Literature DB >> 30081017

Do Largest Basal Tumor Diameter and the American Joint Committee on Cancer's Cancer Staging Influence Prognostication by Gene Expression Profiling in Choroidal Melanoma.

Hakan Demirci1, Leslie M Niziol2, Zeynep Ozkurt2, Naziha Slimani2, Cem Ozgonul2, Tiffany Liu3, David C Musch4, Miguel Materin3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostication of choroidal melanoma (CM) by the gene expression profiling (GEP) test.
DESIGN: Cohort study.
METHODS: Retrospective review of 293 CM patients from 2 centers.
RESULTS: Of 293 patients, 132 (45%) were class 1A by GEP, 63 (22%) were class 1B, and 98 (33%) were class 2. Class 2 tumors had more ciliary body involvement and greater largest basal dimension (LBD), and were thicker. GEP results and increasing LBD were independently predictive of time to metastasis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated the probability of 3-year metastasis-free survival (MFS) of 0.99 in class 1A, 0.90 in class 1B, and 0.60 in class 2. The probability of 3-year MFS was 0.49 in class 2 patients with LBD ≥ 12 mm vs 1.00 in those with LBD < 12 mm, 0.89 in class 1B with LBD ≥ 12 mm vs 0.93 in those with LBD < 12 mm, and 0.99 in class 1A with LBD ≥ 12 mm vs 1.00 in those with LBD < 12 mm. In American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I CMs, the probability of 3-year MFS was 1.0 for class 1A and 1B, and 0.79 for class 2. In stage II CMs, the probability of 3-year MFS was 0.99 for class 1A, 0.89 for class 1B, and 0.61 for class 2. In stage III CM, the probability of 3-year MFS was 1.0 for class 1A, 0.60 for class 1B, and 0.41 for class 2.
CONCLUSIONS: GEP testing provided significant prognostic information for CM. Class 2 tumors with LBD ≥ 12 mm and class 2 and 1B tumors with AJCC stage III showed significantly worse prognosis.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30081017     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.07.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  5 in total

1.  Gene Expression Profiling in Uveal Melanoma: Five-Year Prospective Outcomes and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Thomas M Aaberg; Kyle R Covington; Tony Tsai; Yevgeniy Shildkrot; Kristen M Plasseraud; Katherina M Alsina; Kristen M Oelschlager; Federico A Monzon
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2020-07-06

2.  Improved Prognostic Precision in Uveal Melanoma through a Combined Score of Clinical Stage and Molecular Prognostication.

Authors:  Andrew W Stacey; Vaidehi S Dedania; Miguel Materin; Hakan Demirci
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2021-11-01

3.  Integrative analysis identifies key genes related to metastasis and a robust gene-based prognostic signature in uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Shizhen Lei; Yi Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.063

4.  Preliminary Results of Uveal Melanoma Treated With Iodine-125 Plaques: Analysis of Disease Control and Visual Outcomes With 63 Gy to the Target Volume.

Authors:  Wajiha J Kheir; Sandra S Stinnett; Sheridan Meltsner; Ekaterina Semenova; Yvonne M Mowery; Oana Craciunescu; David G Kirsch; Miguel A Materin
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-01-14

5.  Uveal melanoma patient attitudes towards prognostic testing using gene expression profiling.

Authors:  Basil K Williams; Jennifer J Siegel; Katherina M Alsina; Lauren Johnston; Amanda Sisco; Kyleigh LiPira; Sara M Selig; Peter G Hovland
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2022-09-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.