University for serologic diagnosis of the samples. The conventional ELISA was implicated following the method described by Jin et al.11 All ELISA reactions were duplicated and the mean absorbance was used.

Statistical analysis

The ELISA absorbance between groups with different UM results was compared by Student's t-test. The correlation between egg counts and ELISA absorbance and between ELISA absorbance measured with different egg antigens were analyzed by Pearson's correlation analysis and simple linear regression analysis. Comparison of positive tests by UM and ELISA was analyzed by McNemar test. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and a P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethics statement

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Korea Association of Health Promotion (approval No. 10-C-05). The survey was conducted after informed verbal consent was obtained from the chief of the villages, school teachers and individuals or their parents if subjects were children. The research program was approved by Ministry of Health, White Nile State, Sudan.

RESULTS

Study population

A total of 920 participants were subjected and 490 were examined by either UM for egg detection or ELISA for specific serum IgG antibody. Among them, 149 participants were examined by both UM and ELISA, and only their findings were analyzed in this study (Fig. 2). By age, 127 (85.2%) were under 16 years of age which mainly include schoolchildren group. By sex, 31 (20.8%) were women, 86 (57.7%) were men, and rest of them were unknown.

Fig. 2

Inclusion and exclusion of total participants for UM and ELISA.

UM = urine microscopy, ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Of the 149 urine samples examined, total 58 (38.9%) were positive for S. haematobium eggs by UM (Table 1). The egg counts ranged from 0 to 70/10 mL urine, and the overall mean egg counts was 6.1/10 mL urine. Among the egg-positive groups, only 3 participants were classified as heavy infection (≥ 50 eggs/10 mL urine). As shown in Table 2, age groups from 10 to 19 comprised the highest proportion of egg positive by UM.

Table 1

Comparison of positive tests by UM and ELISA for S. haematobium

ELISA	UM
	Positive	Negative	Total
Positive	55 (94.8)	64 (70.3)	119 (79.9)
Negative	3 (5.2)	27 (29.7)	30 (20.1)
Total	58 (100)	91 (100)	149 (100)

Values are presented as number of cases (%).

UM = urine microscopy, ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Table 2

Positive rates of S. haematobium infection by UM and ELISA in age groups

Age group, yr	No. of examination	No. (%) of UM positive	No. (%) of ELISA positive	No. (%) of both UM and ELISA positive
5–9	38	14 (36.8)	28 (73.7)	13 (34.2)
10–14	84	33 (39.3)	74 (88.1)	33 (39.3)
15–19	9	6 (66.7)	8 (88.9)	5 (55.6)
≥20	14	3 (21.4)	5 (35.7)	2 (14.3)
Unknown	4	2 (50.0)	4 (100.0)	2 (50.0)
Total	149	58 (38.9)	119 (81.2)	55 (36.9)

UM = urine microscopy, ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

ELISA

The ELISA using soluble egg antigen of S. haematobium screened serum samples of 3 groups to set the cut-off absorbance (Fig. 3). Absorbance of the 50 negative control serum samples from Koreans was 0.011–0.170 with mean 0.042 ± 0.035 standard deviation (SD) while that was 0.009–0.880 with 0.426 ± 0.248 (P < 0.001) among 91 egg negative cases in Sudan and 0.107–0.980 with 0.582 ± 0.194 (P < 0.001) among 58 egg positive cases in Sudan. The absorbance values between the egg negative and positive groups were significantly different (P < 0.001). The cut-off value was set using the serum samples from Koreans. Since these samples were obtained from non-endemic area, their absorbance was a reference as negative control. The cut-off value should be set above its mean +3 SD, > 0.148. However, to exclude the highest absorbance 0.170 in the control group, the cut-off value had to be greater than 0.170. Then, maximization of the Youden index (sensitivity + specificity −1) was achieved with cut-off value at 0.510, but the sensitivity was severely compromised to 70.7% with the value. As the serologic test is designed to be applied as a screening test, the sensitivity is required to be high enough.12 Among cut-off values showing sensitivity higher than 90.0%, 0.270 was set for the cut-off value to maximize the Youden index. Based on this cut-off, a total of 119 participants (79.9%) were positive when tested with ELISA by serum antibody (Table 1).

