| Literature DB >> 30079316 |
Young-Ah Cho1, Do-Yeon Kim2, Ryowon Choue1,2, Hyunjung Lim1,2.
Abstract
The dietary behavior of immigrants starts changing upon their arrival in a new country. We evaluated changes in dietary quality of Vietnamese women immigrants in Korea and compared dietary quality with that of Korean women. Fifty-six Vietnamese women immigrants and 56 age-matched Korean women were recruited. Dietary quality were assessed using index of nutritional quality (INQ) and diet quality index-international (DQI-I). Dietary habits were assessed according to 4 dietary behaviors: a prudent, calorie control, dietary fat control, and sodium or salt control diet. DQI-I scores of Vietnamese immigrants decreased after immigration, especially the moderation score, although the variety score increased. Scores were significantly lower than those of Korean subjects (45.1 vs. 64.5; p < 0.001). Vietnamese women immigrants had significantly poorer nutrient balance and calorie intake control, although their fat and sodium control was better than that of Korean woman (p < 0.001). INQs of protein, niacin, phosphorus, iron, zinc were lower in immigrants who had lived longer in Korea than more recent immigrants (p < 0.05). Lower INQs of protein, fiber, vitamin A, B1, B6, C, folate, and phosphorus were related to higher body fat in Vietnamese immigrants (p < 0.05). In conclusion, dietary quality of Vietnamese immigrants decreased after migration, and dietary intake was inadequate compared with that of Korean women. In addition, diet quality of Vietnamese immigrants decreased with length of residence in Korea. There was a negative correlation between diet quality and body fat percent in Vietnamese women immigrants. Findings from this study may help improve diet quality and prevent obesity in Vietnam women immigrants.Entities:
Keywords: Body Fat; Immigrants; Nutritional Quality; Republic of Korea
Year: 2018 PMID: 30079316 PMCID: PMC6073174 DOI: 10.7762/cnr.2018.7.3.178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Nutr Res ISSN: 2287-3732
Socio-demographic characteristics and health related behaviors of Vietnamese women immigrants and Korean women
| Variables | Vietnamese women immigrants (n = 56) | Korean women (n = 56) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, yr | 26.8 ± 6.7 | 27.7 ± 5.5 | |
| Occupation† | |||
| Non (housewife) | 45 (80.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Labor | 11 (19.6) | 6 (10.7) | |
| Office worker | 0 (0.0) | 50 (89.2) | |
| Length of residence in Korea, yr | 2.3 ± 1.4 | - | |
| Level of linguistic competence (Korean) | - | ||
| Beginner | 9 (16.1) | ||
| Intermediate | 47 (83.9) | ||
| Fluent | 0 (0.0) | ||
| Household income† (USD/month) | 1,870 ± 374.3 | 3,035 ± 712.5 | |
| Living status | |||
| With husband's parents | 14 (25.0) | 14 (25.0) | |
| With husband and children | 42 (75.0) | 42 (75.0) | |
| Smoking | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Alcohol* | |||
| Non-drinker | 50 (89.3) | 42 (75.0) | |
| Current drinker | 6 (10.7) | 14 (25.0) | |
| Exercise | |||
| Yes | 9 (16.1) | 14 (25.0) | |
Values are means ± standard deviation or number (%).
Significantly different between groups by Student's t-test, and χ2 test for categorical variables at *p < 0.05, †p < 0.001.
Anthropometric measurements in Vietnamese women immigrants and Korean women
| Variables | Vietnamese women immigrants (n = 56) | Korean women (n = 56) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height, cm | 154.9 ± 5.6 | ||
| Weight, kg | 57.2 ± 8.7* | ||
| Change in body weight, kg§ | Δ5.1 ± 4.9 | - | |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 22.8 ± 2.8 | 22.2 ± 2.9 | |
| Weight status† | |||
| BMI < 18.5 | 3 (5.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
| 18.5 ≤ BMI < 23.0 | 26 (46.4) | 42 (75.0) | |
| 23.0 ≤ BMI | 27 (48.2) | 14 (25.0) | |
| Waist circumferences, cm | 70.2 ± 3.4‡ | ||
| Hip circumferences, cm | 88.5 ± 2.1‡ | ||
| WHR | 0.82 ± 0.03 | 0.79 ± 0.02‡ | |
| Body fat, % | 30.5 ± 3.7 | 28.0 ± 2.7‡ | |
Values are means ± standard deviation or number (%).
