Christian Fischer 1 , Tabea Haug 1 , Marc-Andre Weber 2,3 , Hans-Ulrich Kauczor 2 , Thomas Bruckner 4 , Gerhard Schmidmaier 1 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the value of CEUS in the evaluation of tibial fracture perfusion and its ability to differentiate between physiologic and abnormal fracture healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2014 to 2017, 107 patients with tibial fractures or tibial non-unions underwent CEUS examination. CEUS was performed at the regular follow-up examination 26 weeks after osteosynthesis or before non-union surgery. Time-intensity curves (TICs) of the contrast enhancement in the fracture gap were generated, and volume parameters such as wash-in rate (WiR), peak enhancement (PE) and wash-in perfusion index (WiPI) were quantified. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients met the inclusion criteria of this study, including 14 consolidated fractures, 12 aseptic non-unions and 8 infected non-unions. WiR, PE and WiPI showed significantly lower values in aseptic non-unions compared to unions (p = 0.009, 0.009, 0.012, resp.). In contrast, infected non-unions showed higher values of WiR, PE and WiPI when compared to unions (p = 0.034, 0.056, 0.029, resp.). CONCLUSION: CEUS represents a feasible method in the assessment of tibial fracture perfusion. Perfusion differences between aseptic and infected tibial non-unions as well as healing tibial fractures could be detected. The deviation of physiologic fracture perfusion seems to be associated with disturbed osseous regeneration leading to non-union. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
PURPOSE: To assess the value of CEUS in the evaluation of tibial fracture perfusion and its ability to differentiate between physiologic and abnormal fracture healing . MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2014 to 2017, 107 patients with tibial fractures or tibial non-unions underwent CEUS examination. CEUS was performed at the regular follow-up examination 26 weeks after osteosynthesis or before non-union surgery. Time-intensity curves (TICs ) of the contrast enhancement in the fracture gap were generated, and volume parameters such as wash-in rate (WiR), peak enhancement (PE) and wash-in perfusion index (WiPI) were quantified. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients met the inclusion criteria of this study, including 14 consolidated fractures , 12 aseptic non-unions and 8 infected non-unions. WiR, PE and WiPI showed significantly lower values in aseptic non-unions compared to unions (p = 0.009, 0.009, 0.012, resp.). In contrast, infected non-unions showed higher values of WiR, PE and WiPI when compared to unions (p = 0.034, 0.056, 0.029, resp.). CONCLUSION: CEUS represents a feasible method in the assessment of tibial fracture perfusion. Perfusion differences between aseptic and infected tibial non-unions as well as healing tibial fractures could be detected. The deviation of physiologic fracture perfusion seems to be associated with disturbed osseous regeneration leading to non-union. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Entities: Disease
Species
Mesh: See more »
Substances: See more »
Year: 2018
PMID: 30081395 DOI: 10.1055/a-0637-1679
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ultraschall Med ISSN: 0172-4614 Impact factor: 6.548