| Literature DB >> 30081913 |
Rebecca Pawliw1, Rebecca Farrow1, Silvana Sekuloski1, Helen Jennings1, Julie Healer2, Thuan Phuong1, Pri Sathe2, Cielo Pasay1, Krystal Evans2, Alan F Cowman2, Louis Schofield2,3, Nanhua Chen4, James McCarthy1,5, Katharine Trenholme6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the use of induced blood stage malaria infection has proven to be a valuable tool for testing the efficacy of vaccines and drugs against Plasmodium falciparum, a limiting factor has been the availability of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-compliant defined P. falciparum strains for in vivo use. The aim of this study was to develop a cost-effective method for the large-scale production of P. falciparum cell banks suitable for use in clinical trials.Entities:
Keywords: Bioreactor; Good Manufacturing Practice; In vitro cultivation; Malaria; Plasmodium falciparum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30081913 PMCID: PMC6080485 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2435-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Process overview. The steps involved in production of the 3D7 KAHRP-KO GAP master cell bank
Fig. 2Wave bioreactor configuration. a Each cellbag has built-in inlet and outlet air filters, and ports that allow the addition of culture medium and extraction of samples. b The Ready to Process WAVE 25™ system (GE Healthcare) was used for this study. c Temperature, rocking speed, rocking angle and atmospheric conditions are monitored and controlled by the cellbag control unit (CBCU)
Specifications for the GAP MCB
| Assay | Specifications (acceptance criteria) | Test methods | Performed by |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red cell pellet | > 50 μL of RBC pellet is required after thawing the 3D7 KAHRP-KO GAP MCB and centrifuging the RBC suspension | Measured using a calibrated pipette | QIMR-B |
| Identification | Absence of | QIMR-B | |
| Percent parasitaemia | > 3% parasitized RBC | Malaria thin film smears | QIMR-B |
| Percent viable (active cell frequency) parasites | ≥ 25% viable | Limiting dilution assay | QIMR-B |
| Sterility | No growth | Microbial Contamination and Sterility Testing (SOP QC-11) | Q-Gen |
| Endotoxin Testing | < 5 EU/mL | Lonza’s Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) PYROGENT™ Ultra Assay | Q-Gen |
| Mycoplasma | No mycoplasma detected | Test for the detection of mycoplasma including qualification of the test article in accordance with European pharmacopeia, section 2.6.7 mycoplasmas | BioReliance |
| Spiroplasma culture | Not detected | Test for the detection of agar cultivable Spiroplasma including qualification of test article in accordance with US Pharmacopeia < 63 > mycoplasma/spiroplasma testing | BioReliance |
| HIV 1 and 2 | Not detected | Real time PCR assay for the detection of HIV I and HIV II in biological samples | BioReliance |
| HTLV I and II | Not detected | Pinnacle Q-PCR™ assay for the detection of HTLV | BioReliance |
| EBV | Not detected | Pinnacle Q-PCR™ assay for the detection of PCR for viral genome | BioReliance |
| CMV | Not detected | Pinnacle Q-PCR™ assay for the detection of PCR for viral genome | BioReliance |
| Hepatitis C Virus | Not detected | Pinnacle Q-PCR™ assay for the detection of PCR for viral genome | BioReliance |
| Hepatitis B Virus | Not detected | Pinnacle Q-PCR™ assay for the detection of PCR for viral genome | BioReliance |
| Human Parvovirus (B19) | Not detected | Pinnacle Q-PCR™ assay for the detection of PCR for viral genome | BioReliance |
| West Nile virus (WNV) | Not detected | Real time PCR for the detection of WNV in biological samples | BioReliance |
| Adeno-associated virus (AAV) | Not detected | Pinnacle Q-PCR™ assay for multiple serotypes of adeno-associated viruses (AAV) pathogen detection | BioReliance |
| Human Herpes virus type 7 | Not detected | Pinnacle Q-PCR™ assay for the detection of PCR for viral genome | BioReliance |
| Human Herpes virus type 6 | Not detected | Pinnacle Q-PCR™ assay for the detection of PCR for viral genome | BioReliance |
| Retroviruses | Report Result | Evaluation of reverse transcriptase activity by ultracentrifugation and quantitative fluorescent product enhanced reverse transcriptase (QPERT) assay | BioReliance |
| Quantitative transmission electron microscopy of sections for the detection of viruses, fungi, yeasts, bacteria and mycoplasmas (200 cell profiles) | No extraneous agents observed in the 200 cell profiles examined | Quantitative transmission electron microscopy of sections for detection of viruses, fungi, yeasts, bacteria and mycoplasmas (200 cell profiles) | BioReliance |
