| Literature DB >> 30086385 |
Ying-Jie Peng1, Vladislav V Makarenko2, Anna Gridina2, Irina Chupikova2, Xiuli Zhang2, Ganesh K Kumar2, Aaron P Fox2, Nanduri R Prabhakar2.
Abstract
The role of cystathionine-γ-lyase (CSE) derived H2S in the hypoxic and anoxic responses of the carotid body (CB) were examined. Experiments were performed on Sprague-Dawley rats, wild type and CSE knockout mice on C57BL/6 J background. Hypoxia (pO2 = 37 ± 3 mmHg) increased the CB sensory nerve activity and elevated H2S levels in rats. In contrast, anoxia (pO2 = 5 ± 4 mmHg) produced only a modest CB sensory excitation with no change in H2S levels. DL-propargylglycine (DL-PAG), a blocker of CSE, inhibited hypoxia but not anoxia-evoked CB sensory excitation and [Ca2+]i elevation of glomus cells. The inhibitory effects of DL-PAG on hypoxia were seen: a) when it is dissolved in saline but not in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and b) in glomus cells cultured for18 h but not in cells either soon after isolation or after prolonged culturing (72 h) requiring 1-3 h of incubation. On the other hand, anoxia-induced [Ca2+]i responses of glomus cell were blocked by high concentration of DL-PAG (300μM) either alone or in combination with aminooxyacetic acid (AOAA; 300μM) with a decreased cell viability. Anoxia produced a weak CB sensory excitation and robust [Ca2+]i elevation in glomus cells of both wild-type and CSE null mice. As compared to wild-type, CSE null mice exhibited impaired CB chemo reflex as evidenced by attenuated efferent phrenic nerve responses to brief hyperoxia (Dejours test), and hypoxia. Inhalation of 100% N2 (anoxia) depressed breathing in both CSE null and wild-type mice. These observations demonstrate that a) hypoxia and anoxia are not analogous stimuli for studying CB physiology and b) CSE-derived H2S contributes to CB response to hypoxia but not to that of anoxia.Entities:
Keywords: Carotid body chemo reflex; Cystathionine-γ-lyase; H(2)S synthesis inhibitors; Hypoxic ventilatory response
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30086385 PMCID: PMC6252114 DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2018.08.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Physiol Neurobiol ISSN: 1569-9048 Impact factor: 1.931