Fig. 3

ELISA absorbance of 3 different groups; negative control samples, egg-negative cases in Sudan, egg-positive cases in Sudan. The cut-off value for ELISA absorbance (0.270) is indicated with horizontal line.

ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, SEA = soluble egg antigen.

Comparison of UM and ELISA findings

Among the 149 subjects who underwent both UM and ELISA, 82 participants showed consistent results in both methods. Among the 149 subjects of the present study, prevalence of UGS was 38.9% by UM and 79.9% by ELISA. Since the UM is the diagnostic standard, the diagnostic sensitivity of ELISA was 94.8% (confidence interval [CI], 85.6%–98.9%) and specificity was 29.7% (CI, 20.6%–40.2%; Fig. 3 and Table 1). There was significant disagreement between UM and ELISA (P < 0.001 by McNemar test; Table 1), and the overall prevalence among participants was much higher when evaluated by ELISA (79.9%) than by UM (38.9%). When the amount of egg counts of egg-positive group was compared with that of ELISA absorbance, there was no significant correlation between the two variables (P = 0.138, R2 = 0.0389; Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

Correlation between egg counts of egg positive group and their ELISA absorbance reacted with soluble egg antigen of S. haematobium.

ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, SEA = soluble egg antigen.

Cross-reactions with antigens of other schistosomes

The ELISA screened 179 of the 490 serum samples with soluble egg antigen of S. mansoni and 172 samples with antigen of S. japonicum. When the same cut-off value of 0.270 was used with S. mansoni antigen, 133 of the 179 samples reacted with antigens of both S. haematobium and S. mansoni (Fig. 5). When the same cut-off value was set for S. japonicum antigen, 32 of 172 serum samples reacted with both S. haematobium and S. japonicum antigen. The ELISA reaction of S. haematobium was significantly correlated with that of both S. mansoni (R2 = 0.7150) and S. japonicum (R2 = 0.1372).

Fig. 5

Correlation between ELISA absorbance of samples reacted with soluble egg antigens of S. haematobium and (A) S. mansoni or (B) S. japonicum.

ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

DISCUSSION

The present sensitivity of ELISA was high enough to apply this method practically to screen egg positive subjects. In this context, the optimum cut-off value should include as many egg-positive samples while excluding as many egg-negative samples. To achieve this, cut-off value is usually adjusted to maximize Youden index, but this strategy has limitations by giving equal weight on sensitivity and specificity, which is not optimal in a condition of relatively low prevalence and higher cost of false-negative test results than that of false-positive test results.13 Therefore, the cut-off value was selected among values with sensitivity higher than 90.0%. As a result, the absorbance of 0.270 was set as the cut-off value for positive criteria (Fig. 3), which meant samples with ELISA absorbance higher than 0.270 were counted positive by our in-house serology system. Although distribution of the ELISA absorbance values was significantly different between the UM negative and positive groups (P < 0.001), the cut-off value of 0.270 should be reset with more number of positive and negative samples due to high rate of irrelevance between the two methods (Fig. 3 and Table 2).

In spite of high sensitivity, three were false ELISA negatives among 58 egg positives. One of the three had 0.231 of S. haematobium ELISA absorbance and adjusting the cut-off value to 0.230 could increase sensitivity to 96.6% but it also impaired the specificity to 26.4%. The rest two had 0.135 and 0.107 of S. haematobium ELISA absorbance but had 0.244 and 0.233 absorbance to S. mansoni antigen respectively. The absorbance to S. mansoni antigen was higher than that to S. haematobium, but significance of the difference is unclear. Immune status or other factors must be further investigated in these false negative subjects by ELISA.

