Tom Karlsen1, Lorentz Sandvik2, John-Helge Heimdal3, Hans Jørgen Aarstad3. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Department of Speech and Language, Statped Vest, Bergen, Norway. Electronic address: tom.karlsen@helse-bergen.no. 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Patients with voice-related disorders are ideally treated by a multidisciplinary team. Acoustic voice analysis and patient-reported outcome measures are recommended parts of the clinical assessment. The present paper aims at further documenting the importance of acoustic voice analyses, maximum phonation time (MPT) and Voice Handicap Index (VHI) into clinical investigations. STUDY DESIGN: The participants (N = 80 larynx cancer, N = 32 recurrent palsy, N = 23 dysfunctional, N = 75 degenerative/inflammation (N = 19 various excluded)) were included consecutively at the outpatient laryngology clinic at Haukeland University Hospital. In addition, a control group of 98 healthy subjects were included. METHOD: Voice samples, MPT, and the VHI scores in addition to standard clinical information were obtained. Acoustic analyses were performed from these samples determining level of jitter, shimmer and Noise-to-Harmonic ratio (NHR) as well as analyzing frequency of a prolonged vowel. RESULTS: Jitter, shimmer, and NHR scores correlated strongly (r ≈ 0.8; P < 0.001) to each other. By Analysis of Variance analyses, we have determined significant dependence on diagnostic group analyzing all the obtained acoustic scores (all P < 0.001). All patient groups but the dysfunctional group scored to some extent worse than the control group (mostly at P < 0.001). In addition, jitter scores from dysfunction group were lower than recurrent palsy group (P < 0.05) and shimmer scores were lower among dysfunctional than the cancer group (P < 0.05). Regarding NHR the cancer patients scored higher than the degenerative/inflammatory group (P < 0.05). The cancer group scored with longer MPT than the degenerative/inflammatory (P < 0.001) and recurrent palsy groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Among larynx disease patients acoustic and MPT analyses segregated with all determined analyses between patients and control conditions except the dysfunctional group, but also to some extent between various patient groups. VHI scores correlated to jitter, shimmer and NHR scores among cancer and degenerative/inflammatory disease patients. Acoustic analyses potentially add information useful to laryngological patient studies.
OBJECTIVES:Patients with voice-related disorders are ideally treated by a multidisciplinary team. Acoustic voice analysis and patient-reported outcome measures are recommended parts of the clinical assessment. The present paper aims at further documenting the importance of acoustic voice analyses, maximum phonation time (MPT) and Voice Handicap Index (VHI) into clinical investigations. STUDY DESIGN: The participants (N = 80 larynx cancer, N = 32 recurrent palsy, N = 23 dysfunctional, N = 75 degenerative/inflammation (N = 19 various excluded)) were included consecutively at the outpatient laryngology clinic at Haukeland University Hospital. In addition, a control group of 98 healthy subjects were included. METHOD: Voice samples, MPT, and the VHI scores in addition to standard clinical information were obtained. Acoustic analyses were performed from these samples determining level of jitter, shimmer and Noise-to-Harmonic ratio (NHR) as well as analyzing frequency of a prolonged vowel. RESULTS: Jitter, shimmer, and NHR scores correlated strongly (r ≈ 0.8; P < 0.001) to each other. By Analysis of Variance analyses, we have determined significant dependence on diagnostic group analyzing all the obtained acoustic scores (all P < 0.001). All patient groups but the dysfunctional group scored to some extent worse than the control group (mostly at P < 0.001). In addition, jitter scores from dysfunction group were lower than recurrent palsy group (P < 0.05) and shimmer scores were lower among dysfunctional than the cancer group (P < 0.05). Regarding NHR the cancerpatients scored higher than the degenerative/inflammatory group (P < 0.05). The cancer group scored with longer MPT than the degenerative/inflammatory (P < 0.001) and recurrent palsy groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Among larynx diseasepatients acoustic and MPT analyses segregated with all determined analyses between patients and control conditions except the dysfunctional group, but also to some extent between various patient groups. VHI scores correlated to jitter, shimmer and NHR scores among cancer and degenerative/inflammatory diseasepatients. Acoustic analyses potentially add information useful to laryngological patient studies.
Authors: Beata Miaśkiewicz; Elżbieta Gos; Małgorzata Dębińska; Aleksandra Panasiewicz-Wosik; Dorota Kapustka; Katarzyna Nikiel; Elżbieta Włodarczyk; Anna Domeracka-Kołodziej; Paulina Krasnodębska; Agata Szkiełkowska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-29 Impact factor: 4.614