Literature DB >> 30086053

Impact of Tumor Deposits on Oncologic Outcomes in Stage III Colon Cancer.

Nathalie Wong-Chong1,2, Jill Motl1, Grace Hwang1, George J Nassif1, Matthew R Albert1, John R T Monson1, Lawrence Lee1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of tumor deposits in stage III colon adenocarcinoma is poorly described.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of tumor deposits on oncologic outcomes in patients with stage III colon cancer.
DESIGN: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: The 2010 to 2014 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with resected stage III colon adenocarcinoma on final pathology. PATIENTS: Patients were divided into 3 groups: lymph nodes+tumor deposits-, lymph nodes+tumor deposits+, and lymph nodes-tumor deposits+. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was 5-year overall survival.
RESULTS: Of 74,577 patients, there were 55,800 patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits-, 13,740 patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits+, and 5037 patients with lymph nodes-tumor deposits+. The groups had similar patient and facility characteristics, but patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits+ had more advanced tumor characteristics. Patients with lymph nodes-tumor deposits+ were less likely to receive adjuvant systemic therapy (52% vs 74% lymph nodes+tumor deposits- and 75% lymph nodes+tumor deposits+, p < 0.001) and had a longer delay to initiation of adjuvant treatment (>8 weeks; 43% vs 33% lymph nodes+tumor deposits- and 33% lymph nodes+tumor deposits+, p < 0.001). Patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits+ had the lowest 5-year overall survival (46.0% vs 63.4% lymph nodes+tumor deposits- vs 61.9% lymph nodes-tumor deposits+, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients with lymph nodes-tumor deposits+ had similar 5-year overall survival compared with patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits- with ≤3 positive lymph nodes (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-1.01). Patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits+ had worse prognosis regardless of the number of involved lymph nodes (≤3 +lymph nodes: HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.28-1.47 and ≥4 +lymph nodes: HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.22-1.38). Of those not receiving adjuvant treatment, patients with lymph nodes-tumor deposits+ were younger and had more adverse tumor features than lymph node+ disease. Lymph nodes-tumor deposits+ was independently associated with less delivery of adjuvant systemic therapy (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.80-0.82). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective analysis of a prospective database.
CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of patients with N1c disease is similar to nodal involvement without tumor deposits, yet these patients were less likely to receive adjuvant systemic therapy. Improvement in the delivery of appropriate care in these patients may increase survival and should be a target of future quality initiatives. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A666.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30086053     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of model fit and discriminatory ability of the 8th edition of the tumor-node-metastasis classification and the 9th edition of the Japanese classification to identify stage III colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kei Kitamura; Dai Shida; Shigeki Sekine; Yuka Ahiko; Yuya Nakamura; Konosuke Moritani; Shunsuke Tsukamoto; Yukihide Kanemitsu
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Utility of texture analysis on T2-weighted MR for differentiating tumor deposits from mesorectal nodes in rectal cancer patients, in a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Isha D Atre; Kulyada Eurboonyanun; Yoshifumi Noda; Anushri Parakh; Aileen O'Shea; Rita Maria Lahoud; Naomi M Sell; Hiroko Kunitake; Mukesh G Harisinghani
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-22

3.  Prognostic value of tumor deposits for long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with stage III colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jae Young Moon; Min Ro Lee; Gi Won Ha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Predictive and Prognostic Factors of Synchronous Colorectal Lung-Limited Metastasis.

Authors:  Yuqiang Li; Zhongyi Zhou; Da Liu; Ming Zhou; Fengbo Tan; Wenxue Liu; Hong Zhu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.260

5.  Tumor Deposits in Stage III Colon Cancer: Correlation With Other Histopathologic Variables, Prognostic Value, and Risk Stratification-Time to Consider "N2c".

Authors:  Victor E Pricolo; Jon Steingrimsson; Tracey J McDuffie; Joshua M McHale; Brian McMillen; Mark Shparber
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.787

6.  A Modified Pathological N Stage Including Status of Tumor Deposits in Colorectal Cancer With Nodal Metastasis.

Authors:  Jun-Peng Pei; Chun-Dong Zhang; Yu Liang; Cheng Zhang; Kun-Zhe Wu; Yong-Zhi Li; Zhe-Ming Zhao; Dong-Qiu Dai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  The value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Wenhao Wu; Xianbin Zhang; Shun Zeng; Peng Liu; Tong Qiu; Shulin Li; Peng Gong
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 8.  Beyond N staging in colorectal cancer: Current approaches and future perspectives.

Authors:  Gianluca Arrichiello; Mario Pirozzi; Bianca Arianna Facchini; Sergio Facchini; Fernando Paragliola; Valeria Nacca; Antonella Nicastro; Maria Anna Canciello; Adele Orlando; Marianna Caterino; Davide Ciardiello; Carminia Maria Della Corte; Morena Fasano; Stefania Napolitano; Teresa Troiani; Fortunato Ciardiello; Giulia Martini; Erika Martinelli
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 5.738

9.  Combining tumor deposits with the number of lymph node metastases to improve the prognostic accuracy in stage III colon cancer: a post hoc analysis of the CALGB/SWOG 80702 phase III study (Alliance).

Authors:  R Cohen; Q Shi; J Meyers; Z Jin; M Svrcek; C Fuchs; F Couture; P Kuebler; K K Ciombor; J Bendell; A De Jesus-Acosta; P Kumar; D Lewis; B Tan; M M Bertagnolli; P Philip; C Blanke; E M O'Reilly; A Shields; J A Meyerhardt
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 51.769

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.