The sensitivity and specificity of ELISA can be influenced by types of antigen utilized. One study recognized that ELISA using worm antigen of S. mansoni could screen UGS by detecting serum IgG antibodies but its sensitivity was not high.8 Instead, the ELISA detecting serum IgM antibodies against egg antigens showed high sensitivity but low specificity.910 It is hard to directly compare the serology findings between IgG or IgM antibodies, but our ELISA detecting serum IgG antibodies against egg antigens demonstrated similarly high sensitivity and low specificity. Since host immune response mainly targets the egg antigen rather than the worm-derived antigen, it is reasonable to employ soluble egg antigen for ELISA evaluation.

The specificity of ELISA was only 29.7%, and 64 subjects (70.3%) in UM negative group were found to be positive by ELISA. These subjects may be false positive cases of cured UGS, true infected with negative eggs by UM at the collection time, or false positive by cross-reaction.14 Chemotherapy with praziquantel may kill adult flukes but the eggs deposited in the bladder wall or in other tissues can sustain longer. Because several mass drug administration (MDA) programs have been implemented in Sudan, the cured subjects are diagnosed as false positive by ELISA due to sustaining eggs in the tissue and long-lasting residual antibodies in the serum. When the subjects were divided by age group, the proportion of ELISA positive in UM negative group reached 100% and 80.4% in the age group of 15–19 year and 10–14 year, respectively. Because these age groups are major targets of several school-based MDA programs, most-reaction by S. mansoni infection or other multi-parasitism. All of the 3 possible factors might have contributed the low specificity of ELISA in the present study.

One important factor to consider for ELISA diagnosis is cross-reaction. Serum IgG antibodies to other helminth antigens may falsely react to the egg antigen of S. haematobium and the antibodies to S. haematobium cross-react with antigens of other helminths. Indeed, significant correlation between ELISA results using antigens from different schistosome species (Fig. 5) infers the S. haematobium infected serum frequently cross-reacted with the soluble egg antigens of S. mansoni and S. japonicum. The cross-reaction between S. haematobium and S. mansoni was also recognized in other studies.810 On the other hand, there is a chance of true multiple infections because mixed infections with S. mansoni and S. haematobium were reported in the study site of Sudan.45 However, most positive reactions against S. mansoni antigen must have been contributed by cross-reaction because S. mansoni prevalence is very low. Similarly, the ELISA positivity to S. japonicum mostly resulted from cross-reaction because the species is distributed only in Asia. This extraordinary frequency of cross-reaction within the Schistosoma species must be concerned for developing and interpreting ELISA diagnosis of schistosomiais.

In addition, we should consider temporal changes of ELISA results in response to the infection and treatment. Since the ELISA employed soluble egg antigen, certain amounts of accumulated eggs in the bladder wall or other tissues are required for the ELISA positive reaction. During the initial infection, the infected subjects can show negative results by ELISA until enough numbers of eggs accumulate in the bladder wall. During the treatment, the eggs in the tissue can last for a long period of several years even after cure by medication. A multiplex bead assay for serodiagnosis of S. mansoni infection in Kenya reported high positivity to soluble egg antigen among children and unchanged positivity for 3 years after medication.15 During a certain period after medication, the ELISA diagnosis can lead to false positive results according to the disease nature of UGS.

Soluble egg antigens can be prepared from different isolates of S. haematobium. The present study used soluble egg antigen derived from Egyptian isolate of S. haematobium. It is unknown whether there is any inter-isolate difference of egg antigens by locality between Sudan and Egypt or other areas. The antigenic characteristics of soluble egg antigen of S. haematobium must be specified in the near future according to geographical distribution and species of Schistosoma.

The present study has several limitations. The sample size was small due to many lost subjects for the tests and the subjects were not sampled by statistical design. It was impossible to prepare the gold standard by UM because the samples were collected once. For further evaluation of diagnostic efficacy of UM and ELISA, collection of whole day urine or more repeated collections on successive days should be considered.

In conclusion, we have established in-house ELISA with cut-off absorbance 0.270 for screening serum IgG antibodies by employing soluble egg antigen of S. haematobium for diagnosis of UGS. Diagnostic sensitivity of the ELISA was 94.8% and specificity was 29.7%. The ELISA diagnosis can supplement the conventional diagnosis of UGS by UM.