Literature DB >> 30082380

Five-S-isotope evidence of two distinct mass-independent sulfur isotope effects and implications for the modern and Archean atmospheres.

Mang Lin1, Xiaolin Zhang2, Menghan Li2, Yilun Xu2, Zhisheng Zhang3, Jun Tao3, Binbin Su4, Lanzhong Liu4, Yanan Shen5, Mark H Thiemens1.   

Abstract

The signature of mass-independent fractionation of quadruple sulfur stable isotopes (S-MIF) in Archean rocks, ice cores, and Martian meteorites provides a unique probe of the oxygen and sulfur cycles in the terrestrial and Martian paleoatmospheres. Its mechanistic origin, however, contains some uncertainties. Even for the modern atmosphere, the primary mechanism responsible for the S-MIF observed in nearly all tropospheric sulfates has not been identified. Here we present high-sensitivity measurements of a fifth sulfur isotope, stratospherically produced radiosulfur, along with all four stable sulfur isotopes in the same sulfate aerosols and a suite of chemical species to define sources and mechanisms on a field observational basis. The five-sulfur-isotope and multiple chemical species analysis approach provides strong evidence that S-MIF signatures in tropospheric sulfates are concomitantly affected by two distinct processes: an altitude-dependent positive 33S anomaly, likely linked to stratospheric SO2 photolysis, and a negative 36S anomaly mainly associated with combustion. Our quadruple stable sulfur isotopic measurements in varying coal samples (formed in the Carboniferous, Permian, and Triassic periods) and in SO2 emitted from combustion display normal 33S and 36S, indicating that the observed negative 36S anomalies originate from a previously unknown S-MIF mechanism during combustion (likely recombination reactions) instead of coal itself. The basic chemical physics of S-MIF in both photolytic and thermal reactions and their interplay, which were not explored together in the past, may be another ingredient for providing deeper understanding of the evolution of Earth's atmosphere and life's origin.
Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  combustion; cosmogenic sulfur-35; recombination reactions; stable sulfur isotope anomalies; sulfate aerosols

Year:  2018        PMID: 30082380      PMCID: PMC6112696          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1803420115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


As the tenth most abundant element in the universe, sulfur occurs as stable (32S, 33S, 34S, and 36S) and radioactive isotopes (e.g., 35S and 38S). The signature of mass-independent fractionation of quadruple sulfur stable isotopes [S-MIF or sulfur isotopic anomaly, quantified by Δ33S = δ33S − [(1 + δ34S)0.515 − 1] and Δ36S = δ36S − [(1 + δ34S)1.9 − 1] and traditionally expressed as per mil] observed in Archean (∼4 Ga to ∼2.5 Ga) sediments has been interpreted as a proxy of the origin and evolution of atmospheric oxygen and early life on Earth (1, 2). Resolving all mechanistic origins of S-MIF has been a focus of active research for more than 20 y (3). Photochemistry of sulfur-bearing gases (e.g., SO2 and H2S) in the short-wavelength UV region accounts for much of the Archean record and is the currently most accepted mechanism responsible for S-MIF observed on Earth (1, 2, 4), Mars (5), and possibly achondritic meteorites (6). In modern Earth, only stratospheric sulfates are presumed to acquire S-MIF signatures, because short (<∼290 nm) UV light is shielded by the stratospheric ozone layer. The presence of S-MIF in sulfates extracted from ice cores, snow pits, and ash beds is interpreted as deriving from massive volcanic eruptions with stratospheric SO2 injection (7–9). This assumption may not always be valid, because sulfur isotopic anomalies not explicable by mass-dependent fractionation (MDF) (10) are widely found in tropospheric sulfates (11–15) (Fig. 1). Stratospheric influence on the unexpected S-MIF in tropospheric sulfates, which has been speculated about for more than 15 y (11–16), remains unquantified for lack of a measurable stratospheric tracer of the sulfate. Recently, combustion processes were also speculated on as an additional potential source for S-MIF in tropospheric sulfates (15, 16), but unambiguous evidence is absent because (i) the direct relationship between combustion and S-MIF signature in ambient tropospheric aerosols is not demonstrated by combustion tracer measurements and (ii) multiple sulfur isotopic compositions in fuels for combustion have not been reported. Without a complete understanding of the origin of S-MIF in modern atmospheric sulfates, interpretation of S-MIF signals preserved in cryospheric, geological, and meteoritic samples possesses embedded uncertainties.
Fig. 1.

