Literature DB >> 30085140

Optimal treatment of MSSA bacteraemias: a meta-analysis of cefazolin versus antistaphylococcal penicillins.

Monique R Bidell1, Nimish Patel1, J Nicholas O'Donnell1.   

Abstract

Background: Bacteraemias caused by MSSA are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Controversy exists over the optimal treatment of severe infections caused by MSSA. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to identify whether differences in clinical outcomes exist between cefazolin and antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs).
Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase were systematically searched for publications reporting clinical outcomes of cefazolin and ASPs for adult patients with MSSA bacteraemias throughout November 2017. Comparative studies reporting 90 day mortality associated with each treatment were included. Random effects models were used to evaluate the impact of directed treatment agent on the odds of 30 and 90 day mortality, clinical failure, discontinuation due to adverse effects and infection recurrence.
Results: Five hundred and ninety-nine articles were evaluated for inclusion, of which seven met all inclusion criteria. Across all studies, 1589 patients received cefazolin and 2802 received an ASP. All-cause 90 day mortality was lower in patients who received cefazolin (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.99; I2 = 58%). Odds of discontinuation due to adverse events was significantly lower in patients receiving cefazolin (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.11-0.56; I2 = 13%). No differences in clinical failure were observed (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.41-1.76; I2 = 74%). Conclusions: This meta-analysis identified a significant decrease in mortality associated with cefazolin therapy for MSSA bacteraemia compared with ASPs, though no differences in clinical failure were observed. Additionally, cefazolin appeared to be better tolerated. These results should be interpreted with caution given the uncontrolled and retrospective nature of the included studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30085140     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  11 in total

1.  Ability of Bicarbonate Supplementation To Sensitize Selected Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains to β-Lactam Antibiotics in an Ex Vivo Simulated Endocardial Vegetation Model.

Authors:  Arnold S Bayer; Selvi C Ersoy; Warren E Rose; Ana M Bienvenida; Yan Q Xiong; Henry F Chambers
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Constructing and deconstructing the bacterial cell wall.

Authors:  Jed F Fisher; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Population Pharmacokinetic Study of Cefazolin Dosage Adaptation in Bacteremia and Infective Endocarditis Based on a Nomogram.

Authors:  Ronan Bellouard; Colin Deschanvres; Guillaume Deslandes; Éric Dailly; Nathalie Asseray; Pascale Jolliet; David Boutoille; Benjamin Gaborit; Matthieu Grégoire
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Comparative Effectiveness of Exclusive Exposure to Nafcillin or Oxacillin, Cefazolin, Piperacillin/Tazobactam, and Fluoroquinolones Among a National Cohort of Veterans With Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection.

Authors:  Maya Beganovic; Jaclyn A Cusumano; Vrishali Lopes; Kerry L LaPlante; Aisling R Caffrey
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.835

5.  Cefazolin Versus Anti-Staphylococcal Penicillins for the Treatment of Patients with Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Infection: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.

Authors:  John M Allen; Lolade Bakare; Anthony M Casapao; Ken Klinker; Lindsey M Childs-Kean; Ariel F Pomputius
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2019-08-08

6.  Intravenous versus Oral Step-Down for the Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in a Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Sarah Grace Gunter; Mary Joyce B Wingler; David A Cretella; Jamie L Wagner; Katie E Barber; Kayla R Stover
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-15

7.  The Cost-effectiveness of Cefazolin Compared With Antistaphylococcal Penicillins for the Treatment of Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Authors:  Elina Eleftheria Pliakos; Panayiotis D Ziakas; Eleftherios Mylonakis
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 3.835

Review 8.  Emerging Treatment Options for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections and Bloodstream Infections Caused by Staphylococcus aureus: A Comprehensive Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Daniele Roberto Giacobbe; Silvia Dettori; Silvia Corcione; Antonio Vena; Chiara Sepulcri; Alberto Enrico Maraolo; Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa; Matteo Bassetti
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 9.  Efficacy and safety of cefazolin versus antistaphylococcal penicillins for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changcheng Shi; Yubo Xiao; Qi Zhang; Qingyu Li; Fei Wang; Jing Wu; Nengming Lin
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Clinical Outcomes of an Innovative Cefazolin Delivery Program for MSSA Infections in OPAT.

Authors:  Laura Herrera-Hidalgo; Rafael Luque-Márquez; Aristides de Alarcon; Ana Belén Guisado-Gil; Belen Gutierrez-Gutierrez; Maria Dolores Navarro-Amuedo; Julia Praena-Segovia; Juan Manuel Carmona-Caballero; Elena Fraile-Ramos; Alicia Gutierrez-Valencia; Luis Eduardo Lopez-Cortes; Maria Victoria Gil-Navarro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.