Literature DB >> 30086681

Migraine-related disability, impact, and health-related quality of life among patients with episodic migraine receiving preventive treatment with erenumab.

Dawn C Buse1, Richard B Lipton1, Yngve Hallström2, Uwe Reuter3, Stewart J Tepper4, Feng Zhang5, Sandhya Sapra6, Hernan Picard7, Daniel D Mikol7, Robert A Lenz7.   

Abstract

Background We evaluated the effect of erenumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits the canonical calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, on migraine-related disability, impact, and health-related quality of life among patients with episodic migraine. Methods Patients enrolled in a phase 3, 6-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of once-monthly erenumab 70 and 140 mg for migraine prevention (STRIVE) used an eDiary during the baseline and double-blind treatment phases to complete validated, specific questionnaires, including the modified (monthly) Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire; Headache Impact Test; and Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire-role function-restrictive (MSQ-RFR), -role function-preventive (MSQ-RFP), and -emotional function (MSQ-EF). Results A total of 955 patients were randomized to receive erenumab 70 mg (n = 317), erenumab 140 mg (n = 319), or placebo (n = 319). Erenumab versus placebo resulted in significantly greater improvements in all patient-reported outcomes; changes from baseline were numerically higher with 140 mg erenumab. Improvements occurred rapidly and were maintained over 6 months of treatment. Between-group differences from placebo over months 4-6 for the 70- and 140-mg dose groups were, respectively, -2.1 and -2.8 for modified (monthly) Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire, -2.1 and -2.3 for Headache Impact Test, 5.1 and 6.5 for MSQ-RFR, 4.2 and 5.4 for MSQ-RFP, and 5.2 and 6.7 for MSQ-EF ( p < 0.001 for all). Erenumab also significantly reduced the proportion of patients with severe and very severe migraine-related disability and increased the proportion of patients with clinically meaningful improvements in migraine-related impact and health-related quality of life. Conclusion Erenumab reduced migraine disability and impact and improved patients' health-related quality of life, reinforcing its role as a promising new therapy for migraine prevention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Episodic migraine; erenumab; headache impact; health-related quality of life; migraine-related disability; preventive migraine therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30086681     DOI: 10.1177/0333102418789072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cephalalgia        ISSN: 0333-1024            Impact factor:   6.292


  17 in total

1.  Erenumab for Preventive Treatment of Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Simona Lattanzi; Francesco Brigo; Eugen Trinka; Fabrizio Vernieri; Tommaso Corradetti; Mauro Dobran; Mauro Silvestrini
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Cost-Effectiveness of Erenumab for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine in Patients with Prior Treatment Failures in Sweden.

Authors:  Ronan Mahon; Andrea Lang; Pamela Vo; Jasper Huels; Philip Cooney; Andriy Danyliv; Umakanth Vudumula; Sreelatha Vadapalle; Farooq Maniyar; Peter J Goadsby
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Learning the full impact of migraine through patient voices: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Paige M Estave; Summerlyn Beeghly; Reid Anderson; Caitlyn Margol; Mariam Shakir; Geena George; Anissa Berger; Nathaniel O'Connell; Rebecca Burch; Niina Haas; Scott W Powers; Elizabeth Seng; Dawn C Buse; Richard B Lipton; Rebecca Erwin Wells
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 5.311

4.  Curcumin Protects Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells against H2O2-Induced Cell Injury.

Authors:  Jipeng Ouyang; Rong Li; Haiqin Shi; Jianping Zhong
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Erenumab for the Prevention of Episodic Migraine in Japanese Adults.

Authors:  Fumihiko Sakai; Takao Takeshima; Yoshihisa Tatsuoka; Koichi Hirata; Robert Lenz; Yi Wang; Sunfa Cheng; Toshiyasu Hirama; Daniel D Mikol
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 5.887

6.  Associations Between Headache-Free Days and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Migraine Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Survey Data in Europe.

Authors:  Michael J Doane; Shaloo Gupta; Pamela Vo; Annik K Laflamme; Juanzhi Fang
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2019-07-26

7.  The Public's Perception of Interventions for Migraine Headache Disorders: A Crowdsourcing Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Orr Shauly; Daniel J Gould; Ketan M Patel
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2019-04-02

8.  The Impact of OnabotulinumtoxinA vs. Placebo on Efficacy Outcomes in Headache Day Responder and Nonresponder Patients with Chronic Migraine.

Authors:  Stephen D Silberstein; Hans-Christoph Diener; David W Dodick; Aubrey Manack Adams; Ronald E DeGryse; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2020-10-07

9.  The Spectrum of Response to Erenumab in Patients With Episodic Migraine and Subgroup Analysis of Patients Achieving ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% Response.

Authors:  Gregor Broessner; Uwe Reuter; Jo H Bonner; David W Dodick; Yngve Hallström; Hernan Picard; Feng Zhang; Robert A Lenz; Jan Klatt; Daniel D Mikol
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 5.887

10.  Patient-Reported Outcomes for Migraine in the US and Europe: Burden Associated with Multiple Preventive Treatment Failures.

Authors:  Janet Ford; Russell M Nichols; Wenyu Ye; Antje Tockhorn-Heidenreich; Sarah Cotton; James Jackson
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.