Literature DB >> 30084025

Predictive factors affecting the prognosis and late complications of 73 consecutive cases of esophageal atresia at 2 centers.

Ryuta Masuya1, Tatsuru Kaji1, Motoi Mukai1, Kazuhiko Nakame1, Takafumi Kawano1, Seiro Machigashira1, Waka Yamada1, Koji Yamada1, Shun Onishi1, Keisuke Yano1, Tomoe Moriguchi1, Koshiro Sugita1, Masato Kawano1, Hiroyuki Noguchi2, Masaya Suzuhigashi2, Mitsuru Muto2, Satoshi Ieiri3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: While the diagnosis and outcomes of esophageal atresia (EA) have improved, associated anomalies, the management of late complications and growth remain major issues. We analyzed factors that affected the prognosis, late complications and growth.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed EA patients treated at two centers from 1984 to 2016. Patient characteristics, complications (gastroesophageal reflux [GER], anastomotic stenosis, tracheomalacia, dysphagia) and growth were evaluated.
RESULTS: Seventy-three EA patients were treated (overall survival rate:80.8%). The mean birth weight was 2514 ± 509 g in the surviving group, and 2453 ± 567 g in the fatal group excluded chromosomal abnormality (p = 0.76). Cardiac and chromosomal anomalies significantly affected mortality. Postoperative GER and anastomotic stenosis each occurred in 39% of the patients. Only GER was significantly affected by the Gross classification. The standard deviation (SD) values of the EA patients' growth were all lower than in the normal population. The SD of body weight was significantly lower in patients with extremity anomalies.
CONCLUSIONS: Associated cardiac and chromosomal anomalies significantly affected the prognosis. GER and anastomotic stenosis were the most common late complications. The growth of the surviving cases was insufficient. These factors will help optimize the therapeutic strategies and postoperative management for EA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal atresia; GER; Growth; Late complication; Morbidity; Mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30084025     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-018-4326-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  22 in total

1.  Effects of esophageal shortening on the gastroesophageal barrier: an experimental study on the causes of reflux in esophageal atresia.

Authors:  S Montedonico; J A Diez-Pardo; A K Possögel; J A Tovar
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  Analysis of Prognostic Factors and Mortality in Children with Esophageal Atresia.

Authors:  Miroslav Vukadin; Djordje Savic; Aleksandar Malikovic; Danica Jovanovic; Maja Milickovic; Srdjan Bosnic; Aleksandar Vlahovic
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  [Tracheal instability in tracheo-esophageal abnormalities].

Authors:  E Slany; J Holzki; A M Holschneider; M Gharib; W Hügel; U Mennicken
Journal:  Z Kinderchir       Date:  1990-04

4.  Esophageal atresia: historical evolution of management and results in 371 patients.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Deurloo; Seine Ekkelkamp; Mak Schoorl; Hugo A Heij; Daniel C Aronson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  ESPGHAN-NASPGHAN Guidelines for the Evaluation and Treatment of Gastrointestinal and Nutritional Complications in Children With Esophageal Atresia-Tracheoesophageal Fistula.

Authors:  Usha Krishnan; Hayat Mousa; Luigi Dall'Oglio; Nusrat Homaira; Rachel Rosen; Christophe Faure; Frédéric Gottrand
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.839

6.  Insufficient Body Weight of Adults Born With Esophageal Atresia.

Authors:  Nancy Presse; Julie Taillefer; Stéphanie Maynard; Mickael Bouin
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 7.  Esophageal atresia: prognostic classification revisited.

Authors:  Tatsuya Okamoto; Shigeru Takamizawa; Hiroshi Arai; Yuko Bitoh; Makoto Nakao; Akiko Yokoi; Eiji Nishijima
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Esophageal atresia: five year experience with 148 cases.

Authors:  L Spitz; E Kiely; R J Brereton
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Oesophageal atresia: at-risk groups for the 1990s.

Authors:  L Spitz; E M Kiely; J A Morecroft; D P Drake
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Lack of distal esophageal contractions is a key determinant of gastroesophageal reflux disease after repair of esophageal atresia.

Authors:  Hisayoshi Kawahara; Akio Kubota; Toshimichi Hasegawa; Hiroomi Okuyama; Takehisa Ueno; Takashi Watanabe; Yuji Morishita; Ryuta Saka; Masahiro Fukuzawa
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.545

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Oesophageal atresia: The growth gap.

Authors:  Isabelle Traini; Jessica Menzies; Jennifer Hughes; Steven Thomas Leach; Usha Krishnan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Diagnostic Value of Prenatal Ultrasound Parameters and Esophageal Signs in Pouch and Lower Thoracic Segment in Fetuses with Esophageal Atresia.

Authors:  Wenjun Feng
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 2.238

3.  Esophageal Diameter as a Function of Weight in Neonates, Children and Adolescents: Reference Values for Dilatation of Esophageal Stenoses.

Authors:  Steffan Loff; Oliver Diez; Wei Ho; Thekla V Kalle; Svetlana Hetjens; Michael Boettcher
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.418

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.