| Literature DB >> 30090095 |
Johana E Dominguez1,2, Leandro M Redondo1,2, Roque A Figueroa Espinosa2,3, Daniela Cejas2,3, Gabriel O Gutkind2,3, Pablo A Chacana1, José A Di Conza2,3, Mariano E Fernández Miyakawa1,2.
Abstract
The use of antimicrobial growth promoters (AGPs) in sub-therapeutic doses for long periods promotes the selection of resistant microorganisms and the subsequent risk of spreading this resistance to the human population and the environment. Global concern about antimicrobial resistance development and transference of resistance genes from animal to human has been rising. The goal of our research was to evaluate the susceptibility pattern to different classes of antimicrobials of colistin-resistant Escherichia coli from poultry production systems that use AGPs, and characterize the resistance determinants associated to transferable platforms. E. coli strains (n = 41) were obtained from fecal samples collected from typical Argentine commercial broiler farms and susceptibility for 23 antimicrobials, relevant for human or veterinary medicine, was determined. Isolates were tested by PCR for the presence of mcr-1, extended spectrum β-lactamase encoding genes and plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) coding genes. Conjugation and susceptibility patterns of the transconjugant studies were performed. ERIC-PCR and REP-PCR analysis showed a high diversity of the isolates. Resistance to several antimicrobials was determined and all colistin-resistant isolates harbored the mcr-1 gene. CTX-M-2 cefotaximase was the main mechanism responsible for third generation cephalosporins resistance, and PMQR determinants were also identified. In addition, co-transference of the qnrB determinant on the mcr-1-positive transconjugants was corroborated, which suggests that these resistance genes are likely to be located in the same plasmid. In this work a wide range of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms were identified in E. coli strains isolated from the environment of healthy chickens highlighting the risk of antimicrobial abuse/misuse in animals under intensive production systems and its consequences for public health.Entities:
Keywords: CTX-M-2; Colistin; Escherichia coli; food-borne bacteria; mcr-1; multi drug resistance; qnrB
Year: 2018 PMID: 30090095 PMCID: PMC6068390 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01679
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Targets, primers, sequence, and product size used for PCR and sequencing of mcr-1, BLEE, ESBL, AmpC, and PMQR genes.
| CLR5-F | CGGTCAGTCCGTTTGTTC | 344 | Liu et al., | |
| CLR5-R | CTTGGTCGGTCTGTA GGG | |||
| CTX-M GRAL F | ATGTGCAGYACCAGTAARGTKATGGC | 500 | Ghiglione, | |
| CTX-M GRAL R | CCGCTGCCGCTYTTATCVCCBAC | |||
| CTX-M-1 CF | ATGGTTAAAAAATCACTGC | 864 | Saba Villarroel et al., | |
| CTX-M-1 CR | GGTGACGATTTTAGCCGC | |||
| CTX-M-1 FpK | AAATGGTTAAAAAATCACTGC | 876 | Ghiglione, | |
| CTX-M-1 RpK | CTACAAACCGTCGGTGACGAT | |||
| CTX-M-2 FpK | TAATGATGACTCAGAGCATTCGC | 900 | Ghiglione, | |
| CTX-M-2 RpK | GCATCAGAAACCGTGGGTTACG | |||
| CTX-M-2 CF | TTAATGATGACTCAGAGCATTC | 910 | Bertona et al., | |
| CTX-M-2 CR | GATACCTCGCTCCATTTATTGC | |||
| CTX-M-8 CF | TGAATACTTCAGCCACACG | 923 | Saba Villarroel et al., | |
| CTX-M-8 CR | TAGAATTAATAACCGTCGGT | |||
| CTX-M-8 FpK | AGATGATGAGACATCGCGTTAAGC | 1184 | Ghiglione, | |
| CTX-M-8 RpK | TTAATAACCGTCGGTGACG | |||
| CTX-M-9 CF | ATGGTGACAAAGAGAGTGC | 876 | Saba Villarroel et al., | |
| CTX-M-9C R | TCACAGCCCTTCGGCGATG | |||
| CTX-M-9 FpK | AGATGGTGACAAAGAGAGTGC | 876 | Ghiglione, | |
| CTX-M-9 RpK | TTACAGCCCTTCGGCGATG | |||
| CTX-M-25 CF | ATGAGAMAWMGCGTWARGC | 878 | Saba Villarroel et al., | |
| CTX-M-25 CR | TAGAATTAATAACCGTCGGTGAC | |||
| MOXMF | GCT GCT CAA GGA GCA CAG GAT | 520 | Cejas et al., | |
| MOXMR | CAC ATT GAC ATA GGT GTG GTG C | |||
| CITMF | TGG CCA GAA CTG ACA GGC AAA | 462 | ||
| CITMR | TTT CTC CTG AAC GTC GCT GGC | |||
| DHAMF | AAC TTT CAC AGC TGT GCT GGG T | 405 | ||
| DHAMR | CCG TAC GCA TAC TGG CTT TGC | |||
| ACCMF | AAC AGC CTC AGC AGC CGG TTA | 346 | ||
| ACCMR | TTC GCC GCA ATC ATC CCT AGC | |||
| EBCMF | TCG GTA AAG CCG ATG TTG CGG | 302 | ||
