| Literature DB >> 30079333 |
Xiaoyue Xu1,2, Deborah Parker1, Zumin Shi3,4, Julie Byles2, John Hall5, Louise Hickman1.
Abstract
Background: There is a paucity of studies that have explored the association between dietary pattern and cognitive function, and whether there is an interaction between dietary pattern and hypertension in relation to older people's cognitive functioning.Entities:
Keywords: cognitive functioning; dietary pattern; hypertension; longitudinal data analysis; older people
Year: 2018 PMID: 30079333 PMCID: PMC6062638 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00201
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1The number of participants in the analysis.
Characteristics of study participants in 1997, 2000, 2004, and 2006 (N = 4,847 with 10,658 observations).
| Median (IQR) | 64 (59; 70) | 64 (59; 71) | 64 (59; 71) | 64 (59; 71) | <0.001 |
| Mean (SD) | 88 (97) | 77 (98) | 76 (95) | 73 (96) | <0.001 |
| Men | 1,006 (47.3%) | 1,064 (47.8%) | 1,418 (47.8%) | 1,588 (47.5%) | 0.93 |
| Women | 1,123 (52.8%) | 1,160 (52.2%) | 1,546 (52.2%) | 1,753 (52.5%) | |
| Married | 1,530 (72.6%) | 1,588 (74.7%) | 2,286 (77.6%) | 2,621 (78.6%) | <0.001 |
| Other marital status | 577 (27.4%) | 538 (25.3%) | 660 (22.4%) | 741 (21.4%) | |
| Low | 946 (49.6%) | 781 (40.2%) | 798 (27.0%) | 1,017 (30.6%) | <0.001 |
| Medium | 621 (32.6%) | 730 (37.7%) | 1,295 (43.9%) | 1,276 (38.4%) | |
| High | 340 (17.8%) | 426 (22.0%) | 859 (29.1%) | 1,034 (31.1%) | |
| Yes | 833 (39.3%) | 826 (37.5%) | 952 (32.2%) | 1,046 (31.3%) | <0.001 |
| No | 1,286 (60.7%) | 1,378 (62.5%) | 2,005 (67.8%) | 2,295 (68.7%) | |
| Low | 782 (36.3%) | 717 (32.2%) | 955 (32.2%) | 996 (29.8%) | <0.001 |
| Medium | 957 (45.0%) | 797 (35.8%) | 811 (27.4%) | 998 (29.9%) | |
| High | 390 (18.3%) | 710 (31.9%) | 1,198 (40.4%) | 1,347 (40.3%) | |
| Yes | 574 (27.0%) | 599 (26.9%) | 779 (26.3%) | 819 (24.5%) | <0.001 |
| No | 1,555 (73.0%) | 1,625 (73.1%) | 2,185 (73.7%) | 2,522 (75.5%) | |
| Yes | 641 (30.6%) | 694 (31.9%) | 863 (29.2%) | 938 (28.1%) | <0.001 |
| No | 1,456 (69.4%) | 1,484 (68.1%) | 2,097 (70.8%) | 2,403 (71.9%) | |
| Underweight | 249 (13.1%) | 203 (9.4%) | 244 (8.8%) | 244 (7.8%) | <0.001 |
| Normal | 1,062 (56.0%) | 1,214 (56.0%) | 1,465 (52.5%) | 1,656 (52.9%) | |
| Overweight | 423 (22.3%) | 563 (26.0%) | 797 (28.6%) | 934 (29.8%) | |
| Obese | 164 (8.6%) | 189 (8.7%) | 284 (10.1%) | 299 (9.5%) | |
| No | 1,081 (56.6%) | 1,294 (59.3%) | 1,705 (60.2%) | 2,046 (64.2%) | <0.001 |
| Yes | 829 (43.4%) | 887 (40.7%) | 1,129 (39.8%) | 1,139 (35.8%) | |
| Median (IQR) | 12 (7; 17) | 13 (7; 18) | 13 (8; 18) | 12 (7; 17) | <0.001 |
| Median (IQR) | 9 (6; 12) | 9 (6; 12) | 9 (6; 12) | 8 (5; 11) | <0.001 |
Generalized Estimating Equation was used to examine the association between survey year and gender, marital status, work status, smoking status, alcohol drinking and hypertension. Mixed linear regression as used to examine the association between survey year and age, physical activity, education levels, urbanization level, BMI, cognitive global scores and verbal memory scores.
