| Literature DB >> 30082660 |
Anisha Mahendra Thanki1, Grace Taylor-Joyce2, Ahmed Dowah3, Janet Yakubu Nale4, Danish Malik5, Martha Rebecca Jane Clokie6.
Abstract
Bacteriophage (phage) therapy is a promising alternative to antibiotics for the treatment of bacterial pathogens, including Clostridiumdifficile. However, as for many species, in C. difficile the physical interactions between phages and bacterial cells have not been studied in detail. The initial interaction, known as phage adsorption, is initiated by the reversible attachment of phage tail fibers to bacterial cell surface receptors followed by an irreversible binding step. Therefore binding can dictate which strains are infected by the phage. In this study, we investigated the adsorption rates and irreversible binding of three C. difficile myoviruses: CDHM1, CDHM3 and CDHM6 to ten strains that represent ten prevalent C. difficile ribotypes, regardless of their ability to infect. CDHM1 and CDHM3 phage particles adsorbed by ~75% to some strains that they infected. The infection dynamics for CDHM6 are less clear and ~30% of the phage particles bound to all strains, irrespective of whether a successful infection was established. The data highlighted adsorption is phage-host specific. However, it was consistently observed that irreversible binding had to be above 80% for successful infection, which was also noted for another two C. difficile myoviruses. Furthermore, to understand if there is a relationship between infection, adsorption and phage tail fibers, the putative tail fiber protein sequences of CDHM1, CDHM3 and CDHM6 were compared. The putative tail fiber protein sequence of CDHM1 shares 45% homology at the amino acid level to CDHM3 and CDHM6, which are identical to each other. However, CDHM3 and CDHM6 display differences in adsorption, which highlights that there is no obvious relationship between putative tail fiber sequence and adsorption. The importance of adsorption and binding to successful infection is often overlooked, and this study provides useful insights into host-pathogen interactions within this phage-pathogen system.Entities:
Keywords: Clostridium difficile; phage adsorption; phage tail fibers; phage-host interactions
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30082660 PMCID: PMC6116197 DOI: 10.3390/v10080411
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Host range and efficiency of plating of C. difficile phages CDHM1, CDHM3 and CDHM6.
| Strain Identity | Infectivity of Phages 1 | Efficiency of Plating (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDHM1 | CDHM3 | CDHM6 | CDHM1 | CDHM3 | CDHM6 | ||
| 013 | ASH | − | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 014/020 | ATJ | ++ | ++ | ++ | 100 | 73 | 81 |
| 026 | ARU | + | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 027 | CD105LC1 | − | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 076 | CD105HE1 | ++ | ++ | ++ | 100 | 100 | 100 |
1 No infection is presented as −; hazy and turbid clearing by + and infection by ++.
Figure 1The adsorption of phages CDHM1 (a), CDHM3 (b) and CDHM6 (c) to ten representative isolates of clinically relevant C. difficile ribotypes and representative E. coli, P. aeruginosa and MRSA strains. A phage-only control in buffer alone was included. Bar graphs show phage adsorption after 30 min. Bars represent average percentage adsorption from three independent experiments, each with three technical repeats and error bars represent standard error of the mean.
Percentage of irreversibly bound phages calculated from the total number of phages bound to different clinically relevant C. difficile ribotypes.
| Ribotype | Strain Identity | Irreversible Binding (%) of | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDHM1 | CDHM3 | CDHM6 | ||
| 002 | AKC | 13 | 4 | 14 |
| 005 | AIN | 18 | 12 | 15 |
| 013 | ASH | 3 | 51 | 21 |
| 014/020 | ATJ | 90 | 93 | 90 |
| 026 | ARU | 59 | 2 | 58 |
| 027 | CD105LC1 | 7 | 52 | 5 |
| 076 | CD105HE1 | 95 | 88 | 97 |
| 078 | ASS | 16 | 9 | 7 |
| 087 | APT | 29 | 8 | 10 |
| 107 | ARZ | 9 | 12 | 7 |
1 Average irreversible phage binding was calculated from three independent experiments each with three technical repeats.
The percentage of phages CDHM2 and CDHM5 that adsorbed and irreversibly bound to different clinically relevant C. difficile ribotypes.
| Ribotype | Strain Identity | CDHM2 | CDHM5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adsorption (%) 1 | Irreversible Binding (%) 1 | Adsorption (%) 1 | Irreversible Binding (%) 1 | ||
| 002 | AKC | 22 | 29 | 33 | 29 |
| 005 | AIN | 11 | 6 | 10 | 12 |
| 013 | ASH | 3 | 11 | 13 | 9 |
| 014/020 | ATJ | 82 | 92 | 82 | 97 |
| 026 | ARU | 32 | 2 | 10 | 15 |
| 027 | CD105LC1 | 36 | 13 | 29 | 21 |
| 076 | CD105HE1 | 79 | 98 | 80 | 97 |
| 078 | ASS | 20 | 30 | 17 | 20 |
| 087 | APT | 17 | 8 | 10 | 30 |
| 107 | ARZ | 26 | 36 | 17 | 14 |
1 Average adsorption and irreversible phage binding percentages were calculated from three independent experiments each with three technical repeats.
Figure 2Alignment of putative tail fiber protein sequences of C. difficile phages CDHM1, CDHM3 and CDHM6. The alignment tool MUSCLE was used and gaps in the sequence are indicated with dashed lines and numbers above mark the amino acid number. The length of each sequence was 267, 368 and 368 amino acids for phages CDHM1, CDHM3 and CDHM6 respectively. The color of the amino acid represents its percentage identity to the consensus sequence, where the darker the color the higher the percentage identity.
Figure 3Evolutionary relationship of putative tail fiber proteins of C. difficile phages was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method. The bootstrap consensus tree was inferred from 500 replicates was taken to represent the evolutionary history of C. difficile phage putative tail fiber proteins and bootstrap values are shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale and the scale bar represents the relative genetic distances. The evolutionary distances were computed using the p-distance method. All positions that contained gaps and missing data were eliminated from the analysis. The analysis involved 18 protein sequences, which included 15 annotated C. difficile myovirus tail fiber proteins available on NCBI (listed in Supplementary Table S1) and myovirus CDHM1, CDHM3 and CDHM6 from the present study (highlighted in red). Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA7.