| Literature DB >> 30091969 |
Sarah C Haight, Jean Y Ko, Van T Tong, Michele K Bohm, William M Callaghan.
Abstract
Opioid use by pregnant women represents a significant public health concern given the association of opioid exposure and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including preterm labor, stillbirth, neonatal abstinence syndrome, and maternal mortality (1,2). State-level actions are critical to curbing the opioid epidemic through programs and policies to reduce use of prescription opioids and illegal opioids including heroin and illicitly manufactured fentanyl, both of which contribute to the epidemic (3). Hospital discharge data from the 1999-2014 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) were analyzed to describe U.S. national and state-specific trends in opioid use disorder documented at delivery hospitalization. Nationally, the prevalence of opioid use disorder more than quadrupled during 1999-2014 (from 1.5 per 1,000 delivery hospitalizations to 6.5; p<0.05). Increasing trends over time were observed in all 28 states with available data (p<0.05). In 2014, prevalence ranged from 0.7 in the District of Columbia (DC) to 48.6 in Vermont. Continued national, state, and provider efforts to prevent, monitor, and treat opioid use disorder among reproductive-aged and pregnant women are needed. Efforts might include improved access to data in Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs, increased substance abuse screening, use of medication-assisted therapy, and substance abuse treatment referrals.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30091969 PMCID: PMC6089335 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6731a1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ISSN: 0149-2195 Impact factor: 17.586
National and state-specific prevalence of opioid use disorder per 1,000 delivery hospitalizations* — National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and State Inpatient Database, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), 1999–2014
| State | Year | Average annual rate change¶ | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Arizona | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 5.2 | 0.28 |
| Arkansas | — | — | — | — | — | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 0.25 |
| California | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.2 | — | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.6 | — | — | — | 0.01 |
| Colorado | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 0.20 |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.6 | 0.7 | —** |
| Florida | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 4.1 | 5.1 | 5.6 | 6.3 | 6.6 | 0.58 |
| Georgia | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.0 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 0.39 |
| Hawaii | — | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 0.09 |
| Iowa | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.10 |
| Kentucky | — | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 5.1 | 6.1 | 7.2 | 9.5 | 14 | 15.7 | 19.3 | 1.55 |
| Maine | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 4.0 | — | — | 9.4 | 10.7 | 13.5 | 21.7 | 26.2 | 27.8 | 34.1 | — | — | 4.13 |
| Maryland | 8.2 | 6.7 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.6 | 7.6 | 7.1 | 6.9 | 7.7 | 8.8 | 9.1 | 10.9 | 11.8 | 11.7 | 0.27 |
| Massachusetts | 2.0 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 3.7 | 4.6 | 4.9 | 6.5 | 6.9 | 8.3 | 8.8 | 9.6 | 12.2 | 13.1 | — | 0.90 |
| Michigan | — | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 4.2 | 5.1 | 5.4 | 6.2 | 7.7 | 0.55 |
| Minnesota | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.4 | —** |
| Mississippi | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.9 | 1.6 | — | — | — | —** |
| Nebraska | — | — | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.08 |
| Nevada | — | — | — | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 4.5 | 0.33 |
| New Jersey | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 5.3 | 5.6 | 0.08 |
| New Mexico | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.8 | 3.9 | 5.5 | 7.6 | 10.6 | 13.6 | 14.8 | 2.47 |
| New York | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 4.2 | 4.9 | 0.20 |
| North Carolina | — | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 6.4 | 7.8 | 0.64 |
| Oregon | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 2.7 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 5.7 | 6.9 | 8.4 | 0.49 |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — | 4.1 | 3.3 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 3.1 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.9 | 6.1 | 7.4 | 7.2 | 8.0 | 10.2 | 0.51 |
| South Carolina | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 4.4 | — | 0.34 |
| South Dakota | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 0.29 |
| Utah | — | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 3.7 | 0.25 |
| Vermont | — | — | 0.5 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 7.6 | 12.9 | 14.6 | 19.0 | 28.5 | 27.1 | 33.8 | 43.7 | 51.1 | 48.6 | 5.37 |
| Washington | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 5.3 | 6.9 | 7.1 | 8.5 | 10.8 | 0.71 |
| West Virginia | — | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 4.2 | 6.8 | 7.1 | 8.2 | 10.1 | 11.2 | 15.3 | 21.3 | 29.8 | 32.1 | 2.83 |
| Wisconsin | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 3.5 | 4.6 | 5.6 | 6.9 | 7.6 | 0.65 |
* Prevalence numerator consisted of cases of opioid type dependence and nondependent opioid abuse based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes (304.00–304.03, 304.70–304.73, 305.50–305.53), and denominator consisted of national and state delivery hospitalization discharges.
† Includes data from all states participating in HCUP each year (https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/partners.jsp?NIS), weighted to produce national estimates. Rates through 2011 are weighted with trend weights, and rates 2012 and after are weighted using original NIS discharge weights to account for the change in NIS design in 2012.
§ Includes 30 states and the District of Columbia with publically available data. Availability of data ranged from 14 states in 1999 to 28 states in 2011.
¶ Estimated average annual change in the prevalence rate of opioid use disorder diagnoses per 1,000 delivery hospitalizations; all estimates were significant (p<0.05).
** Insufficient data (<3 years) to assess linear trend.
FIGURE 1National prevalence of opioid use disorder per 1,000 delivery hospitalizations* — National Inpatient Sample (NIS), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), United States, 1999–2014
* Prevalence numerator consisted of cases of opioid type dependence and nondependent opioid abuse based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes (304.00–304.03, 304.70–304.73, 305.50–305.53), and denominator consisted of delivery hospitalization discharges.
† Includes data from all states participating in HCUP each year (https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/partners.jsp?NIS), weighted to produce national estimates. Rates before 2012 are weighted with trend weights, and rates after 2012 are weighted using original NIS discharge weights to account for the change in NIS design in 2012.
FIGURE 2Prevalence of opioid use disorder per 1,000 delivery hospitalizations* — State Inpatient Database, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, 28 states, 2013–2014
* Prevalence numerator consisted of opioid type dependence and nondependent opioid abuse based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes (304.00–304.03, 304.70–304.73, 305.50–305.53), and denominator consisted of state delivery hospitalization discharges.
† Prevalence reported are for 2014, except for two states (Massachusetts and South Carolina) for which 2014 data were not available; 2013 data are reported for these states.