Other marital status includes divorced, widowed, separated, and never married.
Factor loadings of three dietary patterns.
| Rice | 0.72 | −0.37 | |
| Fruit | 0.47 | ||
| Salted vegetables | 0.66 | ||
| Legume | 0.55 | ||
| Whole grain | −0.42 | 0.54 | |
| Tubers | 0.47 | ||
| Soy milk | 0.43 | ||
| Milk | 0.42 | ||
| Deep fired product | 0.40 | ||
| Eggs | 0.39 | ||
| Pork | 0.48 | ||
| Fish | 0.42 | ||
| Fast food | 0.39 | ||
| Cake | 0.31 | ||
| Dry tofu | 0.31 | ||
| Fungus | 0.26 | ||
| Shrimp | 0.25 | ||
| Beer | 0.23 | ||
| Poultry | 0.30 | 0.22 | |
| Nuts | 0.21 | ||
| Fresh vegetable | 0.26 | −0.21 | |
| Offal | 0.25 | ||
| Beef | 0.25 | ||
| Wheat | −0.70 | ||
Food intake across quartiles of three dietary patterns.
| Rice | 1.04 | 1.31 | 4.56 | 2.01 | 6.46 | 2.03 | 7.35 | 2.48 | <0.001 |
| Pork | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.22 | 0.77 | 1.73 | 0.96 | <0.001 |
| Fish | 0.10 | 0.23 | 0.28 | 0.42 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 1.10 | 0.89 | <0.001 |
| Dry tofu | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.39 | <0.001 |
| Poultry | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.25 | 0.18 | 0.29 | 0.48 | 0.60 | <0.001 |
| Fresh vegetables | 5.00 | 2.06 | 5.00 | 2.16 | 5.82 | 2.25 | 6.50 | 2.28 | <0.001 |
| Offal | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.28 | <0.001 |
| Beef | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.32 | <0.001 |
| Whole grain | 1.16 | 1.39 | 0.33 | 0.68 | 0.08 | 0.28 | 0.04 | 0.15 | <0.001 |
| Wheat | 7.23 | 3.30 | 2.59 | 1.65 | 1.23 | 1.01 | 0.90 | 0.82 | <0.001 |
| Fruit | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.60 | 1.22 | 1.72 | <0.001 |
| Soy milk | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.22 | 0.50 | 0.83 | <0.001 |
| Milk | 0.001 | 0.22 | 0.005 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.20 | 0.80 | 1.26 | <0.001 |
| Deep fried products | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.19 | 0.34 | 0.51 | <0.001 |
| Eggs | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.54 | 0.43 | 0.99 | 0.83 | <0.001 |
| Fast food | 0.003 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.44 | <0.001 |
| Cake | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.55 | <0.001 |
| Fungus | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.27 | <0.001 |
| Shrimp | 0.003 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.48 | <0.001 |
| Beer | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 1.30 | <0.001 |
| Poultry | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.15 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.44 | 0.31 | 0.55 | <0.001 |
| Nuts | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.25 | <0.001 |
| Fresh vegetables | 6.98 | 2.60 | 5.27 | 1.86 | 5.07 | 1.98 | 4.98 | 1.98 | <0.001 |
| Rice | 7.81 | 2.34 | 4.45 | 2.82 | 4.03 | 2.80 | 3.10 | 2.33 | <0.001 |
| Salted vegetables | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.49 | 0.62 | <0.001 |
| Legume | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.42 | 0.72 | <0.001 |
| Whole grain | 0.16 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 0.49 | 0.37 | 0.70 | 0.85 | 1.49 | <0.001 |
| Tubers | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 1.53 | 1.67 | <0.001 |
The association between dietary patterns and cognitive function.