Quadruple stable sulfur isotopic compositions in modern tropospheric sulfates, SO2, and coal. Atmospheric samples were collected from a background site at East China (the Mount Wuyi Station; this study), the third largest megacity in China (Guangzhou; this study), coastal California (11), inland California (11), rural Beijing (12), urban Beijing (13), Seoul (14), and Tibetan Plateau (15). Note that Δ36S data for urban Beijing (13) and Seoul (14) are not available, and therefore Δ33S data are shown on the x axis as bars. Chromium-reducible sulfur in coal (this study) and primary sulfates emitted from a chamber combustion experiment (29) are also shown. Error bars stand for 1 SD.

Quadruple stable sulfur isotopic compositions in modern tropospheric sulfates, SO2, and coal. Atmospheric samples were collected from a background site at East China (the Mount Wuyi Station; this study), the third largest megacity in China (Guangzhou; this study), coastal California (11), inland California (11), rural Beijing (12), urban Beijing (13), Seoul (14), and Tibetan Plateau (15). Note that Δ36S data for urban Beijing (13) and Seoul (14) are not available, and therefore Δ33S data are shown on the x axis as bars. Chromium-reducible sulfur in coal (this study) and primary sulfates emitted from a chamber combustion experiment (29) are also shown. Error bars stand for 1 SD. In this study, the high-sensitivity measurement (17, 18) of a fifth sulfur isotope, 35S (half-life: ∼87 d), casts light on the exploration of the origin of S-MIF in atmospheric sulfates on a field observational basis. Cosmogenic 35S is the only radioactive sulfur isotope existing in nature with a half-life of ideal age to track atmospheric processes (17). It is exclusively produced in the higher atmosphere by the spallogenic bombardment of 40Ar by high-energy cosmic rays. The ability of 35S to serve as a sensitive and unambiguous tracer in identifying sulfate aerosols originating from the higher atmosphere was recently demonstrated (19) and has been utilized in understanding sulfate formation pathways at different altitudes (20). Here we report all five (four stable and one radioactive) sulfur isotopes’ and all three stable oxygen isotopes’ (16O, 17O, and 18O) composition in sulfate along with other inorganic and organic compounds in the same aerosols collected at a midlatitude remote mountain site located in East Asia ( and ) to trace the origins of S-MIF signatures.

Quadruple Sulfur Isotope Composition in Sulfate Aerosols, SO2, and Coal

All sulfate aerosols measured in this study possess nonzero Δ33S and Δ36S values (Fig. 1), consistent with previous measurements (11–15). Because coal burning accounts for ∼95% of sulfur emissions in China (21) and it has been speculated that sulfur isotopic anomalies of present-day aerosols might originate from coal (12), we first measured quadruple stable sulfur isotopes in various representative Chinese coal samples [formed in the Carboniferous, Permian, and Triassic periods, in which 90% of the total recoverable coal reserves across China were formed (22)] and ambient SO2 emitted from coal burning () to evaluate their contribution to nonzero Δ33S and Δ36S values in atmospheric sulfates. Our data indicate that sulfur isotopic compositions in coal and SO2 are essentially normal within error, and their patterns in the Δ33S vs. Δ36S scatter plot notably differ from tropospheric sulfates (Fig. 1). It is therefore highly unlikely that nonzero Δ33S and Δ36S values in tropospheric sulfates directly originate from coal itself. Slight differences in MDF exponents of varying SO2 oxidation processes could accommodate small variations of Δ33S in tropospheric SO2-derived sulfates (±0.1‰) (10) but cannot account for the relatively large nonzero Δ33S and Δ36S values in most atmospheric sulfates (including the data in this study) (−0.66‰ < Δ33S < 0.53‰; −1.6‰ < Δ36S < −0.1‰) (Fig. 1). In fact, the seasonal variation of Δ33S values observed in this study () does not match the model calculation that only considers MDF processes (10). Additionally, the statistically insignificant (P > 0.05) correlation between Δ33S, Δ36S, and Δ17O [= δ17O − 0.52 × δ18O, an isotopic fingerprinting quantifying the relative contribution of SO2 oxidation processes (3)] shown in this study () and by Romero and Thiemens (11) also supports our argument. Replicate analysis and interlaboratory comparisons for the same atmospheric samples in this work demonstrate that the observed nonzero Δ33S and Δ36S values are independently reproducible and in agreement (), and the isotopic differences between SO2 and sulfate therefore further confirm that the nonzero Δ33S and Δ36S values in tropospheric sulfates are attributed to photolytic oxidation in the stratosphere or unknown S-MIF processes in the troposphere which require identification.

