| Literature DB >> 30090698 |
H D Rosas1, P Wilkens2, D H Salat3, N D Mercaldo4, M Vangel5, A Y Yendiki6, S M Hersch7.
Abstract
Although much prior work has focused on the basal ganglia and cortical pathology that defines Huntington's disease (HD), recent studies have also begun to characterize cerebral white matter damage (Rosas et al., 2006; Dumas et al., 2012; Poudel et al., 2014). In this study, we investigated differences in the large fascicular bundles of the cerebral white matter of gene-positive HD carriers, including pre-manifest individuals and early symptomatic patients, using recently developed diffusion tractography procedures. We examined eighteen major fiber bundles in 37 patients with early HD (average age 55.2 ± 11.5, 14 male, 23 female), 31 gene-positive, motor negative pre-symptomatic HD (PHD) (average age 48.1 ± 11.5, 13 male, 18 female), and 38 healthy age-matched controls (average age 55.7 ± 8.6, 14 male, 24 female), using the TRActs Constrained by UnderLying Anatomy (TRACULA) procedure available as part of the FreeSurfer image processing software package. We calculated the mean fractional anisotropy (FA) and the mean radial (RD) and axial diffusivities (AD) for each fiber bundle. We also evaluated the relationships between diffusion measures, cognition and regional cortical thinning. We found that early changes in RD of select tracts in PHD subjects were associated with impaired performance on neuropsychological tests, suggesting that early changes in myelin might underlie early cognitive dysfunction. Finally, we found that increases in AD of select tracts were associated with regionally select cortical thinning of areas known to atrophy in HD, including the sensorimotor, supramarginal and fusiform gyrus, suggesting that AD may be reflecting pyramidal cell degeneration in HD. Together, these results suggest that white matter microstructural changes in HD reflect a complex, clinically relevant and dynamic process.Entities:
Keywords: Huntington's disease; Pre-manifest Huntington's; White matter degeneration
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30090698 PMCID: PMC6078048 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Demographics of the cohorts.
| Group | Age | GenderM/F | Total FC | Digit span forward | Digit span backwards | HVLT delay | Stroop color | Symbol digit | Verbal fluency phonemic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 54.7 ± 8.8 | 14/23 | 13 | 11.5 ± 2.2 | 7.8 ± 2.9 | 29.5 ± 4.3 | 44.8 ± 10.7 | 52.5 ± 10.3 | 45.4 ± 13.5 |
| PreHD | 48.1 ± 11.5 | 13/18 | 12.04 ± 1.1 | 10.9 ± 1.9 | 7.7 ± 2.9 | 9.1 ± 2.7 | 69.6 ± 18.2 | 47.0 ± 12.6 | 46.4 ± 13.7 |
| PHDfar | 45.0 ± 9.8 | 5/5 | 12.1 ± 0.8 | 10.8 ± 1.5 | 8.3 ± 2.6 | 9.9 ± 2.3 | 75.6 ± 20.2 | 50.8 ± 13.9 | 47.2 ± 10.5 |
| PHDnear | 49.6 ± 12.2 | 8/13 | 12.0 ± 1.3 | 11.0 ± 2.4 | 7.2 ± 3.3 | 8.7 ± 2.8 | 66.4 ± 16.7 | 45.0 ± 11.9 | 45.9 ± 15.5 |
| HD | 55.2 ± 11.5 | 14/24 | 8.4 ± 2.6 | 9.3 ± 2.3 | 5.07 ± 1.98 | 5.3 ± 3.2 | 47.6 ± 19.6 | 27.9 ± 12.1 | 27.5 ± 15.7 |
Continuous variables are summarized using mean and stand deviation; categorical variables (i.e. gender) are listed as counts.
Fig. 1Group comparisons of FA, MD, RD and AD between controls, PHD and HD participants. Error bars were constructed using 1 standard error from the mean.
LH = left; RH = right; ATR = anterior thalamic radiations; CAG = cingulum-angular bundle; CCG = cingulum-cingulate gyrus bundle; CST = corticospinal tract; ILF = inferior longitudinal fasciculus; SLFp = superior longitudinal fasciculus-parietal endings; SLFt = superior longitudinal fasciculus temporal endings; UNC = uncinate fasciculus; FMAJOR = corpus callous-forceps major; FMINOR = corpus callosum-forceps minor.
Spearman's correlation between cognitive scores and radial diffusivity.
| Neuropsychological scores | Tract | Group | Spearman's correlation, ρ | Unadjusted p-value ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total motor skills | CST | Right | Pre-HD | 0.52 | 0.006 | |
| Digit span | Forward | FMinor | HD | −0.34 | 0.051 | |
| HVLT delay | ATR | Left | Pre-HD | −0.40 | 0.028 | |
| CCG | Left | −0.41 | 0.023 | |||
| SLFp | Left | −0.40 | 0.026 (0.030) | |||
| Right | −0.49 | 0.006 | ||||
| ILF | Left | −0.53 | 0.003 | |||
| Stroop | Color | FMajor | HD | −0.59 | <0.001 | |
| SLFp | Left | Pre-HD | −0.45 | 0.012 | ||
| Right | −0.46 | 0.010 | ||||
| Symbol digit | FMajor | HD | −0.66 | <0.001 | ||
| ILF | Left | Pre-HD | −0.43 | 0.017 | ||
| Right | HD | −0.47 | 0.006 | |||
| SLFp | Left | Pre-HD | −0.38 | 0.036 | ||
| Right | −0.42 | 0.020 | ||||
| Left | HD | −0.34 | 0.053 | |||
| Right | −0.52 | 0.002 | ||||
Significant using false discovery rate adjusted threshold.
Fig. 2Associations between regional cortical thickness and axial diffusivity. There were significant inverse correlations between AD and the thickness of associated cortical regions in HD (turquoise) but not in controls (red). The correlation plots are highlighted in the same color reflecting the cortical region associated with the respective tract. The x-axis corresponds to AD; the y-axis corresponds to cortical thickness. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Spearman's correlation between cortical thickness and axial diffusivity in HD subjects.
| Cortical region | Tract | Spearman's correlation, ρ | Unadjusted p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entorhinal cortex | ATR | Left | −0.40 | 0.013 |
| Fusiform | SLFp | Left | −0.53 | 0.001 |
| Parahippocampal | UNC | Left | −0.42 | 0.009 |
| Precentral | ATR | Right | −0.45 | 0.005 |
| CST | Left | −0.0.59 | <0.001 | |
| SLFp | Left | −0.50 | 0.004 | |
| Rostral middle frontal | SLFt | Left | −0.41 | 0.010 |
| Superior frontal | ATR | Right | −0.42 | 0.010 |
| Superior temporal | SLFt | Left | −0.41 | 0.011 |
| Supramarginal | SLFt | Left | −0.49 | 0.002 |
| Thalamus | ATR | Right | −0.56 | <0.001 |
Significant using false discovery rate adjusted p-value.