BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that carbon dioxide has an impact on cognitive function performance of office workers at concentrations previously thought to be benign (1000-2500 ppm). The only available data for CO2 on the flight deck indicate that the average CO2 concentrations are typically <1000 ppm, but the 95th percentile concentration can be as high as 1400 ppm, depending on airplane type. METHODS: We recruited 30 active commercial airline pilots to fly three 3-h flight segments in an FAA-approved flight simulator with each segment at a different CO2 concentration on the flight deck (700, 1500, 2500 ppm). CO2 concentrations were modified by introducing ultra-pure CO2 into the simulator; ventilation rates remained the same for each segment. The pilots performed a range of predefined maneuvers of varying difficulty without the aid of autopilot, and were assessed by a FAA Designated Pilot Examiner according to FAA Practical Test Standards. Pilots and the Examiner were blinded to test conditions and the order of exposures was randomized. RESULTS: Compared to segments at a CO2 concentration of 2500 ppm, the odds of passing a maneuver as rated by the Examiner in the simulator were 1.52 (95% CI: 1.02-2.25) times higher when pilots were exposed to 1500 ppm and 1.69 (95% CI: 1.11-2.55) times higher when exposed to 700 ppm, controlling for maneuver difficulty, Examiner and order of maneuvers. DISCUSSION: Examiner rating captured a wider range of performance indicators than output from the flight simulator, which can characterize only a few quantitative aspects of the flight performance. More broadly, these findings suggest that there is a direct effect of carbon dioxide on performance, independent of ventilation, with implications for many other indoor environments that routinely experience CO2 concentrations above 1000 ppm.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that carbon dioxide has an impact on cognitive function performance of office workers at concentrations previously thought to be benign (1000-2500 ppm). The only available data for CO2 on the flight deck indicate that the average CO2 concentrations are typically <1000 ppm, but the 95th percentile concentration can be as high as 1400 ppm, depending on airplane type. METHODS: We recruited 30 active commercial airline pilots to fly three 3-h flight segments in an FAA-approved flight simulator with each segment at a different CO2 concentration on the flight deck (700, 1500, 2500 ppm). CO2 concentrations were modified by introducing ultra-pure CO2 into the simulator; ventilation rates remained the same for each segment. The pilots performed a range of predefined maneuvers of varying difficulty without the aid of autopilot, and were assessed by a FAA Designated Pilot Examiner according to FAA Practical Test Standards. Pilots and the Examiner were blinded to test conditions and the order of exposures was randomized. RESULTS: Compared to segments at a CO2 concentration of 2500 ppm, the odds of passing a maneuver as rated by the Examiner in the simulator were 1.52 (95% CI: 1.02-2.25) times higher when pilots were exposed to 1500 ppm and 1.69 (95% CI: 1.11-2.55) times higher when exposed to 700 ppm, controlling for maneuver difficulty, Examiner and order of maneuvers. DISCUSSION: Examiner rating captured a wider range of performance indicators than output from the flight simulator, which can characterize only a few quantitative aspects of the flight performance. More broadly, these findings suggest that there is a direct effect of carbon dioxide on performance, independent of ventilation, with implications for many other indoor environments that routinely experience CO2 concentrations above 1000 ppm.
Entities:
Keywords:
Airplanes; Carbon dioxide; Performance; Pilots
Authors: Jose Guillermo Cedeño Laurent; Piers MacNaughton; Emily Jones; Anna S Young; Maya Bliss; Skye Flanigan; Jose Vallarino; Ling Jyh Chen; Xiaodong Cao; Joseph G Allen Journal: Environ Res Lett Date: 2021-09-09 Impact factor: 6.793
Authors: Xiaodong Cao; Piers MacNaughton; Leslie R Cadet; Jose Guillermo Cedeno-Laurent; Skye Flanigan; Jose Vallarino; Deborah Donnelly-McLay; David C Christiani; John D Spengler; Joseph G Allen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jessica K Lee; Yiri De Dios; Igor Kofman; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Jacob J Bloomberg; Rachael D Seidler Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Michelle S M Rhee; Carin D Lindquist; Matthew T Silvestrini; Amanda C Chan; Jonathan J Y Ong; Vijay K Sharma Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2021-04-16 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Ana Paula Salazar; Kathleen E Hupfeld; Jessica K Lee; Nichole E Beltran; Igor S Kofman; Yiri E De Dios; Edwin Mulder; Jacob J Bloomberg; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Rachael D Seidler Journal: Front Syst Neurosci Date: 2020-07-28