Literature DB >> 30092205

Increase in Lactate Without Change in Nutritive Blood Flow or Glucose at Active Trigger Points Following Massage: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Albert F Moraska1, Robert C Hickner2, Rachael Rzasa-Lynn3, Jay P Shah4, Jonathan R Hebert5, Wendy M Kohrt6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate changes in nutritive blood flow as well as interstitial glucose and lactate within an active myofascial trigger point (MTrP) following massage.
DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
SETTING: Subjects were recruited from the general population; procedures were conducted at a research center affiliated with a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=25) (18-49y old) with episodic or chronic tension-type headache and an active MTrP in the upper trapezius muscle.
INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomized to receive a single trigger point (TrP) release massage or sham ultrasound (US) treatment at an active MTrP in the upper trapezius muscle. Microdialysis was used to continuously sample interstitial fluid from the MTrP before, during, and for 60 minutes following intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was nutritive blood flow within the MTrP as measured by microdialysis ethanol clearance; secondary measures included dialysate glucose, dialysate lactate, and subject discomfort with the procedures. Pressure-pain threshold (PPT) was determined to assess treatment effectiveness.
RESULTS: There was no treatment effect of TrP release massage on nutritive blood flow (P=.663) or dialysate glucose (P=.766). The interaction for lactate was significant indicating that dialysate lactate increased for TrP release massage vs sham US (P=.04); maximum lactate increase over baseline was observed at 60 minutes after TrP release massage (P=.007, 0.128 μM, 95% confidence interval 0.045-0.212). Pain evoked by probe placement into an active MTrP was low. An interaction effect on PPT was significant (P=.005).
CONCLUSION: TrP release massage of an active MTrP affected anaerobic metabolism as represented by an increase in dialysate lactate without change in nutritive blood flow or dialysate glucose. The lack of a treatment effect on blood flow is discussed.
Copyright © 2018 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Headache; Microdialysis; Referred pain; Rehabilitation; Skeletal muscle; Tension-type headache; Trigger points

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30092205     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  6 in total

Review 1.  Re-Examining Myofascial Pain Syndrome: Toward Biomarker Development and Mechanism-Based Diagnostic Criteria.

Authors:  Felipe C K Duarte; Daniel W D West; Lukas D Linde; Samah Hassan; Dinesh A Kumbhare
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Does the type of foam roller influence the recovery rate, thermal response and DOMS prevention?

Authors:  Jakub Grzegorz Adamczyk; Karol Gryko; Dariusz Boguszewski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Pressing Intervention Promotes the Skeletal Muscle Repair of Traumatic Myofascial Trigger Points in Rats.

Authors:  Quanrui Jiang; Xiang Feng; Dan Liu; Tao Li; Xiaoxia Kuang; Xiaowei Liu; Wu Li; Jiangshan Li
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 4.  Effect of ischemic compression on myofascial pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Lu; Jiong Li; Ye Tian; Xingang Lu
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2022-09-01

5.  Acupuncture in the Treatment of Sequestered Intervertebral Disk Herniation.

Authors:  Vadim Buevich; Maxim Buevich; Natalia Buevich
Journal:  Med Acupunct       Date:  2021-06-16

6.  Abdominal Massage Alleviates Skeletal Muscle Insulin Resistance by Regulating the AMPK/SIRT1/PGC-1α Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Yiran Han; Zeyuan Lu; Shaotao Chen; Chongwen Zhong; Minghui Yan; Heran Wang; Meng Meng; Mingjun Liu
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.194

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.