Literature DB >> 30089282

In Current Clinical Practice, after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Are β-Blockers Prescribed for Heart Failure or as Secondary Prevention? A Pilot Study.

Vidar Ruddox1, Jan Erik Otterstad1, Dan Atar2,3, Bjørn Bendz2,3, Thor Edvardsen2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patients surviving an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are different today than when oral β-blockers first were shown to have an incremental effect on mortality. They are now, as opposed to then, offered revascularization procedures and effective secondary prevention. In this pilot-study, we aimed to explore the prescription of β-blockers to these patients stratified by their left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
METHODS: Consecutive stable patients treated with a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure following an AMI were included for measurement of LVEF after 1-5 days. β-Blocker treatment was recorded at inclusion and after 3 months.
RESULTS: We included 159 patients, 89% with LVEF ≥40% (56% had a LVEF ≥50% [preserved], 33% LVEF 40-49% [mid-range] and 11% LVEF <40% [reduced]). At discharge the prescription rates of β-blockers according to LVEF stratification were 79% for preserved, 79% for mid-range and 94% for reduced LVEF. After 3 months 72% of all patients continued such treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study, a large proportion of contemporary managed patients with AMI but without clinical heart failure does not have reduced LVEF shortly after PCI, but the majority is still treated with a β-blocker.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myocardial infarction; Secondary prophylaxis; β-Blocker

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30089282     DOI: 10.1159/000490656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiology        ISSN: 0008-6312            Impact factor:   1.869


  2 in total

1.  The impact of semi-automatic versus manually adjusted assessment of global longitudinal strain in post-myocardial infarction patients.

Authors:  Jan Erik Otterstad; Ingvild Billehaug Norum; Vidar Ruddox; Bjørn Bendz; Kristina H Haugaa; Thor Edvardsen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Prognostic impact of non-improvement of global longitudinal strain in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jan Erik Otterstad; Ingvild Billehaug Norum; Vidar Ruddox; An Chau Maria Le; Bjørn Bendz; John Munkhaugen; Ole Klungsøyr; Thor Edvardsen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 2.357

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.