OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether ablation of hidden substrate unmasked by right ventricular extrastimulation (RVE) improves ablation outcome of post-myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular tachycardia (VT). BACKGROUND: In patients with small or nontransmural scars after MI, part of the VT substrate may be functional and, in addition, masked by high-voltage far-field signals arising from adjacent normal myocardium. METHODS: In 60 consecutive patients, systematic analysis of electrograms recorded from the presumed infarct area was performed during sinus rhythm, RV pacing at 500 ms, and during a short-coupled RV extrastimulus. Sites showing low-voltage, near-field potentials with evoked conduction delay in response to RVE were targeted. RESULTS: In 37 (62%) patients, ablation target sites located in areas with normal voltage during sinus rhythm were unmasked by RVE (hidden substrate group). These patients had better left ventricular function (36 ± 11% vs. 26 ± 12%; p = 0.003), smaller electroanatomical scars (<1.5 mV), and smaller dense scars (<0.5 mV) (median 59 and 14 cm2 vs. 82 and 44 cm2; p = 0.044 and p = 0.003) than did those in whom no hidden substrate was identified (overt substrate group). During a median follow-up of 16 months, 13 (22%) patients had VT recurrence. Patients with hidden substrate had a lower incidence of VT recurrence (12-month VT-free survival 89% vs. 50% in patients with overt substrate; p = 0.005). Compared with a historical cohort of 90 post-MI patients matched for left ventricular function and electroanatomical scar area, in whom no RVE was performed, patients in the hidden substrate group had a higher 1-year VT-free survival (89% vs. 73%; p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Hidden substrate ablation unmasked by RVE improves ablation outcome in post-MI patients with small or nontransmural scars.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether ablation of hidden substrate unmasked by right ventricular extrastimulation (RVE) improves ablation outcome of post-myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular tachycardia (VT). BACKGROUND: In patients with small or nontransmural scars after MI, part of the VT substrate may be functional and, in addition, masked by high-voltage far-field signals arising from adjacent normal myocardium. METHODS: In 60 consecutive patients, systematic analysis of electrograms recorded from the presumed infarct area was performed during sinus rhythm, RV pacing at 500 ms, and during a short-coupled RV extrastimulus. Sites showing low-voltage, near-field potentials with evoked conduction delay in response to RVE were targeted. RESULTS: In 37 (62%) patients, ablation target sites located in areas with normal voltage during sinus rhythm were unmasked by RVE (hidden substrate group). These patients had better left ventricular function (36 ± 11% vs. 26 ± 12%; p = 0.003), smaller electroanatomical scars (<1.5 mV), and smaller dense scars (<0.5 mV) (median 59 and 14 cm2 vs. 82 and 44 cm2; p = 0.044 and p = 0.003) than did those in whom no hidden substrate was identified (overt substrate group). During a median follow-up of 16 months, 13 (22%) patients had VT recurrence. Patients with hidden substrate had a lower incidence of VT recurrence (12-month VT-free survival 89% vs. 50% in patients with overt substrate; p = 0.005). Compared with a historical cohort of 90 post-MI patients matched for left ventricular function and electroanatomical scar area, in whom no RVE was performed, patients in the hidden substrate group had a higher 1-year VT-free survival (89% vs. 73%; p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Hidden substrate ablation unmasked by RVE improves ablation outcome in post-MI patients with small or nontransmural scars.
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: Europace Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Neil T Srinivasan; Jason Garcia; Richard J Schilling; Syed Ahsan; Girish G Babu; Richard Ang; Mehul B Dhinoja; Ross J Hunter; Martin Lowe; Anthony W Chow; Pier D Lambiase Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2020-09-16
Authors: Karl Magtibay; Stéphane Massé; Ahmed Niri; Robert D Anderson; Ram B Kumar; D Curtis Deno; Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar Journal: Heart Rhythm O2 Date: 2021-09-04
Authors: Neil T Srinivasan; Jason Garcia; Richard J Schilling; Syed Ahsan; Ross J Hunter; Martin Lowe; Anthony W Chow; Pier D Lambiase Journal: Heart Rhythm O2 Date: 2021-05-11