Altitude-Dependent Δ33S in the Modern Atmosphere

We observe that Δ33S is correlated with 35S specific activity (35S-SA) (Fig. 2 and ). The relationship between 35S-SA and Δ33S is best described by a log-linear function in this study, likely reflecting that their vertical profiles in the atmosphere are not exactly the same because of the complex nature of sulfur chemistry and different production processes of 35S (19) and Δ33S (16) at high altitudes. The age difference of air mass originating from the same altitude (i.e., decayed 35S but the same Δ33S) may also lead to the complex relationship but would not affect our major finding (i.e., positive relationship between 35S and Δ33S) because the decay lifetime of 35S (∼126 d) is significantly longer than the sulfate lifetime in the troposphere (days to weeks). Before this study, radioactive and multiple stable sulfur isotopes in sulfate aerosols were only simultaneously measured by Romero and Thiemens (11) in two samples collected from White Mountain in California. The sample possessing a greater 35S-SA in their pilot study displays a heavier Δ33S (0.16‰) than the other (0.10‰), consistent with our higher-sensitivity 35S measurements (17, 18).
Fig. 2.

Scatter plots of S-MIF signatures versus stratospheric and combustion tracers. (A−C) Δ33S versus (A) 35S specific activity, (B) SOR, and (C) levoglucosan concentrations. (D−F) Δ36S versus (D) 35S specific activity, (E) SOR, and (F) levoglucosan concentrations. Error bars represent 1 SD. If the Pearson correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (), regression lines, equations, and coefficients of determination (R2) are shown in darker colors.

