| Literature DB >> 30087905 |
Anna E van Beek1,2, Isatou Sarr3, Simon Correa3, Davis Nwakanma3, Mieke C Brouwer1, Diana Wouters1, Fatou Secka3, Suzanne T B Anderson3, David J Conway4, Michael Walther3, Michael Levin5, Taco W Kuijpers2,6, Aubrey J Cunnington5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plasmodium falciparum may evade complement-mediated host defense by hijacking complement Factor H (FH), a negative regulator of the alternative complement pathway. Plasma levels of FH vary between individuals and may therefore influence malaria susceptibility and severity.Entities:
Keywords: complement Factor H; malaria; severity; susceptibility
Year: 2018 PMID: 30087905 PMCID: PMC6059171 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofy166
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis ISSN: 2328-8957 Impact factor: 3.835
Figure 1.Factor H (FH) plasma levels associate with malaria susceptibility and severity. A, FH was measured by in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in samples from healthy community control children (HC; n = 173) and in samples obtained 28 days after hospital presentation from children with uncomplicated malaria (UM; n = 67) and severe malaria (SM; n = 82). P values indicate Tukey’s multiple comparisons test performed after 1-way analysis of variance. B, Severe malaria was categorized based on major criteria of severity: severe prostration (SP; n = 69), hyperlactatemia (LA; n = 48), severe anemia (SA; n = 14), and cerebral malaria (CM; n = 29). Due to overlapping clinical features, depicted groups are not mutually exclusive. Unpaired t tests compare the mean of each group with uncomplicated malaria. Bars indicate mean ± SD.
Figure 2.Factor H (FH) plasma levels associate with severity markers. A–D, Correlations of FH plasma levels with severity markers at the time of presentation to hospital: (A) lactate, (B) platelets, (C) hemoglobin (Hb), (D) parasitemia (% of infected erythrocytes in blood film), (E) parasite density, (F) PfHRP2, (G) sequestration index [log (PfHRP2/parasitemia)]. Spearman’s correlations.
Logistic Regression Models to Predict Severity
| Model | Variable | No. | Log Odds | SE |
| AIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Age | 149 | –0.37 | 0.069 | 5.3 × 10-8 | 165 |
| Log PfHRP2 | Log PfHRP2 | 104 | 1.06 | 0.25 | 2.2 × 10-5 | 127 |
| FH | FH | 149 | 0.0066 | 0.0023 | .0047 | 205 |
| Age + log PfHRP2 + FH | Age | 104 | –0.45 | 0.11 | 2.68 × 10-5 | 87 |
| Log PfHRP2 | 0.91 | 0.27 | .00098 | |||
| FH | 0.01 | 0.0045 | .00133 |
Age, PfHRP2, and FH were assessed individually or combined in a multivariate model to predict severity.
Abbreviations: AIC, Akaike Information Criterion; FH, Factor H.
Linear Regression Model to Predict Blood Lactate Concentration
| Model | Variable | No. | Coefficient | SE |
| AIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Age | 138 | –0.11 | 0.015 | 3.02 × 10-11 | 263 |
| Log PfHRP2 | Log PfHRP2 | 100 | 0.23 | 0.036 | 6.7 × 10-9 | 166 |
| FH | FH | 138 | 0.002 | 0.00077 | .0094 | 301 |
| Age + log PfHRP2 + FH | Age | 100 | –0.073 | 0.012 | 7.4 × 10-8 | 131 |
| Log PfHRP2 | 0.18 | 0.030 | 3.5 × 10-8 | |||
| FH | 0.0021 | 0.00063 | .0011 |
Age, PfHRP2, and FH were assessed individually or combined in a multivariate model to predict ln (lactate).
Abbreviations: AIC, Akaike Information Criterion; FH, Factor H.