Literature DB >> 30083782

Role of transanal irrigation in the treatment of anterior resection syndrome.

J Martellucci1, A Sturiale2, C Bergamini2, L Boni3, F Cianchi4, A Coratti5, A Valeri2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transanal irrigation(TAI) has been reported to be an inexpensive and effective treatment for low anterior resection syndrome(LARS). The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate the use of TAI in patients with significant LARS symptoms at a single medical center.
METHODS: Patients who had low anterior resection for rectal cancer between April 2015 and May 2016 at the Careggi University Hospital were assessed for LARS using the LARS and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument (MSKCC BFI) questionnaires 30-40 days after  surgery or ileostomy closure (if this was done). Quality of life was evaluated using a visual analog scale and the Short Form-36 Health Survey. All patients with LARS score of 30 or higher were included (early LARS) as were all patients with a LARS score of 30 or higher referred 6 months or longer after surgery performed elsewhere (chronic LARS) in the same study period. Study participants were trained to perform TAI using the Peristeen™ System for 6 months, followed by 3 months of enema therapy following a similar protocol.
RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled in the study. Six patients stopped the treatment. The 27 patients (19 early LARS and 8 chronic LARS) who completed the study had a significant decrease in the number of median daily bowel movements [baseline 7 (range 0-14); 6 months 1 (range 0-4); 9 months 4 (range 0-13)]. The median LARS Score fell from 35.1 (range 30-42) (baseline) to 12.2 (range 0-21) after 6 months (p < 0.0001) and then rose to 27 (range 5-39) after 3 months of enema therapy. There was no difference in LARS score decrease at 6 months between the patients with early and chronic LARS (22.5 and 23.9 respectively; p=0.7) and there were no predictors of score decrease. Four components of the SF-36 significantly improved during the TAI period. The MSKCC BFI score significantly improved in several domains. Twenty-three patients (85%) asked to continue the treatment with TAI after the study ended.
CONCLUSIONS: TAI appears to be an effective treatment for LARS and results in a marked improvement of continence and quality of life.  Patients may be assessed and treated for LARS early after surgery since the treatment benefit is similar to that observed in patients with LARS diagnosed  6 months or longer after surgery. The potential rehabilitative role of TAI for LARS is promising and should be further investigated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior resection; Anterior resection syndrome; Functional disorders; Low anterior resection syndrome; Rectal cancer; Transanal irrigation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30083782     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1829-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  36 in total

1.  Circadian rhythm of rectal motor complexes.

Authors:  J J Auwerda; D J Bac; W R Schouten
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Experimental study of faecal continence and colostomy irrigation.

Authors:  A O'Bichere; P Sibbons; C Doré; C Green; R K Phillips
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Periodic rectal motor activity: the intrinsic colonic gatekeeper?

Authors:  S S Rao; K Welcher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Sacral neurostimulation for low anterior resection syndrome after radical resection for rectal cancer: evaluation of treatment with the LARS score.

Authors:  M D'Hondt; F Nuytens; L Kinget; M Decaestecker; B Borgers; I Parmentier
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Rectal perforation following transanal irrigation.

Authors:  Sameer Memon; Ian P Bissett
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 1.872

6.  Clinical presentation and management of iatrogenic colon perforations.

Authors:  T M Gedebou; R A Wong; W D Rappaport; P Jaffe; D Kahsai; G C Hunter
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Long-term outcome and safety of transanal irrigation for constipation and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Peter Christensen; Klaus Krogh; Steen Buntzen; Fariborz Payandeh; Søren Laurberg
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 8.  Management of faecal incontinence and constipation in adults with central neurological diseases.

Authors:  Maureen Coggrave; Christine Norton; June D Cody
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-01-13

9.  Bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment: a study comparing the specialist's versus patient's perspective.

Authors:  Tina Yen-Ting Chen; Katrine Jøssing Emmertsen; Søren Laurberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  What Are the Best Questionnaires To Capture Anorectal Function After Surgery in Rectal Cancer?

Authors:  Tina Yen-Ting Chen; Katrine J Emmertsen; Søren Laurberg
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2015
View more
  7 in total

1.  Refractory major LARS: stoma can wait.

Authors:  Roberto Peltrini; Paola Antonella Greco; Luigi Bucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Use of a new transanal irrigation device for bowel disorder management by patients familiar with the irrigation technique: a prospective, interventional, multicenter pilot study.

Authors:  K Charvier; V Bonniaud; D Waz; C Desprez; A-M Leroi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Management guidelines for low anterior resection syndrome - the MANUEL project.

Authors:  Peter Christensen; Coen Im Baeten; Eloy Espín-Basany; Jacopo Martellucci; Karen P Nugent; Frank Zerbib; Gianluca Pellino; Harald Rosen
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Safety Between da Vinci Robotic and Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Xingshun Qi; Fangfang Yi; Rongrong Cao; Guangrong Gao; Cheng Zhang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-02

5.  Preliminary functional results after transanal irrigation in patients undergoing SHiP procedure for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Bianco; Sebastiano Grassia; Marta Goglia; Gaetano Gallo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-07-18

6.  Randomized clinical trial of prophylactic transanal irrigation versus supportive therapy to prevent symptoms of low anterior resection syndrome after rectal resection.

Authors:  H R Rosen; W Kneist; A Fürst; G Krämer; J Hebenstreit; J F Schiemer
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-03-18

7.  A study on the clinical application of greater omental pedicle flap transplantation to correct anterior resection syndrome in patients with low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Haiquan Qin; Linghou Meng; Zigao Huang; Jiankun Liao; Yan Feng; Shanshan Luo; Hao Lai; Weizhong Tang; Xianwei Mo
Journal:  Regen Ther       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.419

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.