Scatter plots of S-MIF signatures versus stratospheric and combustion tracers. (A−C) Δ33S versus (A) 35S specific activity, (B) SOR, and (C) levoglucosan concentrations. (D−F) Δ36S versus (D) 35S specific activity, (E) SOR, and (F) levoglucosan concentrations. Error bars represent 1 SD. If the Pearson correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (), regression lines, equations, and coefficients of determination (R2) are shown in darker colors. An extremely low ratio of 35S in coarse to fine particles (0.04) supports the premise that sulfates collected in our remote mountain site were mainly affected by long-range horizontal and vertical transport (). The altitude-dependent variation of Δ33S revealed by enrichment of stratospherically sourced 35S indicates that sulfate aerosols originating from the higher atmosphere possess a greater Δ33S value than the boundary layer. Ion-induced binary nucleation of H2SO4 and H2O by galactic cosmic rays was recently identified as a previously ignored process of new particle formations in the free troposphere (23). This process was subsequently found to be mass-dependent in laboratory experiments (24), and therefore it could not explain the 35S33S relation observed in this study. We do not rule out the possibility that there is an unknown SO2 oxidation mechanism which mass-independently enriches 33S in sulfate products in the free troposphere, but, at present, there is no evidence for the existence of such a process. Consequently, we favor the explanation by which downward transport of stratospheric sulfates is the most plausible source of positive Δ33S values in tropospheric sulfates (11–15). Romero and Thiemens (11) first measured quadruple sulfur isotopes in tropospheric sulfate aerosols and noted that Δ33S in the stratosphere might be larger than traditionally thought. Our first-order estimation of Δ33S values in stratospheric sulfates at East Asia (>4‰) agrees with previous interpretations, although the value should not be viewed as a precise estimate since the relationship between 35S and Δ33S is nonlinear and complex (see for details). Given large positive Δ33S values in sulfate products (and negative Δ33S values in residual SO2) in SO2 photolytic oxidation (in the presence of O2) (25) and frequent downward transport of stratospheric air at midlatitudes (19), it is plausible, and cannot be ruled out, that Δ33S values (<2‰) of stratospheric sulfates deposited in polar regions (a terminus in poleward transport from the tropics) are much smaller than stratospheric sulfates entrained downward at midlatitudes (where most of atmospheric sulfate measurements were made) as a result of Rayleigh fractionation of Δ33S during poleward transport. This view is consistent with results from a 2D dynamical/chemical model (26), although a different mechanism was used in that model (SO3 photolysis, in which the SO2 acquires positive Δ33S values), leading to an opposite trend. If this is true, the negative Δ33S in sulfates deposited in the South Pole during volcanically quiescence times (16) (Fig. 3) may be explained. This hypothesis is also consistent with the decrease of Δ33S from positive to negative values found in cryospheric records during stratospheric volcano events (8), because more stratospheric SO2 and sulfates can be transported to the polar regions during stratospheric volcano eruption than during volcanically quiescence times. Additionally, given the high temporal sulfur isotopic heterogeneity (8), it is not impossible that magnitudes of stratospheric S-MIF signatures preserved in the polar regions, even for snow pit samples (time scale: months), were smaller than atmospheric samples (time scale: days).
Fig. 3.

Similarity of S-MIF signatures in modern atmospheric sulfates and geological records. (A) Sulfates from modern aerosols (including the data in this study), ice cores and snow pits, Archean sediments (barites), and volcanic ash. (B) Pyrites (FeS2) and sulfides from different eras in Archean. The red dotted line represents the Archean Reference Array (with slopes of −0.9 and −1.5). See for the full list of references used for this compilation.

Similarity of S-MIF signatures in modern atmospheric sulfates and geological records. (A) Sulfates from modern aerosols (including the data in this study), ice cores and snow pits, Archean sediments (barites), and volcanic ash. (B) Pyrites (FeS2) and sulfides from different eras in Archean. The red dotted line represents the Archean Reference Array (with slopes of −0.9 and −1.5). See for the full list of references used for this compilation. As argued above, the stratospheric origin of nonzero Δ33S values observed in most sulfate aerosols in East China and California (Fig. 1) may be therefore dynamically explained by a combination of (i) the Asian monsoon anticyclone that efficiently transports SO2 to the lower stratosphere (27), (ii) the sulfate-enriched Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (28), and (iii) frequent, active, and intense stratospheric intrusions at midlatitudes of the Northern Hemisphere (19). Our findings therefore highlight the need for further simultaneous measurements (especially by aircraft or balloon collections) and 3D modeling of all five isotopes of sulfur in the modern atmosphere at varying geographic locales to understand the temporal and spatial sulfur isotopic heterogeneity, chemical transformation of sulfur-bearing species during transport, and their implication for tropospheric sulfur budget in the modern atmosphere.

