Literature DB >> 30087880

Evaluating the Potential Reutilizing of Fly Ash and Bottom Ash in Thailand.

Khamphe Phoungthong1,2, Kuaanan Techato1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30087880      PMCID: PMC6077634     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Public Health        ISSN: 2251-6085            Impact factor:   1.429


× No keyword cloud information.

Dear Editor-in-Chief

Thailand produces about 10 million tonnes of ash as solid waste which comprises of fly ash (FA), bottom ash (BA) and other incineration power plant residues (1). Since 2000, the incineration residues have been promoted in Thailand, according to the information from the Government of Thailand. “Utilization of incineration residues can provide environmental benefits by decreasing the need for landfill and reducing raw material extraction” (2, 3). In the present work, we report the elementals concentrations of FA and BA generated from municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) in Thailand. Reutilizing of FA and BA, which is otherwise applications are environmental benefits (2–4). Therefore, the major aim was to investigate their use as an alternative material to replace traditional materials or natural materials with the regulatory limit values for utilization. Unfortunately, from the results of chemical compositions of FA and BA, the ash samples tracing elements of As, Ba, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn are enriched predominantly for FA, while Ba, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb and Zn are the most abundant elements for BA (Table 1).
Table 1:

Comparison of chemical composition of the FA and BA samples in this study and selected references with limit values

Elemental content(mg/kg)This studyAsh samplesLimit values (7)
FABAFA1 (4)FA2 (5)BA1 (4)BA2 (6)
AgNDNDNDNDNDND500
As3.74ND44.227.057.1ND500
BNDNDNDNDNDND
Ba7.391143594051240ND10000
BeNDND6.426.001.78ND
BiNDNDNDNDNDND
Cd59.6ND1.01ND4.917.00100
CoNDNDND26.0NDND8000
Cr21.541.765.8103330143500
Cu93.916356.034.0167011282500
HgND936NDNDNDND20
MnNDND213ND705ND
NiND5.9326.878.013179.42000
Pb56846.886.9ND482ND1000
SeNDND16.813.01.60ND100
SrNDND544ND219ND
TINDNDNDNDNDND700
VND0.0614014144.7ND2400
Zn258826981.975.0210018725000

Note: ND is for not detectable and – not applicable.

Comparison of chemical composition of the FA and BA samples in this study and selected references with limit values Note: ND is for not detectable and – not applicable. In the BA, the constituent contents were relatively higher than in FA except for Pb and Zn. The constituents in the FA and BA were in the range of 0.06–2588 mg/kg, for heavy metals including of Ba (7.39–114 mg/kg), Cd (59.6 mg/kg), Cr (21.5–41.7 mg/kg), Cu (93.9–163 mg/kg), Ni (5.93 mg/kg), Pb (46.8–568 mg/kg) and Zn (269–2588 mg/kg). Other metals were found in minor or trace amounts and below the detection limit in the analysis for both FA and BA. The quality of ashes depended on the waste compositions and conditions of the incinerator (2–4). The contents of constituents were higher than those in the ash residues from other countries. Comparatively, Hg in BA has exceeded the regulatory limits according to the notification of the Thai standard for disposal of wastes or unusable materials (7). Therefore the BA sample was classified as a hazardous material. BA is considered as a waste with possibility to pollute the environment and requires an appropriated disposal. Furthermore, Cd in FA was less than the limits but still high about 50 times than those from other countries. The utilization of these residues is restricted by environmental concerns in Thailand because such solid waste residues commonly contain more potentially toxic trace elements than the natural and traditional materials they replace. Due to a large number of solid waste residues, especially FA and BA were generated by MSWI power plant and coal-fired power plant in Thailand. Many times we take these ashes were used with neglected or did not check chemical characteristics before. Of course, these hazardous elements may be leached out that could pose an environmental and human health risk posed by the residues. Overall, there is a warning about the environmental risks resulting from FA and BA could be contaminated. Although FA and BA were suitable for the applications examined, their characteristics varied significantly depending on their site of origin. The evaluation of environmental impacts and risks associated with FA and BA needs to be performed prior to utilization of these materials. Effective environmental monitoring and protection must be carried out to ensure that FA and BA utilization and disposal does not become an environmental hazard.
  3 in total

1.  Heavy metal release from different ashes during serial batch tests using water and acid.

Authors:  Bernard Ludwig; Partap Khanna; Jürgen Prenzel; Friedrich Beese
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 7.145

2.  Phytotoxicity and groundwater impacts of leaching from thermal treatment residues in roadways.

Authors:  Khamphe Phoungthong; Li-Ming Shao; Pin-Jing He; Hua Zhang
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 5.565

3.  Variation of the phytotoxicity of municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seed germination with leaching conditions.

Authors:  Khamphe Phoungthong; Hua Zhang; Li-Ming Shao; Pin-Jing He
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 7.086

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.