Kirtie Ramdas1, Charlotte van Lee1, Samuel Beck2, Patrick Bindels3, Vincent Noordhoek Hegt4, Luba Pardo1, Sarah Versnel5, Tamar Nijsten1, Renate van den Bos1. 1. Department of Dermatology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 2. Leiden Cytology and Pathology Laboratory - Pathan, Rijswijk, the Netherlands. 3. Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 5. Department of Plastic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Due to the increasing incidence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and rising health care costs, health care insurance companies seek ways to shift skin surgery for BCC from secondary to primary care. OBJECTIVES: To study the differences in complete excision of BCC by general practitioners (GPs), dermatologists, and plastic surgeons. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study of pathology records of 2,986 standard excisions of primary BCCs performed by a GP, dermatologist, or plastic surgeon in the area of Southwest Netherlands between 2008 and 2014. To compare the risk of an incomplete BCC excision between the specialties, the odds ratio (OR) was used adjusted for patient age, sex, tumor site, size, and histological subtype. RESULTS: BCCs were completely excised by GPs in 70%, which was lower than the 93% by dermatologists and 83% by plastic surgeons (p < 0.001). Compared to the dermatologist, BCCs which were excised by a GP were 6 times higher at risk of an incomplete excision (adjusted OR 6, 95% CI 5-8) and 2 times higher at risk when excised by a plastic surgeon (adjusted OR 2, 95% CI 2-3). CONCLUSION: BCCs were more often completely excised by dermatologists than by GPs and plastic surgeons. Dermatologists probably perform better because of their extensive training and high experience in BCC care. To minimize incomplete BCC excision, GPs should receive specific training before the shift of BCC care from secondary to primary care is justifiable.
BACKGROUND: Due to the increasing incidence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and rising health care costs, health care insurance companies seek ways to shift skin surgery for BCC from secondary to primary care. OBJECTIVES: To study the differences in complete excision of BCC by general practitioners (GPs), dermatologists, and plastic surgeons. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study of pathology records of 2,986 standard excisions of primary BCCs performed by a GP, dermatologist, or plastic surgeon in the area of Southwest Netherlands between 2008 and 2014. To compare the risk of an incomplete BCC excision between the specialties, the odds ratio (OR) was used adjusted for patient age, sex, tumor site, size, and histological subtype. RESULTS: BCCs were completely excised by GPs in 70%, which was lower than the 93% by dermatologists and 83% by plastic surgeons (p < 0.001). Compared to the dermatologist, BCCs which were excised by a GP were 6 times higher at risk of an incomplete excision (adjusted OR 6, 95% CI 5-8) and 2 times higher at risk when excised by a plastic surgeon (adjusted OR 2, 95% CI 2-3). CONCLUSION: BCCs were more often completely excised by dermatologists than by GPs and plastic surgeons. Dermatologists probably perform better because of their extensive training and high experience in BCC care. To minimize incomplete BCC excision, GPs should receive specific training before the shift of BCC care from secondary to primary care is justifiable.
Keywords:
Basal cell carcinoma; Comparative study; Dermatologists; General practitioners; Margins of excision; Medicine; Physicians; Plastic surgeons; Quality of health care; Surgery
Authors: M H Roozeboom; K Mosterd; V J L Winnepenninckx; P J Nelemans; N W J Kelleners-Smeets Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2012-06-13 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Marieke H Roozeboom; Hilke Kreukels; Patty J Nelemans; Klara Mosterd; Veronique J L Winnepenninckx; Myrurgia A Abdul Hamid; Ellen R M de Haas; Nicole W J Kelleners-Smeets Journal: Acta Derm Venereol Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 4.437
Authors: Sophie C Flohil; Inge Seubring; Michelle M van Rossum; Jan-Willem W Coebergh; Esther de Vries; Tamar Nijsten Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Nicole W J Smeets; Gertruud A M Krekels; Judith U Ostertag; Brigitte A B Essers; Carmen D Dirksen; Fred H M Nieman; H A Martino Neumann Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Nov 13-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Christel E van Dijk; Robert A Verheij; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Peter P Groenewegen; Dinny H de Bakker Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-01-04 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Cecile J L Koelink; Boudewijn J Kollen; Feikje Groenhof; Klaas van der Meer; Wouter K van der Heide Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Sven van Egmond; Marlies Wakkee; Marit Hoogenraad; Ida J Korfage; Marc A M Mureau; Marjolein Lugtenberg Journal: Arch Dermatol Res Date: 2021-02-21 Impact factor: 3.017