Combustion-Associated Δ36S in the Modern Atmosphere

The most striking feature in the new data is that, unlike Δ33S, Δ36S is not clearly correlated with 35S-SA (Fig. 2 and ). The poor correlation (r = −0.18, P = 0.55) indicates that an additional process, apart from SO2 photochemistry (4), is required to fully explain S-MIF seen in atmospheric sulfates. The sulfur oxidation ratio (SOR) is conventionally expressed as the molar ratio of sulfate to total sulfur (sulfate and SO2) to quantify the degree of SO2 oxidation (i.e., formation of secondary sulfate). A low SOR therefore indicates less secondary sulfates (i.e., a relatively large fraction of primary sulfates) in total sulfates. The excellent correlation (r = 0.96, P < 0.000001) between SOR and Δ36S (Fig. 2) suggests that Δ36S is likely linked to the formation of primary sulfate during fossil fuel and/or biomass combustion, with the most negative Δ36S at low SOR. The y intercept (−1.7‰), representing Δ36S in sulfates near the emission source (characterized by a near-zero SOR as a result of large amounts of SO2), is close to the most negative Δ36S (−1.9‰) in primary sulfate aerosols emitted from biomass and diesel combustion (29) (Fig. 1). Alternatively, if the SOR equals 1, the Δ36S value in tropospheric secondary sulfate (0.1‰) is obtained, which matches SO2 observations (Fig. 1). This quantitative agreement therefore supports the hypothesis that the large 36S anomaly is associated with combustion processes rather than tropospheric SO2 oxidation. Another independent verifying observation is that there are significant correlations between Δ36S and various biomass burning tracers (levoglucosan, mannoson, and potassium) (30) in the same samples (Fig. 2 and ). Our five-sulfur-isotope observation points to a previously underappreciated nonphotochemical channel for producing S-MIF (i.e., fossil fuel and/or biomass combustion). Recent theoretical studies suggested that S-MIF can occur in recombination reactions of elemental sulfur [e.g., S + S2 + M → S3 + M, an analogy of O3 formation that produces oxygen MIF (3)] as a result of the symmetry effect (31, 32). Although the derived values should be quantitatively validated by laboratory experiments, the theoretical studies (31, 32) reemphasize the potential role of the symmetry effect in S-MIF, which has been noted since early studies (33) but was generally not considered in SO2 photolytic reactions, because of the trace amount of gaseous S2, S3, and S4 at ambient temperatures (34) and the difficulty of experimental investigation (31, 32). We argue that the elemental sulfur recombination reaction is strictly a thermal reaction, because elemental sulfur vapor (vapor pressure at 717.8 K: 1 atm) contains sulfur allotropes with two to eight sulfur atoms (35). In combustion processes, both S and S2 are important short-lived intermediates (36). There are a host of potentially relevant reactions (e.g., SH + S → S2 + H) (36) that may be crucial in producing these small sulfur allotropes in gas phase, and the high molecular number density may facilitate elemental sulfur recombination reactions. We noted that large S-MIF would be emitted as primary sulfates (Δ36S = −1.9‰) in smoldering combustion (Fig. 1) (29). Because of relatively low O2 levels in this slow and persistent (up to years) type of combustion rather than flaming fires (37, 38), the fast oxidation reactions (e.g., SH + O2SO + OH, SO + O2SO2 + O) (36) may be slightly restricted, and the above-discussed elemental sulfur related reactions may therefore become important. The potential role of such reactions in producing S-MIF signatures is highlighted and discussed by a recent study focusing on slightly negative Δ33S values observed in the 19th century, a period with extensive and persistent global biomass burning (15). Our observation provides an additional dimension (Δ36S) to verify the combustion-associated S-MIF signature and to delineate its chemical physics. Given the complexity of combustion processes, a clearly defined Δ33S−Δ36S relationship was not found in the early combustion experiment (29). The hypothesis proposed here and the corresponding Δ33S−Δ36S relationship could be tested experimentally in the future to detail all parameters and mechanisms. Significant correlations with SOR or biomass burning tracers are not observed with respect to Δ33S (Fig. 2 and ), indicating that Δ33S is less influenced by combustion processes than is Δ36S. Alternatively, the slightly negative Δ33S values of primary sulfates emitted from combustion processes (13, 15, 29) (Fig. 1) may be masked by the apparent stratospheric signal (notably positive Δ33S values) because our samples were collected in a midlatitude remote mountain site. Using the y intercepts of Δ33S/35S-SA and Δ36S/levoglucosan fitted curves in Fig. 2 (Δ33S = 0.13 ± 0.02‰, Δ36S = −0.23 ± 0.07‰, respectively), we estimate the Δ36S/Δ33S ratio of background tropospheric sulfates at East Asia to be −1.8 ± 0.6, a value matching tropospheric sulfates directly observed in a background station at the pristine Tibetan Plateau (−1.8 ± 0.9, n = 6) (15) and stratospheric sulfates estimated from Plinian volcanic eruption (−1.9 ± 0.6, n = 13) (8) and biomass burning (−1.9 ± 0.1, n = 3) (16) records in polar regions (). The consistency may imply the presence of a steady-state stratospheric component in the background troposphere of midlatitudes in the Northern Hemisphere as recently suggested by a decadal observation of stratospherically sourced Δ17O in tropospheric CO2 (39). On the basis of our new five-sulfur-isotope measurements, we identify an altitude-dependent process producing a gradual Δ36S/Δ33S slope and a combustion-related process producing a steep slope. The finding explains why inland California, a region more affected by the stratospheric air (19), possesses slightly higher Δ33S (0.20 ± 0.15‰, n = 22) and much smaller Δ36S (−0.4 ± 0.2‰, n = 22) values than the more polluted coastal California33S = 0.16 ± 0.14‰, Δ36S = −1.0 ± 0.4‰, n = 17) (11) (Fig. 1). These two MIF end-members, together with the MDF end-member [e.g., tropospheric secondary sulfates (10)], resolve a 15-y-old mystery: the “decoupled” relationship between Δ33S and Δ36S in atmospheric sulfates (11) (Fig. 1). The unique isotopic fingerprinting discovered in this study has the potential to quantify the contribution of previously underappreciated sources of sulfates to the present-day troposphere (e.g., stratospheric sulfate, biomass burning, and incomplete residential coal combustion) (13, 15, 16, 40, 41) and their subsequent influences on public health and climate.

