| Literature DB >> 30093819 |
Hitomi Araki1, Ken Ing Cherng Ong1, Lavy Lorphachan2, Pheovaly Soundala2, Moritoshi Iwagami3, Akira Shibanuma1, Bouasy Hongvanthong4, Paul T Brey2, Shigeyuki Kano3, Masamine Jimba1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Opisthorchis viverrini (Ov) infection is one of the foodborne trematodiases, which is highly endemic in Lao People's Democratic Republic (PDR). The infection occurs especially when people eat raw fish containing Ov metacercariae. As eating raw fish is a traditional culture in Lao PDR, changing this behavior is difficult. A new approach is necessary to control Ov infection because people easily get re-infected even after taking praziquantel unless they change their behaviors. This study aimed to explore factors associated with Ov infection among children and to identify the existing behaviors and perception that might contribute to the control of Ov infection in Lao PDR. We conducted a cross-sectional study in Yommalath district, Khammouane province, in Lao PDR in August and September 2015. In this cross-sectional study, we used a semi-structured questionnaire and interviewed 348 mothers who had a child aged 5-15 years. We also collected the fecal samples from each mother-child pair and used the Kato-Katz method (three slides/sample) to detect Ov eggs.Entities:
Keywords: Behavior; Children; Cross-sectional study; Mothers; Opisthorchis viverrini
Year: 2018 PMID: 30093819 PMCID: PMC6081849 DOI: 10.1186/s41182-018-0112-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Med Health ISSN: 1348-8945
Characteristics of the mothers and comparison by children’s Ov status (n = 284)
| Children’s Ov status | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative, | Positive, | ||||||
| Children’s sex | |||||||
| Male | 158 | (55.6) | 23 | (14.6) | 135 | (85.4) | 0.178 |
| Female | 126 | (44.4) | 26 | (20.6) | 100 | (79.4) | |
| Ethnicity | |||||||
| Lao-Tai | 228 | (80.3) | 42 | (18.4) | 186 | (81.6) | 0.331† |
| Mon-Khmer | 56 | (19.7) | 7 | (12.5) | 49 | (87.5) | |
| Education level of mother | |||||||
| Illiterate/no schooling | 105 | (37.0) | 16 | (15.2) | 89 | (84.8) | 0.168† |
| Primary | 149 | (52.5) | 24 | (16.1) | 125 | (83.9) | |
| Secondary | 30 | (10.6) | 9 | (30.0) | 21 | (70.0) | |
| Marital status | |||||||
| Married | 266 | (93.7) | 48 | (18.1) | 218 | (82.0) | 0.346† |
| Widowed | 11 | (3.9) | 0 | (0.0) | 11 | (100.0) | |
| Divorced | 7 | (2.5) | 1 | (14.3) | 6 | (85.7) | |
| Religion | |||||||
| Buddhist | 186 | (65.5) | 38 | (20.4) | 148 | (79.6) | 0.005 |
| Animist | 98 | (34.5) | 11 | (11.2) | 87 | (88.8) | |
| Occupation | |||||||
| Rice farmer | 276 | (97.2) | 45 | (16.3) | 231 | (83.7) | 0.032† |
| Other* | 8 | (2.8) | 4 | (50.0) | 4 | (50.0) | |
| Toilet mainly used | |||||||
| No facility | 122 | (43.0) | 14 | (11.5) | 108 | (88.5) | 0.007 |
| Pit latrine | 111 | (39.1) | 19 | (17.1) | 92 | (82.9) | |
| Flush | 51 | (18.0) | 16 | (31.4) | 35 | (68.6) | |
Total may not become 100% due to rounding off
†Fisher’s exact test
*Teacher/civil servant (n = 4), no occupation (n = 3), trade/business (n = 1)
Ov-infected children by age and sex (n = 284)
| Total ( | Ov positive | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total ( | Male ( | Female ( | |||||||
| Age of children, mean (SD) | 10.0 | (3.4) | 10.2 | (3.4) | 9.7 | (3.3) | 10.8 | (3.3) | 0.032* |
| Age group, | 0.345** | ||||||||
| 5 years | 33 | (11.6) | 25 | (75.8) | 16 | (80.0) | 9 | (69.2) | |
| 6–10 years | 126 | (44.4) | 101 | (80.2) | 63 | (84.0) | 38 | (74.5) | |
| 11–14 years | 87 | (30.6) | 75 | (86.2) | 40 | (88.9) | 35 | (83.3) | |
| 15 years | 38 | (13.4) | 34 | (89.5) | 16 | (88.9) | 18 | (90.0) | |
| Total | 284 | (100.0) | 235 | (82.8) | 135 | (85.4) | 100 | (79.4) | |
*Comparing the mean age of children by children’s Ov status
**Comparing the children’s Ov status by age group
Factors associated with children’s Ov status (n = 284)
| OR | 95% CI | AOR | 95% CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Children’s sex | ||||||
| Male (ref) | ||||||
| Female | 0.76 | (0.43–1.34) | 0.345 | 0.47 | (0.21–1.05) | 0.065 |
| Age of child | 1.11 | (1.01–1.22) | 0.034 | 1.08 | (0.94–1.24) | 0.258 |
| Age of mother | 1.06 | (1.02–1.10) | 0.004 | 1.05 | (0.99–1.11) | 0.083 |
| Ethnicity | ||||||
| Lao-Tai (ref) | ||||||
| Mon-Khmer | 1.58 | (0.67–3.73) | 0.297 | 0.64 | (0.05–7.54) | 0.724 |
| Education status of mother | ||||||
| No schooling/illiterate (ref) | ||||||
| Primary | 0.94 | (0.47–1.86) | 0.851 | 2.05 | (0.84–5.03) | 0.115 |
| Secondary | 0.42 | (0.16–1.08) | 0.072 | 1.31 | (0.38–4.48) | 0.668 |
| Wealth index | ||||||
| Poorest (ref) | ||||||
| Poorer | 0.48 | (0.13–1.70) | 0.255 | 1.16 | (0.25–5.51) | 0.849 |
| Middle | 0.33 | (0.10–1.08) | 0.066 | 0.73 | (0.17–3.20) | 0.675 |
| Richer | 0.60 | (0.17–2.11) | 0.424 | 1.37 | (0.28–6.80) | 0.701 |
| Richest | 0.22 | (0.07–0.72) | 0.012 | 0.73 | (0.13–3.96) | 0.715 |
| Main fuel | ||||||
| Wood (ref) | ||||||
| Charcoal/coal/lignite | 0.39 | (0.21–0.73) | 0.003 | 0.58 | (0.23–1.45) | 0.242 |
| Main toilet | ||||||
| No facility (ref) | ||||||
| Pit latrine | 0.63 | (0.30–1.32) | 0.220 | 1.12 | (0.40–3.10) | 0.828 |
| Flush | 0.28 | (0.13–0.64) | 0.002 | 0.66 | (0.20–2.16) | 0.493 |
| Mother likes raw fish | ||||||
| No (ref) | ||||||
| Yes | 2.95 | (1.47–5.95) | 0.002 | 2.47 | (1.07–5.69) | 0.033 |
| Mothers’ Ov status | ||||||
| Negative (ref) | ||||||
| Positive | 5.77 | (2.25–14.77) | < 0.001 | 10.45 | (3.13–34.86) | < 0.001 |
Fig. 1Parents’ cooking responsibility (n = 284)
Fig. 2Mothers’ perception on the minimum age to start feeding or eating raw fish (n = 284)
Fig. 3Information source of Ov (n = 284, multiple answers except for never get information)