Literature DB >> 30085831

The synchrony effect revisited: chronotype, time of day and cognitive performance in a semantic analogy task.

Kati Nowack1, Elke Van Der Meer2,3.   

Abstract

The synchrony effect (i.e. superior performance at optimal, inferior performance at suboptimal times of day) has been broadly studied within the context of circadian rhythms. Whether one chronotype copes better with the synchrony effect than the other received only insufficient empirical attention. We report on an applied experimental study investigating the impact of chronotype on the synchrony effect in a semantic analogy task. To detect an analogy, 36 participants (12 males) aged between 18 and 40 had to decide whether the relation between events of a source pair was mirrored by the relation between events of a target pair (e.g. to cook: to eat = to saddle: to ride). Temporal orientation of the relation within each event pair was varied corresponding either to the chronological or reverse order. Response times (RTs), error rates, as well as the psychophysiological parameters pre-experimental pupil baseline and peak pupil dilation replicate findings of a synchrony effect (shorter RTs and allocation of less cognitive resources at optimal times of day) and show an impact of chronotype (morning types generally outperforming evening types). Most importantly, morning types appeared to cope better with the synchrony effect than evening types: At suboptimal times, morning types solved the analogy detection task more efficient; that is faster with the same accuracy and without the investment of more cognitive resources. They also showed greater alertness and wakefulness indexed by greater pre-experimental pupil baselines. At optimal times of day, morning types have more cognitive resources available to allocate these to the more demanding conditions to outperform evening types. We interpret these findings to suggest that morning types are more able to adapt to unfavourable circumstances (for instance, by avoiding wasteful resource allocation when there are less cognitive resources available). Evening types appear less able to adapt to suboptimal times than morning types, because they have to deal with social jetlag and decreased self-control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Morningness/eveningness; cognitive resource allocation; pupillary response; social jetlag; time succession

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30085831     DOI: 10.1080/07420528.2018.1500477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronobiol Int        ISSN: 0742-0528            Impact factor:   2.877


  4 in total

1.  Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality.

Authors:  Sergii Yaremenko; Melanie Sauerland; Lorraine Hope
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Comparative analysis of sleep patterns and attention components in high school and college adolescents.

Authors:  Fernanda Mayara Crispim Diogo; Sabinne Danielle Galina; Maria Luiza Cruz de Oliveira; Pablo Valdez; Carolina Virginia Macêdo de Azevedo
Journal:  Sleep Sci       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar

3.  Time-of-day effects on eyewitness reports in morning and evening types.

Authors:  Sergii Yaremenko; Melanie Sauerland; Lorraine Hope
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2022-03-09

4.  An Ultra-Short Measure of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness Is Related to Circadian Biological Rhythms: The French Psychometric Validation of the Barcelona Sleepiness Index.

Authors:  Julien Coelho; Régis Lopez; Jacques Taillard; Emmanuel D'Incau; Guillaume Fond; Pierre Philip; Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.