Joren R Ten Hove1, Jonathan M K Bogaerts1, Michiel T J Bak1, Miangela M Laclé2, Vincent Meij3, Lauranne A A P Derikx4, Frank Hoentjen4, Nofel Mahmmod5, Sebastiaan A van Tuyl6, Bas Oldenburg1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 2. Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 5. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands. 6. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Abstract
Background: Patients with refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) might require a subtotal colectomy with construction of an ileostomy. Due to the risk of nerve damage and pelvic sepsis, the diverted rectum is often left in situ. Evidence on long-term complications of this rectal stump is limited, particularly in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). In addition to the risk of development of neoplasia, diversion proctitis is a frequently reported rectal stump associated complication. Surprisingly, clear recommendations concerning rectal stump surveillance and timing of proctectomy are lacking. Methods: Through the use of a pathology database and a review of medical records, we established a cohort of IBD patients with a diverted rectum. Among these patients, long-term complications of the rectal stump were identified. Main endpoint was advanced neoplasia (carcinoma or high-grade dysplasia [HGD]) in the rectal stump. Risk factors for advanced neoplasia were identified using Cox regression modeling. In the second, prospective part of the study, a questionnaire was sent out to 165 patients with either a rectal stump in situ or who had undergone a proctectomy, in order to identify differences in patient-reported outcome measures associated with the excision of the rectal stump. Results: From 530 patients with IBD and a (temporal) diversion of the rectum, we included 250 patients in whom the rectal stump was left in situ for more than 12 months. The majority of patients was female (61%) and had Crohn's disease (67%). On follow-up (median 8 years), 8 carcinomas, 2 cases of high-grade dysplasia, and 7 cases of low-grade dysplasia were found with incidence rates of 3.9 and 8.5 per 1000 patient-years of follow-up for cancer and all neoplasia, respectively. The 8 cases of rectal stump cancer (RSC) were diagnosed after a median of 15 years after colectomy. A history of colorectal neoplasia was associated with advanced rectal stump neoplasia. Out of 191 patients with endoscopic follow-up, rectal stump inflammation occurred in 161 (88.5%) patients. Results of the questionnaire did not show a significant difference in quality of life between patients with and patients without a rectal stump, although the latter group reported significantly more sexual and urinary symptoms than patients with a rectal stump in situ. The majority of rectal stump patients reported rectal blood loss, but 65.5% of them were not or barely limited in daily life by their rectal stumprelated problems. Conclusion: Rectal stump cancer has a low incidence rate, with patients with a history of colonic neoplasia carrying the highest risk of developing this severe complication. We observed no significant differences in quality of life between rectal stump and postproctectomy patients, but proctectomy surgery is associated with sexual and urinary complications.
Background: Patients with refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) might require a subtotal colectomy with construction of an ileostomy. Due to the risk of nerve damage and pelvic sepsis, the diverted rectum is often left in situ. Evidence on long-term complications of this rectal stump is limited, particularly in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). In addition to the risk of development of neoplasia, diversion proctitis is a frequently reported rectal stump associated complication. Surprisingly, clear recommendations concerning rectal stump surveillance and timing of proctectomy are lacking. Methods: Through the use of a pathology database and a review of medical records, we established a cohort of IBDpatients with a diverted rectum. Among these patients, long-term complications of the rectal stump were identified. Main endpoint was advanced neoplasia (carcinoma or high-grade dysplasia [HGD]) in the rectal stump. Risk factors for advanced neoplasia were identified using Cox regression modeling. In the second, prospective part of the study, a questionnaire was sent out to 165 patients with either a rectal stump in situ or who had undergone a proctectomy, in order to identify differences in patient-reported outcome measures associated with the excision of the rectal stump. Results: From 530 patients with IBD and a (temporal) diversion of the rectum, we included 250 patients in whom the rectal stump was left in situ for more than 12 months. The majority of patients was female (61%) and had Crohn's disease (67%). On follow-up (median 8 years), 8 carcinomas, 2 cases of high-grade dysplasia, and 7 cases of low-grade dysplasia were found with incidence rates of 3.9 and 8.5 per 1000 patient-years of follow-up for cancer and all neoplasia, respectively. The 8 cases of rectal stump cancer (RSC) were diagnosed after a median of 15 years after colectomy. A history of colorectal neoplasia was associated with advanced rectal stump neoplasia. Out of 191 patients with endoscopic follow-up, rectal stump inflammation occurred in 161 (88.5%) patients. Results of the questionnaire did not show a significant difference in quality of life between patients with and patients without a rectal stump, although the latter group reported significantly more sexual and urinary symptoms than patients with a rectal stump in situ. The majority of rectal stump patients reported rectal blood loss, but 65.5% of them were not or barely limited in daily life by their rectal stumprelated problems. Conclusion:Rectal stump cancer has a low incidence rate, with patients with a history of colonic neoplasia carrying the highest risk of developing this severe complication. We observed no significant differences in quality of life between rectal stump and postproctectomy patients, but proctectomy surgery is associated with sexual and urinary complications.
Authors: G Pellino; D S Keller; G M Sampietro; I Angriman; M Carvello; V Celentano; F Colombo; F Di Candido; S Laureti; G Luglio; G Poggioli; M Rottoli; S Scaringi; G Sciaudone; G Sica; L Sofo; S Leone; S Danese; A Spinelli; G Delaini; F Selvaggi Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2020-03-14 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Lucy Burns; Michael E Kelly; Maria Whelan; James O'Riordan; Paul Neary; Dara O Kavanagh Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2022-01-17 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Jan P Frese; Jörn Gröne; Johannes C Lauscher; Martin E Kreis; Benjamin Weixler; Katharina Beyer; Claudia Seifarth Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Arianna Dal Buono; Michele Carvello; David B Sachar; Antonino Spinelli; Silvio Danese; Giulia Roda Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2021-11-29 Impact factor: 4.623