| Crude model | 1 | 0.90 | 0.46; 1.33 | 0.34 | −0.10; 0.78 | 2.79 | 2.36; 3.23 | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.76 | 0.39; 1.13 | 0.39 | 0.01; 0.77 | 0.95 | 0.57; 1.33 | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 1.13 | 0.73; 1.53 | 0.93 | 0.51; 1.35 | 1.39 | 0.98; 1.80 | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 1.08 | 0.68; 1.47 | 0.81 | 0.39; 1.23 | 1.31 | 0.90; 1.72 | <0.001 |
| Model 4 | 1 | 1.10 | 0.70; 1.50 | 0.86 | 0.43; 1.28 | 1.32 | 0.90; 1.73 | <0.001 |
| Crude model | 1 | 0.85 | 0.43; 1.28 | 2.35 | 1.93; 2.78 | 4.05 | 3.63; 4.48 | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.86 | 0.49; 1.24 | 1.77 | 1.37; 2.16 | 2.47 | 2.02; 2.91 | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.79 | 0.40; 1.19 | 1.73 | 1.31; 2.15 | 2.41 | 1.93; 2.89 | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 0.73 | 0.33; 1.12 | 1.62 | 1.20; 2.04 | 2.27 | 1.79; 2.75 | <0.001 |
| Model 4 | 1 | 0.72 | 0.32; 1.12 | 1.66 | 1.24; 2.08 | 2.28 | 1.80; 2.76 | <0.001 |
| Crude model | 1 | −0.13 | −0.57; 0.31 | 0.32 | −0.12; 0.76 | 0.36 | −0.08; 0.80 | 0.16 |
| Model 1 | 1 | −0.27 | −0.63; 0.09 | −0.32 | −0.69; 0.04 | −0.45 | −0.83; −0.08 | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1 | −0.27 | −0.64; 0.10 | −0.21 | −0.58; 0.16 | −0.47 | −0.85; −0.09 | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1 | −0.24 | −0.61; 0.13 | −0.14 | −0.51; 0.23 | −0.34 | −0.73; 0.04 | <0.001 |
| Model 4 | 1 | −0.20 | −0.57; 0.18 | −0.12 | −0.50; 0.26 | −0.31 | −0.70; 0.08 | 0.001 |
| Crude model | 1 | 0.46 | 0.17; 0.76 | −0.21 | −0.51; 0.09 | 1.18 | 0.88; 1.47 | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.46; 1.03 | 0.32 | 0.02; 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.24; 0.83 | 0.78 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.76 | 0.47; 1.05 | 0.30 | -0.01; 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.24; 0.84 | 0.78 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 0.72 | 0.43; 1.01 | 0.18 | -0.13; 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.16; 0.76 | 0.84 |
| Model 4 | 1 | 0.73 | 0.44; 1.02 | 0.19 | -0.11; 0.50 | 0.44 | 0.14; 0.74 | 0.77 |
| Crude model | 1 | 0.52 | 0.23; 0.82 | 1.38 | 1.09; 1.67 | 2.33 | 2.04; 2.61 | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.53 | 0.25; 0.81 | 1.14 | 0.84; 1.43 | 1.56 | 1.23; 1.90 | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.45 | 0.16; 0.74 | 1.05 | 0.75; 1.36 | 1.47 | 1.12; 1.82 | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 0.39 | 0.10; 0.68 | 0.94 | 0.64; 1.25 | 1.33 | 0.98; 1.67 | <0.001 |
| Model 4 | 1 | 0.41 | 0.12; 0.70 | 0.99 | 0.69; 1.30 | 1.36 | 1.01; 1.71 | <0.001 |
| Crude model | 1 | −0.12 | −0.42; 0.18 | 0.06 | −0.24; 0.36 | 0.04 | −0.26; 0.33 | 0.02 |
| Model 1 | 1 | −0.13 | −0.40; 0.13 | −0.30 | −0.57; −0.04 | −0.51 | −0.78; −0.24 | 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1 | −0.21 | −0.48; 0.06 | −0.31 | −0.58; −0.04 | −0.59 | −0.87; −0.31 | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1 | −0.18 | −0.45; 0.09 | −0.23 | −0.50; 0.04 | −0.46 | −0.74; −0.18 | <0.001 |
| Model 4 | 1 | −0.17 | −0.44; 0.10 | −0.22 | −0.49; 0.05 | −0.43 | −0.71; −0.15 | <0.001 |
Model 1 adjusted for age, gender, urbanization index, marital status, work status, and education levels; model 2 adjusted for BMI, alcohol drinking, smoking status, and model 1. Model 3 adjusted for survey year and model 2, model 4 adjusted for hypertension, diabetes, and model 3.