BMI, body mass index; WHR, waist to hip ratio.
Significantly different between groups by Student's t-test, and χ2 test for categorical variables at *p < 0.05, at †p < 0.01, ‡p < 0.001; §Changes in body weight before and after immigration were based on self-report.
Nutrient intake of Vietnamese women immigrants and Korean women
| Nutrient intakes | Vietnamese women immigrants (n = 56) | Korean women (n = 56) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy, kcal | 1,570.0 ± 223.6 | 1,664.7 ± 112.1 | |
| Carbohydrate, g | 250.7 ± 69.1 | 237.4 ± 32.5 | |
| Protein, g | |||
| Vegetable protein | 28.9 ± 8.1 | 36.3 ± 2.7† | |
| Animal protein | 30.8 ± 16.4 | 44.7 ± 15.9 | |
| Fat, g | |||
| Vegetable fat | 9.9 ± 4.1 | 18.5 ± 2.5† | |
| Animal fat | 24.9 ± 16.4 | 24.1 ± 5.0 | |
| C:P:F ratio§ | 63.8:15.2:20.0 | 57.0:19.4:23.0 | |
| Cholesterol, mg | 171.7 ± 93.2 | 328.3 ± 159.4* | |
| Vitamin A (µg RE) | 429.7 ± 230.0 | 897.3 ± 110.0‡ | |
| Vitamin B1, mg | 1.0 ± 0.5 | 1.5 ± 0.5 | |
| Vitamin B2, mg | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | |
| Vitamin B6, mg | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 2.3 ± 0.3* | |
| Niacin, mg | 14.8 ± 5.4 | 17.9 ± 4.8 | |
| Folate (µg) | 149.5 ± 37.1 | 206.6 ± 22.4* | |
| Calcium, g | |||
| Vegetable calcium | 185.8 ± 51.9 | 292.6 ± 18.6‡ | |
| Animal calcium | 111.5 ± 97.4 | 112.4 ± 47.2 | |
| Na, mg | 3,210.3 ± 918.6 | 4,361.1 ± 733.7* | |
| K, mg | 1,765.1 ± 390.0 | 2,692.8 ± 297.2* | |
| Fiber, g | 13.1 ± 2.8 | 20.1 ± 0.8‡ | |
| Vitamin C, mg | 50.4 ± 21.2 | 99.9 ± 31.5* | |
| Vitamin E, mg | 7.6 ± 2.7 | 12.6 ± 1.3‡ | |
Values are means ± standard deviation.
Significantly different between Vietnamese women immigrants and Korean women subjects by Student's t-test at *p < 0.05, †p < 0.01, and ‡p < 0.001; §Carbohydrate:protein:fat ratio.
Dietary quality of Vietnamese women before and after immigration and that of Korean women
| Variables | Vietnamese women before immigration (n = 56) | Vietnamese women after immigration (n = 56) | Korean women (n = 56) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DQI-I¶ (score/100) | 48.6 ± 1.4 | 45.1 ± 8.2§ | 64.5 ± 8.4† | |
| Variety (score/20) | 8.7 ± 0.8 | 10.2 ± 4.9‡ | 16.2 ± 1.3† | |
| Adequacy (score/40) | 10.2 ± 1.1 | 10.5 ± 3.5 | 20.0 ± 6.1† | |
| Moderation (score/30) | 29.4 ± 1.7 | 23.7 ± 3.8∥ | 24.7 ± 3.2 | |
| Overall balance (score/10) | 0.2 ± 0.6 | 0.6 ± 1.3 | 3.5 ± 0.8† | |
| INQ | ||||
| Energy | 0.6 ± 0.7 | 0.7 ± 0.1∥ | 0.9 ± 0.1† | |
| Protein | 1.1 ± 0.04 | 1.3 ± 0.3∥ | 1.8 ± 0.3† | |
| Fiber | 0.4 ± 0.01 | 0.5 ± 0.1∥ | 0.8 ± 0.6† | |
| Vitamin A | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 0.7 ± 0.3∥ | 1.4 ± 0.1† | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 1.1 ± 0.4∥ | 1.3 ± 0.4* | |
| Niacin | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.4∥ | 1.2 ± 0.3* | |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 1.4 ± 0.5∥ | 2.0 ± 0.1† | |
| Folate | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 0.4 ± 0.1∥ | 0.5 ± 0.1† | |
| Vitamin C | 0.4 ± 0.01 | 0.5 ± 0.2§ | 0.9 ± 0.2† | |
| Calcium | 0.2 ± 0.01 | 0.4 ± 0.2∥ | 0.6 ± 0.1† | |
| Phosphorus | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.2∥ | 1.5 ± 0.2† | |
| Iron | 0.5 ± 0.03 | 0.7 ± 0.1∥ | 0.9 ± 0.1† | |
| Zinc | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.2∥ | 1.1 ± 0.2† | |
Values are means ± standard deviation.
