Literature DB >> 30092305

Clinical outcome and risk factors for failure in late acute prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and implant retention.

Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker1, Marine Sebillotte2, Jose Lomas3, Adrian Taylor3, Eva Benavent Palomares4, Oscar Murillo4, Javad Parvizi5, Noam Shohat6, Javier Cobo Reinoso7, Rosa Escudero Sánchez7, Marta Fernandez-Sampedro8, Eric Senneville9, Kaisa Huotari10, José Maria Barbero11, Joaquín Garcia-Cañete12, Jaime Lora-Tamayo13, Matteo Carlo Ferrari14, Danguole Vaznaisiene15, Erlangga Yusuf16, Craig Aboltins17, Rihard Trebse18, Mauro José Salles19, Natividad Benito20, Andrea Vila21, Maria Dolores Del Toro22, Tobias Siegfried Kramer23, Sabine Petersdorf24, Vicens Diaz-Brito25, Zeliha Kocak Tufan26, Marisa Sanchez27, Cédric Arvieux28, Alex Soriano29.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is the recommended treatment for all acute prosthetic joint infections (PJI), but its efficacy in patients with late acute (LA) PJI is not well described.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed with LA PJI between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. LA PJI was defined as the development of acute symptoms (≤ 3 weeks) occurring ≥ 3 months after arthroplasty. Failure was defined as: (i) the need for implant removal, (ii) infection related death, (iii) the need for suppressive antibiotic therapy and/or (iv) relapse or reinfection during follow-up.
RESULTS: 340 patients from 27 centers were included. The overall failure rate was 45.0% (153/340). Failure was dominated by Staphylococcus aureus PJI (54.7%, 76/139). Significant independent preoperative risk factors for failure according to the multivariate analysis were: fracture as indication for the prosthesis (odds ratio (OR) 5.4), rheumatoid arthritis (OR 5.1), age above 80 years (OR 2.6), male gender (OR 2.0) and C-reactive protein > 150 mg/L (OR 2.0). Exchanging the mobile components during DAIR was the strongest predictor for treatment success (OR 0.35).
CONCLUSION: LA PJIs have a high failure rate. Treatment strategies should be individualized according to patients' age, comorbidity, clinical presentation and microorganism causing the infection.
Copyright © 2018 The British Infection Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute; Hematogenous; Prosthetic joint infection; Risk factors, failure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30092305     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect        ISSN: 0163-4453            Impact factor:   6.072


  25 in total

1.  The reasons for and mortality of patients unable to receive reimplantation after resection arthroplasty for chronic hip periprosthetic infection.

Authors:  Yu-Hsuan Lin; Chao-Jui Chang; Chih-Wei Chang; Yi-Chen Chen; Ta-Wei Tai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  What Are the Immune Responses That Allow Us to Live With Incurable Bone Infection, and How Can They Be Augmented to Improve Outcomes After Prosthetic Joint Infection?

Authors:  Edward M Schwarz
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 6.390

Review 3.  Role of Rifampin against Staphylococcal Biofilm Infections In Vitro, in Animal Models, and in Orthopedic-Device-Related Infections.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli; Parham Sendi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  One-year infection control rates of a DAIR (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention) procedure after primary and prosthetic-joint-infection-related revision arthroplasty - a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  F Ruben H A Nurmohamed; Bruce van Dijk; Ewout S Veltman; Marrit Hoekstra; Rob J Rentenaar; Harrie H Weinans; H Charles Vogely; Bart C H van der Wal
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2021-01-27

5.  Lower Success Rate of Débridement and Implant Retention in Late Acute versus Early Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection Caused by Staphylococcus spp. Results from a Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker; Marine Sebillotte; Kaisa Huotari; Rosa Escudero Sánchez; Eva Benavent; Javad Parvizi; Marta Fernandez-Sampedro; José Maria Barbero; Joaquín Garcia-Cañete; Rihard Trebse; Maria Del Toro; Vicens Diaz-Brito; Marisa Sanchez; Matthew Scarborough; Alex Soriano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Periprosthetic Joint Infections as a Consequence of Bacteremia.

Authors:  Meeri Honkanen; Esa Jämsen; Matti Karppelin; Reetta Huttunen; Antti Eskelinen; Jaana Syrjänen
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.835

7.  Outcomes, Microbiology and Antimicrobial Usage in Pressure Ulcer-Related Pelvic Osteomyelitis: Messages for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Clark D Russell; Shao-Ting Jerry Tsang; Alasdair Hamish R W Simpson; Rebecca K Sutherland
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2020-03-26

8.  Clinical outcomes of teicoplanin use in the OPAT setting.

Authors:  Hannah Dabrowski; Helena Wickham; Surjo De; Jonathan Underwood; Stephen Morris-Jones; Sarah Logan; Michael Marks; Gabriele Pollara
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 5.283

9.  [Pseudomonas stutzeri prosthetic joint infection: a therapeutic challenge associated with multiple severe complications].

Authors:  D Alonso Menchén; J M Barbero Allende; J Balsa Vázquez; C I Jacob García-Asenjo; G Hernández García; R Font González
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 1.553

Review 10.  Systematic review of risk prediction studies in bone and joint infection: are modifiable prognostic factors useful in predicting recurrence?

Authors:  Maria Dudareva; Andrew Hotchen; Martin A McNally; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Matthew Scarborough; Gary Collins
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2021-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.