Figure 2Interaction between dietary pattern and hypertension in relation to cognitive function. After adjusted for age, gender, urbanization index, marital status, work status, education levels, BMI, alcohol drinking, smoking status, diabetes and survey year. P-value for interaction: (1) Traditional Chinese dietary pattern: p = 0.07 for global cognitive scores, p = 0.15 for verbal memory scores; (2) Protein-rich dietary pattern: p = 0.43 for global cognitive scores, p = 0.32 for verbal memory scores; (3) Starch-rich dietary pattern: p = 0.05 for global cognitive scores, p = 0.10 for verbal memory scores.
Coefficients (95% CI) for cognitive function by quartiles of individual food intake for potential-rich and salted-vegetable dietary pattern.
| β | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fruit | 0 | 0.43 (0.14; 0.71) | – | – | <0.001 |
| Soy milk | 0 | 0.28 (-0.05; 0.62) | – | – | 0.01 |
| Milk | 0 | 1.16 (0.76; 1.55) | – | – | <0.001 |
| Deep fired product | 0 | −0.04 (-0.35; 0.27) | – | – | 0.12 |
| Eggs | 0 | 0.32 (-0.06; 0.69) | 0.88 (0.49; 1.26) | 1.06 (0.66; 1.46) | 0.001 |
| Fast food | 0 | 0.31 (-0.06; 0.69) | – | – | 0.59 |
| Cake | 0 | 0.29 (-0.05; 0.64) | – | – | 0.32 |
| Fungus | 0 | 0.53 (0.23; 0.83) | – | – | <0.001 |
| Shrimp | 0 | 0.37 (−0.01; 0.74) | – | – | 0.05 |
| Beer | 0 | 0.71 (0.04; 1.38) | – | – | 0.47 |
| Poultry | 0 | 0.67 (0.40; 0.94) | – | – | <0.001 |
| Nuts | 0 | 0.47 (0.17; 0.77) | – | – | 0.002 |
| Fruit | 0 | 0.03 (−0.17; 0.24) | – | – | 0.03 |
| Soy milk | 0 | 0.30 (0.05; 0.54) | – | – | <0.001 |
| Milk | 0 | 0.77 (0.48; 1.05) | – | – | <0.001 |
| Deep fired product | 0 | 0.15 (−0.07; 0.38) | – | – | 0.61 |
| Eggs | 0 | 0.14 (−0.13; 0.42) | 0.44 (0.16; 0.72) | 0.75 (0.46; 1.04) | 0.002 |
| Fast food | 0 | 0.07 (−0.20; 0.34) | – | – | 0.73 |
| Cake | 0 | 0.15 (−0.10; 0.39) | – | – | 0.25 |
| Fungus | 0 | 0.33 (0.12; 0.55) | <0.001 | ||
| Shrimp | 0 | 0.04 (−0.24; 0.31) | – | – | 0.19 |
| Beer | 0 | 0.11 (−0.37; 0.59) | – | – | 0.99 |
| Poultry | 0 | 0.19 (−0.01; 0.39) | – | – | 0.03 |
| Nuts | 0 | 0.08 (−0.14; 0.30) | – | – | 0.42 |
| Salted vegetables | 0 | −0.24 (−0.51; 0.03) | – | – | 0.01 |
| Legumes | 0 | −0.37 (−0.63; −0.11) | – | – | <0.001 |
| Whole grain | 0 | 0.09 (−0.18; 0.36) | – | – | 0.09 |
| Tubers | 0 | 0.14 (−0.23; 0.50) | −0.14 (−0.51; 0.24) | 0.14 (−0.23; 0.51) | 0.47 |
| Salted vegetables | 0 | −0.44 (−0.63; −0.25) | – | – | <0.001 |
| Legumes | 0 | −0.28 (−0.47; −0.10) | – | – | <0.001 |
| Whole grain | 0 | 1.11 (−0.09; 0.30) | – | – | 0.17 |
| Tubers | 0 | 0.16 (−0.10; 0.43) | 0.07 (−0.20; 0.35) | 0.22 (−0.05; 0.49) | 0.07 |
Adjusted for age, gender, urbanization index, marital status, work status, education levels, BMI, alcohol drinking, smoking status, survey year, hypertension and diabetes.