Literature DB >> 30092736

Clinical subsets of juvenile dermatomyositis classified by myositis-specific autoantibodies: Experience at a single center in Japan.

Naomi Iwata1, Haruna Nakaseko1, Toaki Kohagura1, Ryuhei Yasuoka1, Naoki Abe1, Shinji Kawabe1, Shiro Sugiura2, Yoshinao Muro3.   

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated the association between myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and clinical subsets of juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) in Japanese patients.
Methods: Twenty-one patients at a single center who developed initial or relapsed JDM from 2011 to 2016 were analyzed. Serum concentrations of MSAs against TIF1-γ, MDA5, NXP2, Mi-2, ARS, and SAE were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Clinical symptoms and laboratory data were obtained from clinical records. Clinical characteristics were compared in patients with autoantibodies against TIF1-γ, MDA5, and NXP2.
Results: Of the 21 patients, 20 (95.2%) were positive for one or more MSAs, including nine (42.9%), five (23.8%), six (28.6%), and one (4.8%) positive for anti-TIF1-γ, anti-MDA5, anti-NXP2, and anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies. No patient was positive for anti-ARS or anti-SAE autoantibodies. The frequency of diffuse cutaneous lesions was higher in patients with anti-TIF1-γ autoantibodies. Anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive patients had features of interstitial lung disease on chest computed tomography. Severe muscle damage at disease onset was significantly associated with positivity for anti-NXP2 autoantibodies.
Conclusion: Similar to findings in Western countries, the clinical characteristics of JDM in Japanese may differ for each type of MSAs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-MDA5; anti-NXP2; anti-TIF1-γ; juvenile dermatomyositis; myositis specific antibody

Year:  2018        PMID: 30092736     DOI: 10.1080/14397595.2018.1511025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Rheumatol        ISSN: 1439-7595            Impact factor:   3.023


  7 in total

Review 1.  Juvenile dermatomyositis: advances in clinical presentation, myositis-specific antibodies and treatment.

Authors:  Jian-Qiang Wu; Mei-Ping Lu; Ann M Reed
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.764

2.  Anti-MDA5 autoantibodies associated with juvenile dermatomyositis constitute a distinct phenotype in North America.

Authors:  Gulnara Mamyrova; Takayuki Kishi; Min Shi; Ira N Targoff; Adam M Huber; Rodolfo V Curiel; Frederick W Miller; Lisa G Rider
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 3.  Calcinosis Biomarkers in Adult and Juvenile Dermatomyositis.

Authors:  Melody P Chung; Carrie Richardson; David Kirakossian; Amir B Orandi; Lesley A Saketkoo; Lisa G Rider; Adam Schiffenbauer; Carlos A von Mühlen; Lorinda Chung
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 9.754

Review 4.  Understanding and managing anti-MDA 5 dermatomyositis, including potential COVID-19 mimicry.

Authors:  Pankti Mehta; Pedro M Machado; Latika Gupta
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 5.  The Significance of Autoantibodies in Juvenile Dermatomyositis.

Authors:  Dominika Kwiatkowska; Adam Reich
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Clinical and autoantibody phenotypes of juvenile dermatomyositis.

Authors:  Oksana Boyarchuk; Anna Kuka; Iryna Yuryk
Journal:  Reumatologia       Date:  2022-09-08

Review 7.  Juvenile Dermatomyositis-Clinical Phenotypes.

Authors:  Danyang Li; Sarah L Tansley
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.592

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.