William M Land1. 1. University of Texas at San Antonio, United States. Electronic address: William.land@utsa.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to examine whether movement contingent sensory effects could be used to prime and facilitate motor performance on a ball-tossing task. DESIGN: The ball-tossing task was performed across two consecutive days, and consisted of an acquisition phase and a test phase. During the acquisition phase, participants (N = 30) practiced an underhanded ball tossing task to a near and far target (N = 360 total, n = 180 each distance). Tosses that landed near the target immediately produced an auditory feedback tone upon landing, with unique tones for both the near and far target. In the test phase, the auditory tones preceded the toss and served as imperative stimuli for the tossing task. METHOD: The test phase consisted of three tossing conditions (corresponding, non-corresponding, and control) in which the participants responded to the tones by tossing the ball to either the corresponding or non-corresponding target associated with the tones during learning. RESULTS: Findings indicated that both accuracy and consistency of ball tossing improved when the toss was preceded by the corresponding auditory feedback associated with the successful execution of the action during learning. CONCLUSIONS: The present study extends previous research by showing that complex actions consisting of multiple degrees of freedom can be primed via movement contingent sensory effects. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that movement-effect priming can impact distal measures of motor performance (e.g., accuracy of tossing), as opposed to the features of movement production (e.g., response selection, initiation, and execution).
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to examine whether movement contingent sensory effects could be used to prime and facilitate motor performance on a ball-tossing task. DESIGN: The ball-tossing task was performed across two consecutive days, and consisted of an acquisition phase and a test phase. During the acquisition phase, participants (N = 30) practiced an underhanded ball tossing task to a near and far target (N = 360 total, n = 180 each distance). Tosses that landed near the target immediately produced an auditory feedback tone upon landing, with unique tones for both the near and far target. In the test phase, the auditory tones preceded the toss and served as imperative stimuli for the tossing task. METHOD: The test phase consisted of three tossing conditions (corresponding, non-corresponding, and control) in which the participants responded to the tones by tossing the ball to either the corresponding or non-corresponding target associated with the tones during learning. RESULTS: Findings indicated that both accuracy and consistency of ball tossing improved when the toss was preceded by the corresponding auditory feedback associated with the successful execution of the action during learning. CONCLUSIONS: The present study extends previous research by showing that complex actions consisting of multiple degrees of freedom can be primed via movement contingent sensory effects. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that movement-effect priming can impact distal measures of motor performance (e.g., accuracy of tossing), as opposed to the features of movement production (e.g., response selection, initiation, and execution).