Literature DB >> 30090346

Evaluation of the intracellular uptake and cytotoxicity effect of TiO2 nanostructures for various human oral and lung cells under dark conditions.

Chieh-Wei Chen1, Jing-Hong Huang1, Tsung-Ching Lai2, Yi-Hua Jan2, Michael Hsiao2, Chung-Hsuan Chen2, Yeu-Kuang Hwu3, Ru-Shi Liu1,2,4.   

Abstract

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanomaterials (NMs) have been widely used to develop commercial products such as sunscreen cosmetics because of their unique optical properties to provide complete protection from ultraviolet (UV) light. The most dangerous type of UV radiation is UVA, which comprises nearly 97% of the UV radiation that reaches the Earth. This type of radiation is also the major cause of skin damage. As the most beneficial content of sunscreen cosmetics, TiO2 NMs exhibit immense capability to protect the human skin from UVA exposure through their scattering and reflecting physical properties. Therefore, investigating the factors involved in using TiO2 NMs in cosmetics is necessary. In this study, various human oral and lung cell lines were selected to evaluate the cytotoxicity of treatment using different sizes and shapes of TiO2 NMs, including spheres (AFDC and AFDC300) and rods (M212 and cNRs). The morphology, size, and crystalline phase of the selected TiO2 NMs were studied to characterize each physical property. Based on cell viability and endocytic behavior results, treatment with all the selected TiO2 NMs were nearly non-toxic to the oral cell lines. However, high cytotoxicity was obviously observed in lung cells with M212 and AFDC treatments at 50 μg mL-1, which was larger by approximately 20% than with ADC300 and cNRs treatments because the smaller the TiO2 NMs, the larger their specific surface area. This condition resulted in the progress of apoptosis from the considerable aggregation of TiO2 NMs in the cytoplasm. Moreover, compared with those of TiO2 NMs with a similar structure (e.g., cNRs) and size (e.g., M212), the cellular uptake of AFDC was evidently low, which resulted in the approximated non-toxicity. Moreover, the similar sizes and different shapes of AFDC and cNRs were considered to treat lung cells to investigate further the influence of morphology on the cell cycle and the apoptosis effect. Consequently, AFDC and cNRs could inhibit the growth of lung cells and allow a considerable proportion of the cells to remain in the G1/G0 phase. Furthermore, a high-dose treatment would directly induce the apoptosis pathway, whereas a low-dose treatment might decrease cell regeneration.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 30090346      PMCID: PMC6062302          DOI: 10.1039/c5tx00312a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)        ISSN: 2045-452X            Impact factor:   3.524


  28 in total

1.  Role of physicochemical characteristics in the uptake of TiO2 nanoparticles by fibroblasts.

Authors:  Zouhir E Allouni; Paul J Høl; Miguel A Cauqui; Nils R Gjerdet; Mihaela R Cimpan
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.500

2.  Effect of size of TiO2 nanoparticles embedded into stratum corneum on ultraviolet-A and ultraviolet-B sun-blocking properties of the skin.

Authors:  Alexey P Popov; Jürgen Lademann; Alexander V Priezzhev; Risto Myllylä
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Evidence for an early G1 ionic event necessary for cell cycle progression and survival in the MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cell line.

Authors:  S Wang; Z Melkoumian; K A Woodfork; C Cather; A G Davidson; W F Wonderlin; J S Strobl
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Combined Toxicity of Nano-ZnO and Nano-TiO2: From Single- to Multinanomaterial Systems.

Authors:  Tiezheng Tong; Carolyn M Wilke; Jinsong Wu; Chu Thi Thanh Binh; John J Kelly; Jean-François Gaillard; Kimberly A Gray
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 5.  Toxicity, Uptake, and Translocation of Engineered Nanomaterials in Vascular plants.

Authors:  Pola Miralles; Tamara L Church; Andrew T Harris
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Optical modeling of nanocrystalline TiO2 films.

Authors:  Akira Usami; Hajime Ozaki
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Evaluating cytotoxicity and cellular uptake from the presence of variously processed TiO2 nanostructured morphologies.

Authors:  Jingyi Chen; Hongjun Zhou; Alexander C Santulli; Stanislaus S Wong
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 3.739

8.  Size-dependent toxicity of metal oxide particles--a comparison between nano- and micrometer size.

Authors:  Hanna L Karlsson; Johanna Gustafsson; Pontus Cronholm; Lennart Möller
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 4.372

9.  Photocatalysis by titanium dioxide and polyoxometalate/TiO2 cocatalysts. Intermediates and mechanistic study.

Authors:  Chuncheng Chen; Pengxiang Lei; Hongwei Ji; Wanhong Ma; Jincai Zhao; Hisao Hidaka; Nick Serpone
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  Engineered nanoparticles interacting with cells: size matters.

Authors:  Li Shang; Karin Nienhaus; Gerd Ulrich Nienhaus
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 10.435

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Adverse Outcome Pathways Associated with the Ingestion of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dora Rolo; Ricardo Assunção; Célia Ventura; Paula Alvito; Lídia Gonçalves; Carla Martins; Ana Bettencourt; Peter Jordan; Nádia Vital; Joana Pereira; Fátima Pinto; Paulo Matos; Maria João Silva; Henriqueta Louro
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 5.719

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.