DQI-I, diet quality index-international; INQ, index of nutritional quality.
Significantly different between Vietnamese women immigrants and Korean women by Student's t-test at *p < 0.01 and †p < 0.001; Significantly different before and after immigration among Vietnamese women by Student's t-test at ‡p < 0.05, §p < 0.01, and ∥p < 0.001; ¶DQI-I scores are the sum of the 4 categories used to assess diet quality; 0 (poor diet quality)–100 (excellent diet quality).
Diet diversity and dietary habits of Vietnamese women before and after immigration and that of Korean women
| Variables | Vietnamese women before immigration (n = 56) | Vietnamese women after immigration (n = 56) | Korean women (n = 56) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDS‡ (score/5) | 3.9 ± 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.6* | 3.7 ± 0.4 | |
| 5 | 3 (5.4) | 6 (10.7) | 6 (10.7) | |
| 4 | 49 (87.5) | 32 (57.1) | 38 (67.9) | |
| 3 | 4 (7.1) | 18 (32.1) | 12 (21.4) | |
| GMVDF§ | ||||
| 11111 | 3 (5.4) | 6 (10.7) | 6 (10.7) | |
| 11110 | 0 (0.0) | 9 (16.1) | 0 (0.0) | |
| 11101 | 49 (87.5) | 23 (41.1) | 38 (67.9) | |
| 11100 | 4 (7.1) | 18 (32.1) | 12 (21.4) | |
| Dietary habits∥ | ||||
| Prudent diet | - | 22.5 ± 1.2 | 14.0 ± 1.4† | |
| Calorie control | - | 15.5 ± 1.1 | 11.0 ± 2.5† | |
| Fat control | - | 10.4 ± 1.6 | 12.2 ± 2.9† | |
| Sodium control | - | 6.2 ± 1.1 | 6.9 ± 1.7* | |
Values are means ± standard deviation or number (%).
DDS, dietary diversity score; GMVDF, grain, meat, vegetables, dairy, fruit.
Significantly different between Vietnamese women immigrants and Korean women subjects by Student's t-test at *p < 0.05 and †p < 0.001; ‡DDS: Dietary diversity score counts the number of food groups consumed daily from major 5 food groups (grain, meat, vegetable, dairy, fruit); §1: Food group is present, 0: Food group is absent, i.e., GMVDF = 11111 donates that all 5 food groups are present; ‖Dietary habit assessed a questionnaire that involves 4 key dietary factors: prudent dietary habits reflecting general nutrition balance; calorie control dietary habits related to weight loss and gain; fat control dietary habits reflecting moderation of cholesterol in the diet; sodium or salt control dietary habits, which affect blood pressure. Score are ranging from 6 (excellent) to 24 (very poor). As dietary habits were not assessed for Vietnamese women before migration, it could not compared before and after migration.
Figure 1Index of nutritional quality of Vietnamese women immigrants according to length of residence in Korea. Immigrants were classified into 3 groups based on length of residence in Korea: short length group, ≤ 1 year; medium length group, 2–3 years, long length group, ≥ 4 years.
ANOVA, analysis of variance.
Significantly different among groups by ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test at *p < 0.05, †p < 0.01, and ‡p < 0.001; Superscript uppercase letters indicate values that were significantly different between groups (p < 0.05).
Correlations between INQ and percent body fat among Vietnamese women immigrants
| INQ | Correlation coefficient (γ) | p value* |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | −0.087 | 0.359 |
| Protein | ||
| Fiber | ||
| Vitamin A | ||
| Vitamin B1 | ||
| Niacin | −0.153 | 0.107 |
| Vitamin B6 | ||
| Folate | ||
| Vitamin C | ||
| Calcium | −0.036 | 0.703 |
| Phosphorus | ||
| Iron | −0.116 | 0.223 |
| Zinc | −0.125 | 0.188 |
INQ, index of nutritional quality.
*Pearson correlation analyses was conducted between variables. Boldface p values indicate significance at p < 0.05.