| Presence of viral contaminants | Not detected | In vitro assay for the detection of viral contaminants using 3 detector cell lines | BioReliance |
| Presence of inapparent viruses | Not detected | Test for the presence of inapparent viruses using suckling mice, adult mice, guinea pigs and embryonated eggs in accordance with FDA CBER guidance | BioReliance |
PCR primers used for this study
| Oligo name | Sequence | |
|---|---|---|
| Primers used for Genotyping of the GAP MCB | ||
| mo517 | GGAACTCATTAATATGTATG | |
| mo518 | CAAAACCCATACTAAAAAAG | |
| mo519 | GAGAACTTTAGCACAAAAGC | |
| mo520 | TTTACGCTTTCTGCATCTTC | |
| Aw171 | CCTAATCATGTAAATCTTAAATTTTTC | |
| Aw560 | CCAATAGAT AAAATTTGTAG | |
Fig. 3qRT-PCR primers mapped on KAHRP gene. To validate the successful genetic attenuation of P. falciparum 3D7 and verify hDHFR integration, a real time PCR assay was set up using primers designed at various regions of the P. falciparum 3D7 GAP
Fig. 4Profile of parasitaemia and parasite life cycle stages during growth in biowave reactor system. Parasites maintained an asexual blood stage cycle of approximately 39 h during the in vitro culture period, and showed a normal maturation pattern. The percent parasitaemia and percent ring stage parasites of the culture over time were determined by microscopy
Fig. 5Giemsa-stained smear showing GAP MCB parasites at time of cryopreservation. At harvest the culture contained a high percentage of ring stage parasites
Fig. 6Agarose gel showing the genetic identity of the GAP MCB at Days 0 and 16. PCR assays confirmed kahrp gene deletion and hDHFR integration in parasite samples collected at the initiation of culture (Day 0) and at harvest (Day 16)
In-vitro drug sensitivity profile of the GAP MCB parasites
| Drug | Control | Sample | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3D7 | W2 | GAP MCB | |
| Chloroquine | S | R | S |
| Dihydroartemisinina | S | S | S |
| Piperaquine | S | S | S |
| Lumefantrine | S | S | S |
| Amodiaquine | S | S | S |
| Atovaquonea | S | S | S |
| Pyronaridinea | S | S | S |
| Mefloquine | R | S | R |
| Quinine | S | R | S |
S drug sensitive, R drug resistant
aInsufficient in vivo data to validate in vitro results; no established threshold values
Drug threshold values for GAP MCB parasites
| Anti-malarial drug | Test 1 | Test 2 | Test 3 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Test sample | Control | Test sample | Control | Test sample | ||||
| 3D7 | W2 | GAP MCB | 3D7 | W2 | GAP MCB | 3D7 | W2 | GAP MCB | |
|
| |||||||||
| IC50 (nM) | 14.85 | 206.8 | 14.37 | 16.53 | 297.6 | 13.77 | |||
| 95% confidence intervals (nM) | (8.489–25.98) | (131.6–325.0) | (8.671–23.80) | (9.880–27.64) | (179.3–493.9) | (8.149–23.28) | |||
|
| |||||||||
| IC50 (nM) | 5.624 | 4.354 | 4.931 | 7.366 | 2.019 | 7.943 | |||
| 95% confidence intervals (nM) | (4.271–7.406) | (2.902–6.532) | (3.667–6.629) | (5.600–9.689) | (1.539–2.649) | (6.065–10.40) | |||
|
| |||||||||
| IC50 (nM) | 18.15 | 46.02 | 15.27 | 30.69 | 48.85 | 23.59 | |||
| 95% confidence intervals (nM) | (10.41–31.66) | (29.78–71.11) | (8.490–27.47) | (19.33–48.72) | (34.94–68.31) | (15.29–36.39) | |||
|
| |||||||||
| IC50 (nM) | No results | 70.35 | No results | No results | 42.32 | No results | 315.2 | 25.31 | 335.8 |
| 95% confidence intervals (nM) | (46.35–106.8) | (33.26–53.85) | (205.2–484.3) | (18.11–35.38) | (251.3–448.7) | ||||
|
| |||||||||
| IC50 (nM) | 10.19 | 66.83 | 10.35 | 18.46 | 83.88 | 15.55 | |||
| 95% confidence intervals (nM) | (6.031–17.21) | (40.88–109.3) | (5.551–19.31) | (10.06–33.86) | (48.10–146.3) | (9.139–26.47) | |||
|
| |||||||||
| IC50 (nM) | 0.9587 | 1.939 | 1.147 | 0.7122 | 1.524 | 1.216 | |||
| 95% confidence intervals (nM) | (0.8493–1.082) | (1.752–2.147) | (0.9806–1.342) | (0.6224–0.8150) | (1.304–1.781) | (1.094–1.352) | |||
|
| |||||||||
| IC50 (nM) | 5.398 | 9.897 | 7.804 | 27.67 | 21.88 | 12.59 | |||
| 95% confidence intervals (nM) | (3.359–8.675) | (5.615–17.45) | (3.473–17.54) | (15.88–48.19) | (11.82–40.49) | (6.720–23.57) | |||
|
| |||||||||
| IC50 (nM) | 101.5 | 15.32 | 98.87 | 157 | 12.26 | 61.27 | |||
| 95% confidence intervals (nM) | (72.61–141.8) | (10.85–21.65) | (69.17–141.3) | (79.04–311.8) | (8.573–17.53) | (43.67–85.96) | |||
|
| |||||||||
| IC50 (nM) | 203.2 | 795.6 | 227.4 | 335.6 | 569.6 | 89.73 | |||
| 95% confidence intervals (nM) | (169.9–243.0) | (527.6–1200) | (173.1–298.8) | (195.2–577.1) | (432.1–750.9) | (62.87–128.1) | |||
Drug threshold values are expressed as mean IC50 (95% confidence interval) in nmol/L
The assay was repeated twice and reproducible results were obtained
A third assay was performed for lumefantrine as IC50 values were not detectable in the first two assays