Implications for the Understanding of the Archean S-MIF Record

The variability of Δ36S/Δ33S slopes in Archean sediments may be an indicator of a changing sulfur cycle on Earth during the appearance and evolution of early life (1, 2, 42), but fundamental chemistry reactions and corresponding biogeochemical processes remain elusive (42, 43). Because laboratory photolysis experiments showed that the Δ36S/Δ33S slope is sensitive to the wavelength (), experimental and modeling efforts have been focused on tuning atmospheric composition to reproduce the observed Archean array (44, 45). However, thermochemical sulfate reduction was proposed as an alternative or additional S-MIF mechanism to explain the Archean record (46), but this process was attributed to magnetic isotope effects (47), which only lead to 33S anomalies and contrast with observations in nature such as Archean rocks, ice cores, and present-day aerosols (Fig. 3). By comparison of sulfur isotopic signatures between modern and Archean record, recent studies suggest that varying atmospheric S-MIF processes (photolytic reactions of SO2/OCS, and possibly recombination reactions of elemental sulfur) may have operated in both periods (15, 16, 48). Our field-based observation has shown that, certainly for today, the isotopic anomalies in 33S and 36S appear decoupled in the measured natural samples, and their corresponding photochemical and nonphotochemical processes can be identified by simultaneous measurements of radiosulfur and combustion indices. The fitted Δ36S/Δ33S slope (−4.0 ± 1.0) in our selected aerosol samples (without samples strongly affected by combustion; see ) is compatible with the relatively steep Δ36S/Δ33S slope of −3.6 ± 1.8 observed in some Paleoarchean [3.6 Ga to 3.2 Ga, an era characterized by intense volcanic activity (49)] pyrites (50) (Fig. 3), indicating that photochemical and nonphotochemical S-MIF processes may have concomitantly occurred in primitive Earth. In the Archean, it is widely accepted that S-MIF signatures are from photochemical reactions of sulfur-bearing species emitted from volcanoes, and therefore volcanic activity is required in all Archean S-MIF models (1, 43). Venting and polymerization of gaseous S2 is ubiquitous on Io (one of Galilean moons), the most volcanically active body in the solar system (51). At terrestrial volcanic vents and fumaroles, elemental sulfur deposits formed in high-temperature sulfur-bearing gases are commonly found (35, 52). Therefore, it is likely that basic reactions responsible for nonphotochemical S-MIF processes in combustion [probably recombination reactions (31, 32)], which are characterized by large 36S anomalies, may occur in terrestrial volcanoes throughout Earth’s history. Existing data show a negative Δ36S value (−0.9‰) and a near-zero Δ33S value (0.03‰) in modern volcanogenic sulfate aerosols at the point of emission (53) (Fig. 3). This S-MIF signature, similar to combustion-associated Δ36S observed in this field-based study and previous chamber experiments (29), likely resulted from thermochemical S-MIF processes as suggested previously, as a photochemical source is not possible. Steep Δ36S/Δ33S slopes are also observed in sulfates leached from Quaternary volcanic ash (54), and in some igneous rocks from the Eoarchean (4.0 Ga to 3.6 Ga), an era during which Earth might be intensively impacted by asteroid storm (the Late Heavy Bombardment) (55) (Fig. 3). These similarities emphasize the need for further sulfur isotopic measurements of present-day volcanic gases and solids formed in the gas phase to understand sulfur isotope partitioning in these thermal reactions and its implications for early Earth evolution. Given that both SO2 photolysis and elemental sulfur polymerization are relevant to Archean volcanism, the Archean 33S and 36S anomalies could, in fact, come from the same volcanoes but different reactions, which lead to varying Δ36S/Δ33S slopes in the Archean record (Fig. 3). These two distinct S-MIF processes and their interplay are not concomitantly explored in the past. The present data suggest that, with extended experimental and modeling efforts on providing the new chemical physics of S-MIF in elemental sulfur recombination reactions, the Archean S-MIF record and its implications for the atmospheric, oceanic, and microbial processes on primitive Earth may potentially yield deeper insight in the future.

