Literature DB >> 30093534

Dissociation of LFP Power and Tuning in the Frontal Cortex during Memory.

Charles D Holmes1,2, Charalampos Papadimitriou3, Lawrence H Snyder3,2.   

Abstract

Working memory, the ability to maintain and manipulate information in the brain, is critical for cognition. During the memory period of spatial memory tasks, neurons in the prefrontal cortex code for memorized locations via persistent, spatially tuned increases in activity. Local field potentials (LFPs) are understood to reflect summed synaptic activity of local neuron populations and may offer a window into network-level processing. We recorded LFPs from areas 8A and 9/46 while two male cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) performed a long duration (5.1-15.6 s) memory-guided saccade task. Greater than ∼16 Hz, LFP power was contralaterally tuned throughout the memory period. Yet power for both contralateral and ipsilateral targets fell gradually after the first second of the memory period, dropping below baseline after a few seconds. Our results dissociate absolute LFP power from mnemonic tuning and are consistent with modeling work that suggests that decreasing synchronization within a network may improve the stability of memory coding.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The frontal cortex is an important site for working memory. There, individual neurons reflect memorized information with selective increases in activity, but how collections of neurons work together to achieve memory is not well understood. In this work, we examined rhythmic electrical activity surrounding these neurons, which may reflect the operation of recurrent circuitry that could underlie memory. This rhythmic activity was spatially tuned with respect to memorized locations as long as memory was tested (∼7.5 s). Surprisingly, however, the overall magnitude of rhythmic activity decreased steadily over this period, dropping below baseline levels after a few seconds. These findings suggest that collections of neurons may actively desynchronize to promote stability in memory circuitry.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/388177-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  frontal eye fields; local field potential; macaque; prefrontal cortex; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30093534      PMCID: PMC6146495          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3629-17.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  28 in total

1.  Oscillations in the alpha band (9-12 Hz) increase with memory load during retention in a short-term memory task.

Authors:  Ole Jensen; Jack Gelfand; John Kounios; John E Lisman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Stimulus Load and Oscillatory Activity in Higher Cortex.

Authors:  Simon Kornblith; Timothy J Buschman; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  The prefrontal cortex: comparative architectonic organization in the human and the macaque monkey brains.

Authors:  Michael Petrides; Francesco Tomaiuolo; Edward H Yeterian; Deepak N Pandya
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 4.  Mechanisms of gamma oscillations.

Authors:  György Buzsáki; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  NMDA receptors subserve persistent neuronal firing during working memory in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Min Wang; Yang Yang; Ching-Jung Wang; Nao J Gamo; Lu E Jin; James A Mazer; John H Morrison; Xiao-Jing Wang; Amy F T Arnsten
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations.

Authors:  Marlene R Cohen; Adam Kohn
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Bump attractor dynamics in prefrontal cortex explains behavioral precision in spatial working memory.

Authors:  Klaus Wimmer; Duane Q Nykamp; Christos Constantinidis; Albert Compte
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Gamma and Beta Bursts Underlie Working Memory.

Authors:  Mikael Lundqvist; Jonas Rose; Pawel Herman; Scott L Brincat; Timothy J Buschman; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Gamma oscillations correlate with working memory load in humans.

Authors:  Marc W Howard; Daniel S Rizzuto; Jeremy B Caplan; Joseph R Madsen; John Lisman; Richard Aschenbrenner-Scheibe; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Sharp emergence of feature-selective sustained activity along the dorsal visual pathway.

Authors:  Diego Mendoza-Halliday; Santiago Torres; Julio C Martinez-Trujillo
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  7 in total

1.  Local field potentials reflect cortical population dynamics in a region-specific and frequency-dependent manner.

Authors:  Cecilia Gallego-Carracedo; Matthew G Perich; Raeed H Chowdhury; Lee E Miller; Juan Álvaro Gallego
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Working Memory: From Neural Activity to the Sentient Mind.

Authors:  Russell J Jaffe; Christos Constantinidis
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 8.915

3.  Primate Spatial Memory Cells Become Tuned Early and Lose Tuning at Cell-Specific Times.

Authors:  Charalampos Papadimitriou; Charles D Holmes; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.861

Review 4.  Multi-scale neural decoding and analysis.

Authors:  Hung-Yun Lu; Elizabeth S Lorenc; Hanlin Zhu; Justin Kilmarx; James Sulzer; Chong Xie; Philippe N Tobler; Andrew J Watrous; Amy L Orsborn; Jarrod Lewis-Peacock; Samantha R Santacruz
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Low-beta repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during object recognition memory sample presentation, at a task-related frequency observed in local field potentials in homologous macaque cortex, impairs subsequent recollection but not familiarity.

Authors:  Zhemeng Wu; Martina Kavanova; Lydia Hickman; Erica A Boschin; Juan M Galeazzi; Lennart Verhagen; Matthew Ainsworth; Carlos Pedreira; Mark J Buckley
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.698

6.  Plasticity after cognitive training reflected in prefrontal local field potentials.

Authors:  Balbir Singh; Zhengyang Wang; Xue-Lian Qi; Christos Constantinidis
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-08-12

7.  Rhythmicity of Prefrontal Local Field Potentials after Nucleus Basalis Stimulation.

Authors:  Balbir Singh; Xue-Lian Qi; David T Blake; Christos Constantinidis
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-02-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.