Rafael Alvarez1, Alfor G Lewis2, Mouhamadoul H Toure2, Randy J Seeley2. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: rafalv@med.umich.edu. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) is fashioned in humans by applying multiple staple loads, rodent VSG is generally created through a single-staple load application. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of a 2-staple load VSG rat model more closely resembling the multistaple load operation done in humans on weight, metabolic outcomes, and the microbiome and how these compare with those obtained with the standard one-staple load model. SETTING: University research facility, United States. METHODS: High-fat diet-induced obese male rats were randomized to single-staple load VSG (VSG1), 2-staple load VSG (VSG2), or sham operation (Sham). Outcomes included weight and composition, food intake, glucose metabolism, lipids, bile acids, and intestinal microbiome. Statistical comparisons were performed using analysis of variance. RESULTS: Both procedures resulted in substantial weight and body fat loss compared with Sham-treated animals. Weight loss was modestly greater for VSG2 compared with VSG1. Food intake was reduced in both procedures and accounted for the observed weight reduction. Glucose tolerance and plasma and hepatic lipid profiles were improved comparably in VSG1 and VSG2 relative to Sham. Bile acids were higher for VSG2 compared with Sham but not significantly different between VSG1 and VSG2. Neither procedure impacted intestinal microbiome richness and diversity compared with Sham across multiple intestinal sections. Colonic Actinobacteria was more abundant in VSG2 than in Sham. Relative abundances of bacterial phyla did not differ among VSG1, VSG2, and Sham across the remaining intestinal sections. CONCLUSIONS: Although VSG1 or VSG2 offer effective and overall comparable platforms for the study of obesity, VSG2 resulted in superior weight loss.
BACKGROUND: Although vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) is fashioned in humans by applying multiple staple loads, rodent VSG is generally created through a single-staple load application. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of a 2-staple load VSG rat model more closely resembling the multistaple load operation done in humans on weight, metabolic outcomes, and the microbiome and how these compare with those obtained with the standard one-staple load model. SETTING: University research facility, United States. METHODS: High-fat diet-induced obese malerats were randomized to single-staple load VSG (VSG1), 2-staple load VSG (VSG2), or sham operation (Sham). Outcomes included weight and composition, food intake, glucose metabolism, lipids, bile acids, and intestinal microbiome. Statistical comparisons were performed using analysis of variance. RESULTS: Both procedures resulted in substantial weight and body fat loss compared with Sham-treated animals. Weight loss was modestly greater for VSG2 compared with VSG1. Food intake was reduced in both procedures and accounted for the observed weight reduction. Glucose tolerance and plasma and hepatic lipid profiles were improved comparably in VSG1 and VSG2 relative to Sham. Bile acids were higher for VSG2 compared with Sham but not significantly different between VSG1 and VSG2. Neither procedure impacted intestinal microbiome richness and diversity compared with Sham across multiple intestinal sections. Colonic Actinobacteria was more abundant in VSG2 than in Sham. Relative abundances of bacterial phyla did not differ among VSG1, VSG2, and Sham across the remaining intestinal sections. CONCLUSIONS: Although VSG1 or VSG2 offer effective and overall comparable platforms for the study of obesity, VSG2 resulted in superior weight loss.
Authors: Antonio Iannelli; Anne Sophie Schneck; Patrick Noel; Imed Ben Amor; Daniel Krawczykowski; Jean Gugenheim Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Anne K McGavigan; Darline Garibay; Zachariah M Henseler; Jack Chen; Ahmed Bettaieb; Fawaz G Haj; Ruth E Ley; Michael L Chouinard; Bethany P Cummings Journal: Gut Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Margaret A Stefater; Diego Pérez-Tilve; Adam P Chambers; Hilary E Wilson-Pérez; Darleen A Sandoval; José Berger; Mouhamadoul Toure; Matthias Tschöp; Stephen C Woods; Randy J Seeley Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Antje Damms-Machado; Suparna Mitra; Asja E Schollenberger; Klaus Michael Kramer; Tobias Meile; Alfred Königsrainer; Daniel H Huson; Stephan C Bischoff Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-02-01 Impact factor: 3.411