Materials and Methods

Aerosol, SO2, and coal samples were collected at a background mountain site in East Asia, a Chinese megacity (during the coal-burning season), and three coal mines across China, respectively (). Eight isotopes (32S, 33S, 34S, 35S, 36S, 16O, 17O, and 18O) in sulfate aerosols and quadruple stable sulfur isotopes (32S, 33S, 34S, and 36S) in SO2 and coal samples were measured. High-sensitivity radioactive sulfur isotope (cosmogenic 35S) measurements were conducted at University of California, San Diego using an ultra-low-level liquid scintillation spectrometer (Wallac 1220 Quantulus) technique (17, 18). Quadruple stable sulfur isotopes (32S, 33S, 34S, and 36S) were measured in two independent laboratories (University of California, San Diego and University of Science and Technology of China) using different fluorination methods and isotope ratio mass spectrometers (IRMS) (Thermo Finnigan MAT 253), and were reported in isotope ratios defined as δ3xS = (3xS/32S)sample/(3xS/32S)VCDT − 1, where x = 3, 4, and 6 and VCDT stands for the Vienna Canyon Diablo Troilite reference material. It is assumed that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) S1 has a sulfur isotopic composition on the VCDT scale of δ34S = −0.3‰, Δ33S = 0.10‰, and Δ36S = −0.80‰ (56). The IAEA S1 standard was routinely fluorinated and measured during the study period, and our values match the above-mentioned values and those obtained from another independent laboratory (University of Maryland) (57). Overall uncertainties (1 SD) of δ34S, Δ33S, and Δ36S in fluorination and isotopic measurements at both laboratories are less than 0.2‰, 0.01‰, and 0.2‰, respectively. Samples with sufficient sulfur and laboratory Ag2S standards were replicated for full chemistry (reduction, fluorination, and isotopic measurements) in both laboratories for comparing the measured Δ33S and Δ36S values. Differences between two laboratories and replicated experiments are within the reported analytical uncertainties (). The high reproducibility of Δ33S and Δ36S for the same atmospheric sample in independent laboratories allows us to assure that the measured S-MIF signatures were not an experimental artifact resulting from any unknown S-MIF fractionation process due to the chemically complex matrix in the atmospheric samples. Triple stable oxygen isotopes (16O, 17O, and 18O) were measured at University of California, San Diego using a pyrolysis method (58) and an IRMS. Assuming the molar ratio of sulfate to sodium (a sea salt tracer) to be 0.0604 in sea salt spray, we estimated the sea salt content in each fine sulfate sample to be less than 1.5% (with an average of 0.9 ± 0.3%) (20). Therefore, all isotopic compositions reported in this study are not corrected for non−sea-salt sulfates. Concentrations of water-soluble ions (Na+, NH4+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl−, NO3−, and SO42−), saccharidic tracers for biomass burning (levoglucosan and mannosan), and carbonaceous species in the same aerosol samples were determined using two ion chromatographies (Dionex ICS-1600 and ICS-2100), a high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (Dionex ICS-3000) technique (30), and a Desert Research Institute aerosol carbon analyzer (model 2001; Atmoslytic Inc.) (59), respectively. Detailed sampling and analytical procedures can be found in . All sulfur isotope data and relevant stratospheric/combustion tracer data reported in this study are presented in .
  31 in total

