Stanislav Lazarev1, Camille Hardy-Abeloos1, Oren Factor1, Kenneth Rosenzweig1, Michael Buckstein2. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1184 5th Ave, New York, NY, 10029, USA. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1184 5th Ave, New York, NY, 10029, USA. michael.buckstein@mountsinai.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (CL-HCC). METHODS: Fifty-three patients with CL-HCC were treated with SBRT from 2011 to 2017 in our institution. CL-HCC was defined as a tumor sited in segments 4, 5, or 8 adjacent to the hepatic hilum, or < 1.5 cm from main portal branches. Primary endpoints were treatment response, local control (LC), and hepatobiliary toxicity (HBT). RESULTS: Thirty-three (62.3%) patients had Child-Turcotte-Pugh score A, 20 (37.77%)-score B. Albumin-bilirubin grade 1 constituted 6 (11.3%) cases, grade 2-32 (60.4%), grade 3-15 (28.3%). Median tumor diameter was 34 mm. Median BED10 was 72 Gy. Complete/partial response was observed in 40 (75.5%) lesions, stable disease-in 9 (17.0%). At a median follow-up of 12.2 months, there were 6 (11.3%) local failures. The actuarial 2-year LC rate was 87.9%. 2-year LC was better with higher BED10 (> 70 vs ≤ 70 Gy) 96.9 vs 72.5%, p = 0.01. The 2-year rates for disease-specific and overall survival were 53.2 and 39.1%, respectively. The incidence of any Grade ≥ 3 AE was 9 (17.0%). There were no grade 5 AEs. There was a trend toward an increased risk of grade ≥ 3 AE with mean liver dose > 10 Gy (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: In the present cohort, SBRT to the CL-HCC produced excellent treatment response with acceptable HBT and LC. Select HCC patients who are not candidates for surgery or other locoregional therapies can be considered for SBRT to the central liver.
PURPOSE: To examine safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (CL-HCC). METHODS: Fifty-three patients with CL-HCC were treated with SBRT from 2011 to 2017 in our institution. CL-HCC was defined as a tumor sited in segments 4, 5, or 8 adjacent to the hepatic hilum, or < 1.5 cm from main portal branches. Primary endpoints were treatment response, local control (LC), and hepatobiliary toxicity (HBT). RESULTS: Thirty-three (62.3%) patients had Child-Turcotte-Pugh score A, 20 (37.77%)-score B. Albumin-bilirubin grade 1 constituted 6 (11.3%) cases, grade 2-32 (60.4%), grade 3-15 (28.3%). Median tumor diameter was 34 mm. Median BED10 was 72 Gy. Complete/partial response was observed in 40 (75.5%) lesions, stable disease-in 9 (17.0%). At a median follow-up of 12.2 months, there were 6 (11.3%) local failures. The actuarial 2-year LC rate was 87.9%. 2-year LC was better with higher BED10 (> 70 vs ≤ 70 Gy) 96.9 vs 72.5%, p = 0.01. The 2-year rates for disease-specific and overall survival were 53.2 and 39.1%, respectively. The incidence of any Grade ≥ 3 AE was 9 (17.0%). There were no grade 5 AEs. There was a trend toward an increased risk of grade ≥ 3 AE with mean liver dose > 10 Gy (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: In the present cohort, SBRT to the CL-HCC produced excellent treatment response with acceptable HBT and LC. Select HCCpatients who are not candidates for surgery or other locoregional therapies can be considered for SBRT to the central liver.
Entities:
Keywords:
Central liver; Hepatobiliary toxicity; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Local control; Stereotactic body radiation therapy
Authors: Alexis Bujold; Christine A Massey; John J Kim; James Brierley; Charles Cho; Rebecca K S Wong; Rob E Dinniwell; Zahra Kassam; Jolie Ringash; Bernard Cummings; Jenna Sykes; Morris Sherman; Jennifer J Knox; Laura A Dawson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-04-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Daniel R Wahl; Matthew H Stenmark; Yebin Tao; Erqi L Pollom; Elaine M Caoili; Theodore S Lawrence; Matthew J Schipper; Mary Feng Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alejandra Méndez Romero; Wouter Wunderink; Shahid M Hussain; Jacco A De Pooter; Ben J M Heijmen; Peter C J M Nowak; Joost J Nuyttens; Rene P Brandwijk; Cees Verhoef; Jan N M Ijzermans; Peter C Levendag Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2006 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: Jung Hyun Kwon; Si Hyun Bae; Ji Yoon Kim; Byung Ock Choi; Hong Seok Jang; Jeong Won Jang; Jong Young Choi; Seung Kew Yoon; Kyu Won Chung Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-09-03 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Regina V Tse; Maria Hawkins; Gina Lockwood; John J Kim; Bernard Cummings; Jennifer Knox; Morris Sherman; Laura A Dawson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-01-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Eleni Gkika; Michael Schultheiss; Dominik Bettinger; Lars Maruschke; Hannes Philipp Neeff; Michaela Schulenburg; Sonja Adebahr; Simon Kirste; Ursula Nestle; Robert Thimme; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Thomas Baptist Brunner Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Won Il Jang; Mi-Sook Kim; Sun Hyun Bae; Chul Koo Cho; Hyung Jun Yoo; Young Seok Seo; Jin-Kyu Kang; So Young Kim; Dong Han Lee; Chul Ju Han; Jin Kim; Su Cheol Park; Sang Bum Kim; Eung-Ho Cho; Young Han Kim Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2013-10-27 Impact factor: 3.481