| EBCMR | CTT CCA CTG CGG CTG CCA GTT | |||
| FOXMF | AAC ATG GGG TAT CAG GGA GAT G | 190 | ||
| FOXMR | CAA AGC GCG TAA CCG GAT TGG | |||
| CMY -F | ATGATGAAAAAATCGTTATGCT | 1146 | ||
| CMY-R | TTATTGCAGCTTTTCAAGAATGCG | |||
| qnrA-F | AGAGGATTTCTCACGCCAGG | 580 | Cruz et al., | |
| qnrA-R | TGCCAGGCACAGATCTTGAC | |||
| qnrS-F | GCAAGTTCATTGAACAGGGT | 428 | ||
| qnrS-R | TCTAAACCGTCGAGTTCGGCG | |||
| qnrC-F | GGGTTGTACATTTATTGAATCG | 330 | ||
| qnrC-R | CACCTACCCATTTATTTTCA | |||
| qnrD-F | CGAGATCAATTTACGGGGAATA | 582 | ||
| qnrD-R | AACAAGCTGAAGCGCCTG | |||
| qnrB-F | GGMATHGAAAATCGCCACTG | 264 | ||
| qnrB-R | TTTGCYGYYCGCCAGTCGAA | |||
| qnrBIF-F | ATGWYGYCATTACTGTATA | 676 | ||
| qnrBIF-R | CCMATHAYMGCGATRCCAAG | |||
| qnrBcf-F | GTTRGCGAAAAAATTRACAG | 626 | ||
| qnrBIF-R | CCMATHAYMGCGATRCCAAG | |||
| qepA-F | ACATCTACGGCTTCTTCGTCG | 501 | ||
| qepA-R | AACTGCTTGAGCCCGTAGATC | |||
| aac(6′)Ib-F | CGATCTCATATCGTCGAGTGTT | 447 | ||
| aac(6′)Ib-R | TTAGGCATCACTGCGTGTTC | |||
| oqxA-F | CTCGGCGCGATGATGCT | 393 | ||
| oqxA-R | CCACTCTTCACGGGAGACGA | |||
| oqxB-F | TTCTCCCCCGGCGGGAAGTAC | 513 | ||
| oqxB-R | CTCGGCCATTTTGGCGCGTA |
Characteristics of Escherichia coli recovered from different farms in Buenos Aires and Entre Ríos, Argentina, 2014.
| Buenos Aires | 1 | 2 (S) | ||||||||||
| 8 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 1 (S) | ||||||||||||
| 2 | 0.5 (S) | |||||||||||
| 1 (S) | ||||||||||||
| 1 (S) | ||||||||||||
| 3 | 8 (R) | |||||||||||
| 2 (S) | ||||||||||||
| 8 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 8 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 0,5 (S) | ||||||||||||
| 4 | 8 (R) | |||||||||||
| 8 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 4 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 8 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 2 (S) | ||||||||||||
| 8(R) | ||||||||||||
| 5 | 8(R) | |||||||||||
| 4 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 8 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 16 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 8(R) | ||||||||||||
| 6 | 8 (R) | |||||||||||
| 4 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 8 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 8 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 2 (S) | ||||||||||||
| 8 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 7 | 2 (S) | |||||||||||
| 8 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 4(R) | ||||||||||||
| Entre Ríos | 8 | 8 (R) | ||||||||||
| 8 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 9 | 8 (R) | |||||||||||
| 32 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 16 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 10 | 4 (R) | |||||||||||
| 8 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 11 | 8 (R) | |||||||||||
| 32 (R) | ||||||||||||
| 8 (R) | ||||||||||||
The squares in gray indicate presence of the gene; while the squares in white indicate absence of the studied gene. (R) resistant and (S) susceptible by MIC determinations with colistin.
Plasmid conjugation studies.
| 8 | R | R | ||
| EC190-14 TC | 4 | I | S | |
| 8 | I | S | ||
| EC191-07 TC | 4 | I | S | |
| 0,5 | S | S | – | |
| EC191-07 TCS | 8 | I | S | |
| 1 | S | – | – | |
(R) resistant, (I) intermediate and (S) susceptible by disk diffusion test: Nalidixic Acid (NAL), Ciprofloxacin (CIP).
TC: transconjugants obtained using E. coli J53 as the recipient strain.
TCS: transconjugants obtained using Salmonella M1744 as the recipient strain.
Figure 1Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. Percentage of antimicrobial susceptibility in the isolates analyzed. (A) Fluoroquinolones, (B) β-lactams, and (C) Other antimicrobials. AMP, ampicillin; AMC, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid; CXM, cefuroxime; CTX, cefotaxime; CAZ, ceftazidime; CRO, ceftriaxone; CFT, ceftiofur; FEP, cefepime; FOX, cefoxitin; ATM, aztreonam; IMI, imipenem; MEM, meropenem; NAL, nalidixic acid; CIP, ciprofloxacin; ENR, Enrofloxacin; KAN, kanamycin; GEN, gentamicin; STR, streptomycin; AMI, amikacin; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; TET, tetracycline; and CLR, chloramphenicol.