Literature DB >> 30093238

Acceptance rate and sociological factors involved in the switch from originator to biosimilar etanercept (SB4).

Marc Scherlinger1, Emmanuel Langlois2, Vincent Germain3, Thierry Schaeverbeke3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study acceptance rate and factors influencing acceptance of the switch from originator etanercept (Enbrel©) to biosimilar etanercept (SB4, Bénépali©) in patients with rheumatic disease.
METHODS: Patients with a well-controlled rheumatic disease consulting in our rheumatology department were offered the switch for SB4. After oral and written information concerning biosimilar, free choice to accept the switch was left to the patients. The main outcome was primary switch acceptance rate defined by switch acceptance during the initial consult. Real switch adherence, socio-cultural factors and beliefs influencing switch acceptance rate were retrieved during a telephonic interview at distance from the consultation.
RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were eligible for the switch: 32 (62%) with spondyloarthritis and 20 (38%) with rheumatoid arthritis. The primary acceptance rate was 92% (48/52). Patients refusing the switch were more likely to report a bad opinion on generic drugs (100% vs 11%, p < 0.001). Other patient characteristics were roughly identical except for a statistical trend in the refusal group toward older age (61.4vs 50.7years, p = 0.08) and longer disease duration (26vs 12.1years, p = 0.05). Despite initial acceptance, two patients did not begin SB4 after receiving negative information by their regular pharmacist. Real SB4 switch rate was 85% (44/52) and 86% (38/44) of patients reported a good experience of the switch.
CONCLUSIONS: Acceptance rate of the switch from originator to biosimilar etanercept is high. Patient information, physician and pharmacist knowledge on biosimilars should be taken into account in order to improve their diffusion.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-TNF; DMARDs (biologic); Patient perspective; Rheumatoid arthritis; Spondyloarthritis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30093238     DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0049-0172            Impact factor:   5.532


  23 in total

1.  [Biosimilars and the nocebo effect].

Authors:  J Braun; S Tsiami; B Buehring; D Kiefer; I Andreica; X Baraliakos; U Kiltz
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  A bio-what? Medical companions' perceptions towards biosimilars and information needs in rheumatology.

Authors:  Chiara Gasteiger; Urte Scholz; Keith J Petrie; Nicola Dalbeth
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.580

3.  Patient satisfaction survey: substitution of reference etanercept with a biosimilar product.

Authors:  Cristina Martínez-Múgica Barbosa; Belén Rodríguez de Castro; Yoar Labeaga Beramendi; Paloma Terroba Alonso; Javier Barbazán Vázquez
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2019-09-04

4.  Randomised, double-blind, phase III study comparing the infliximab biosimilar, PF-06438179/GP1111, with reference infliximab: efficacy, safety and immunogenicity from week 30 to week 54.

Authors:  Rieke Alten; Bogdan Batko; Tomas Hala; Hideto Kameda; Sebastiao C Radominski; Vira Tseluyko; Goran Babic; Carol Cronenberger; Sarah Hackley; Muhammad Rehman; Oliver von Richter; Min Zhang; Stanley Cohen
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2019-03-28

5.  Does a mandatory non-medical switch from originator to biosimilar etanercept lead to increase in healthcare use and costs? A Danish register-based study of patients with inflammatory arthritis.

Authors:  Bente Glintborg; Rikke Ibsen; Rebecca Elisabeth Qwist Bilbo; Merete Lund Hetland; Jakob Kjellberg
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2019-08-12

6.  Batch-to-Batch Consistency of SB4 and SB2, Etanercept and Infliximab Biosimilars.

Authors:  Hans C Ebbers; Bjørn Fehrmann; Mette Ottosen; Niels Hvorslev; Pia Høier; Jae-Woong Hwang; Jinhan Chung; Hyoung Taek Lim; Shinjung Lee; Juyoung Hong; Mourad Farouk Rezk
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 7.  Real-World Patient Experience of Switching Biologic Treatment in Inflammatory Arthritis and Ulcerative Colitis - A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Karin Luttropp; Johan Dalén; Axel Svedbom; Mary Dozier; Christopher M Black; Amy Puenpatom
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 8.  Treatment journey in rheumatoid arthritis with biosimilars: from better access to good disease control through cost savings and prevention of nocebo effects.

Authors:  Josef S Smolen; Roberto Caporali; Thomas Doerner; Bruno Fautrel; Fabrizio Benedetti; Burkhard Pieper; Minjun Jang
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2021-06

Review 9.  Real-World Evidence on Etanercept Biosimilar SB4 in Etanercept-Naïve or Switching Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hans C Ebbers; Burkhard Pieper; Amine Issa; Janet Addison; Ulrich Freudensprung; Mourad F Rezk
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2019-08-05

Review 10.  Nonmedical Switching From Originators to Biosimilars: Does the Nocebo Effect Explain Treatment Failures and Adverse Events in Rheumatology and Gastroenterology?

Authors:  Roy Fleischmann; Vipul Jairath; Eduardo Mysler; Dave Nicholls; Paul Declerck
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2020-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.