Literature DB >> 30090364

Accumulation, biotransformation, and multi-biomarker responses after exposure to arsenic species in the earthworm Eisenia fetida.

Zhifeng Wang1, Zhaojie Cui1.   

Abstract

Earthworms (Eisenia fetida) were exposed to OECD soils contaminated with arsenite (29.3 mg kg-1), arsenate (35.2 mg kg-1), monomethylarsonate (342.5 mg kg-1) and dimethylarsinate (373.0 mg kg-1) for 64 days. The exposure concentration for the four arsenic species was set at one-tenth of 14 d-LC50 in order to compare their toxicity. Eight biomarkers including superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione S-transferase, glutathione reductase, reduced glutathione, lipid peroxidation and metallothioneins were analyzed in the organisms. A multi-biomarker approach, the integrated biomarker response (IBR) index, was adopted to summarize the multi-biomarker responses to a single value, reflecting the integrated stress of different arsenic species on earthworms. Furthermore, total arsenic and arsenic speciation were analyzed in earthworm tissue to evaluate the relationship between arsenic accumulation and biomarker responses at the molecular and subcellular levels and to observe the role of arsenic biotransformation in earthworms. The results showed that the toxicity of the four arsenic species was ranked as: arsenite > arsenate > monomethylarsonate and dimethylarsinate. Although organic arsenics showed a low degree of biotoxicity, they could be turned into highly toxic inorganic arsenics under the effect of demethylation, which caused a toxic effect on organisms. The biomarker responses indicated that a sub-lethal dose of both arsenite and arsenate could trigger the response of the antioxidant defense system and cause oxidative damage when the protective capacity of the system was exhausted. Arsenic in earthworms could be detoxified during the process of biotransformation, where inorganic arsenics were converted into organic arsenics, which would then be excreted out. Based on these results, it was proved that different arsenic species showed different degrees of toxicity. Therefore, arsenic species should be differentiated in order to obtain accurate results in quality/risk assessment programs.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 30090364      PMCID: PMC6062360          DOI: 10.1039/c5tx00396b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)        ISSN: 2045-452X            Impact factor:   3.524


  42 in total

Review 1.  The bioavailability of chemicals in soil for earthworms.

Authors:  R Lanno; J Wells; J Conder; K Bradham; N Basta
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.291

2.  The use and misuse of biomarkers in ecotoxicology.

Authors:  Valery E Forbes; Annemette Palmqvist; Lis Bach
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Speciation analysis of arsenic compounds by capillary electrophoresis on-line coupled with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry using a novel interface.

Authors:  Lihong Liu; Bin He; Zhaojun Yun; Jing Sun; Guibin Jiang
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.759

4.  Source identification and health risk assessment of metals in urban soils around the Tanggu chemical industrial district, Tianjin, China.

Authors:  Long Zhao; Yafei Xu; Hong Hou; Yuxian Shangguan; Fasheng Li
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Effect of dietary selenium on erythrocyte and liver glutathione peroxidase in the rat.

Authors:  D G Hafeman; R A Sunde; W G Hoekstra
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Biochemical responses in the gills of Meretrix meretrix after exposure to treated municipal effluent.

Authors:  Ru Wan; Fanping Meng; Wenchao Fu; Qun Wang; Enping Su
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 6.291

7.  Metal compartmentation and speciation in a soil sentinel: the earthworm, Dendrodrilus rubidus.

Authors:  Janet Cotter-Howells; John M Charnock; Carole Winters; Peter Kille; John C Fry; A John Morgan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Accumulation, biotransformation, and biochemical responses after exposure to arsenite and arsenate in the estuarine polychaete Laeonereis acuta (Nereididae).

Authors:  Juliane Ventura-Lima; Patrícia Baptista Ramos; Daniele Fattorini; Francesco Regoli; Luis Ferraz; Leandro Machado de Carvalho; José M Monserrat
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 9.  Arsenic toxicity and potential mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Michael F Hughes
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2002-07-07       Impact factor: 4.372

10.  Arsenic biotransformation in earthworms from contaminated soils.

Authors:  Mark Button; Gawen R T Jenkin; Chris F Harrington; Michael J Watts
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2009-06-17
View more
  1 in total

1.  Antioxidant defense system responses, lysosomal membrane stability and DNA damage in earthworms (Eisenia fetida) exposed to perfluorooctanoic acid: an integrated biomarker approach to evaluating toxicity.

Authors:  Zhifeng Wang; Chaona Li; Yuanyuan Shao; Weina Xue; Ning Wang; Xiaoming Xu; Zhibin Zhang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.036

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.