1.  Evidence of magnetic isotope effects during thermochemical sulfate reduction.

Authors:  Harry Oduro; Brian Harms; Herman O Sintim; Alan J Kaufman; George Cody; James Farquhar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mass-independent sulfur isotopic compositions in stratospheric volcanic eruptions.

Authors:  Mélanie Baroni; Mark H Thiemens; Robert J Delmas; Joël Savarino
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  High-precision measurements of (33)S and (34)S fractionation during SO2 oxidation reveal causes of seasonality in SO2 and sulfate isotopic composition.

Authors:  Eliza Harris; Bärbel Sinha; Peter Hoppe; Shuhei Ono
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Isotopic evidence for Mesoarchaean anoxia and changing atmospheric sulphur chemistry.

Authors:  James Farquhar; Marc Peters; David T Johnston; Harald Strauss; Andrew Masterson; Uwe Wiechert; Alan J Kaufman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Elemental sulfur aerosol-forming mechanism.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Joseph S Francisco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Accurate Quantification of Radiosulfur in Chemically Complex Atmospheric Samples.

Authors:  Mang Lin; Mark H Thiemens
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Sulfur dioxide emissions from combustion in china: from 1990 to 2007.

Authors:  Shenshen Su; Bengang Li; Siyu Cui; Shu Tao
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Multiple Sulfur Isotope Constraints on Sources and Formation Processes of Sulfate in Beijing PM2.5 Aerosol.

Authors:  Xiaokun Han; Qingjun Guo; Harald Strauss; Congqiang Liu; Jian Hu; Zhaobing Guo; Rongfei Wei; Marc Peters; Liyan Tian; Jing Kong
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Geological sulfur isotopes indicate elevated OCS in the Archean atmosphere, solving faint young sun paradox.

Authors:  Yuichiro Ueno; Matthew S Johnson; Sebastian O Danielache; Carsten Eskebjerg; Antra Pandey; Naohiro Yoshida
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Anomalous fractionations of sulfur isotopes during thermochemical sulfate reduction.

Authors:  Yumiko Watanabe; James Farquhar; Hiroshi Ohmoto
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sulfur isotope analysis for representative regional background atmospheric aerosols collected at Mt. Lulin, Taiwan.

Authors:  Chuan-Hsiung Chung; Chen-Feng You; Shih-Chieh Hsu; Mao-Chang Liang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Bulk and grain-scale minor sulfur isotope data reveal complexities in the dynamics of Earth's oxygenation.

Authors:  Gareth Izon; Genming Luo; Benjamin T Uveges; Nicolas Beukes; Kouki Kitajima; Shuhei Ono; John W Valley; Xingyu Ma; Roger E Summons
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 12.779

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.