Literature DB >> 30079129

Ectopic expression of the osteogenic master gene RUNX2 in melanoma.

Maria Teresa Valenti1, Luca Dalle Carbonare2, Monica Mottes3.   

Abstract

The transcription factor RUNX2 is the osteogenic master gene expressed in mesenchymal stem cells during osteogenic commitment as well as in pre-osteoblasts and early osteoblasts. However, RUNX2 is also ectopically expressed in melanoma and other cancers. Malignant melanoma (MM) is a highly metastatic skin cancer. The incidence of MM has increased considerably in the past half-century. The expression levels and mutation rates of genes such as BRAF, KIT, NRAS, PTEN, P53, TERT and MITF are higher in melanoma than in other solid malignancies. Additionally, transcription factors can affect cellular processes and induce cellular transformation since they control gene expression. Recently, several studies have identified alterations in RUNX2 expression. In particular, the regulation of KIT by RUNX2 and the increased expression of RUNX2 in melanoma specimens have been shown. Melanocytes, whose transformation results in melanoma, arise from the neural crest and therefore show "stemness" features. RUNX2 plays an important role in the re-activation of the MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathways, thus endowing melanoma cells with a high metastatic potential. In melanoma, the most frequent metastatic sites are the lung, liver, brain and lymph nodes. In addition, bone metastatic melanoma has been described. Notably, studies focusing on RUNX2 may contribute to the identification of an appropriate oncotarget in melanoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone; Epitelial mesenchymal transition; Melanoma; Mesenchymal stem cells; RUNX2

Year:  2018        PMID: 30079129      PMCID: PMC6068731          DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v10.i7.78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Stem Cells        ISSN: 1948-0210            Impact factor:   5.326


Core tip: In addition to its physiological expression in osteogenic cells, RUNX2 ectopic expression is also reported in several cancers. Melanoma cells, which arise from the neural crest, are not typical epithelial cells and exhibit “stemness” features. For this reason the epithelial mesenchymal transition process may be enhanced in melanoma cells. RUNX2 expression in such context increases the migration and invasiveness of melanoma cells; it can therefore be considered a new oncotarget in melanoma.

INTRODUCTION

In recent times, the incidence of malignant melanoma (MM) has increased. The increased number of MM patients may be ascribed to lifestyle and environmental changes. Unfortunately, the mortality rate of MM is very high, as MM is highly metastatic and genetically resistant to apoptosis. The surgical treatment of skin lesions before cell spreading is considered a successful therapeutic approach. However, after metastasis and dissemination of cells has occurred, the therapeutic tools are limited. Despite an initial positive response to treatment, melanoma cells become resistant to chemotherapy[1]. Many studies performed in animal models and in cell culture have identified the complex mechanism involved in the metastatic progression of melanoma. Mutations in master transcription regulators such as BRAF, KIT, NRAS, PTEN, P53, TERT, and MITF have been found frequently[2]. In particular, the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) is an important oncogene, and it plays a critical role in melanoma transformation due to its role in melanocyte proliferation and differentiation[3]. However, transcription factors in general may affect cellular processes and thereby induce cellular transformation. Among them, RUNX2, the master gene of osteogenic differentiation, has been shown to be involved in the transformation and metastatic progression of melanoma[4-6]. RUNX2, together with RUNX1 and RUNX3, belongs to the RUNT-related gene family[7]. These heterodimeric transcription factors have a DNA-binding “A” subunit and a non-DNA binding “B” subunit. The genomic and cDNA structures of the RUNT family members are evolutionarily conserved[8]. RUNX2 is located on human chromosome 6; its coding sequence is organized in eight exons and controlled by two promoters. Isoforms may originate by the alternative use of promoters or by the alternative splicing of exons; however, the DNA-binding domain remains invariant[7]. RUNX2 induces the commitment of mesenchymal stem cells to the osteogenic lineage by acting either as a monomer or as a heterodimeric complex, which shows a higher DNA binding activity[7]. Interestingly, differences in RUNX2 expression are associated with the skeletal differences between modern humans and Neanderthals[9]. Otto et al[10] using an in vivo model, showed that the ossification process is lacking in RUNX2 KO mice. RUNX2 is expressed not only in mesenchymal stem cells to commit these cells to osteogenic differentiation but also in pre-osteoblasts and early osteoblasts. It is then downregulated, as its continuous expression would prevent osteoblast maturation. This aspect is important for bone remodelling. In acromegaly patients, who are characterized by an excessive production of GH and IGF-1, a high fracture risk occurs; we have demonstrated that RUNX2 gene overexpression induces bone loss and impairs bone remodelling in these patients[11].

RUNX2 OVEREXPRESSION IN CANCER

The RUNX family members are frequently deregulated in human cancer. Runx proteins are involved in critical cellular processes such DNA repair, apoptosis, hypoxia, the inflammatory response, EMT, stem cell functions, and oncogene-induced senescence, and they interact with different signalling pathways such as the RAS-ERK, WNT, TGFβ, BMP and Notch pathways[12]. In addition, RUNX2 is involved in osteolytic diseases, neoangiogenic processes, and invasion and metastasis of solid tumours[4]. RUNX2 can be associated with HDA6 and can thereby prevent the pro-apoptotic activity of P53 through its deacetylation[13]. RUNX2 is ectopically expressed in several solid tumours such as breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer, and ovarian epithelial cancer; therefore, we have proposed RUNX2 as a mesenchymal stem marker for cancer[14,15]. Interestingly, we observed higher levels of RUNX2 expression in cancer patients with bone metastases compared to patients without bone metastases[15]. In thyroid cancer patients, we observed higher expression of RUNX2 in cancer tissue as well as in circulating mRNA compared to those levels of RUNX2 expression in controls[16]. In addition, RUNX2 expression was higher in cancer patients with microcalcifications compared to patients without microcalcifications[16]. Finally, it has been reported that RUNX2 induces its target genes SDF-1, CXCR7 and BSP, promoting bone homing[17].

RUNX2 IN MELANOMA

Ectopic expression of RUNX2 in melanoma tissue and in melanoma cell lines has been shown to be associated with bone sialoprotein (BSP)[18]. BSP has been associated with tumour invasiveness[18]. RUNX2 also regulates several matrix metalloproteinases that are involved in melanoma progression; therefore, RUNX2 may be regarded as a common regulator of both BSP and metalloproteinases[19]. This finding could also explain the expression of other bone proteins, such as osteopontin and osteocalcin, in melanoma[20,21]. TGFβ, which induces metastasis formation in advanced melanoma stages[22], can upregulate the expression of RUNX2 in melanoma cell lines[23]. In contrast, the tumour suppressor p14ARF reduces RUNX2 expression[24]. Loss-of-function p14ARF mutations lead to increased expression of RUNX2 and melanoma progression[24]. Ectopic expression of RUNX2 in melanoma has been associated with invasiveness; it has been demonstrated that RUNX2 overexpression mediates the migration ability of melanoma cells[6]. Notably RUNX2 stimulates VEGF gene expression[25] and the upregulation of angiogenesis, consequent to RUNX2 overexpression, may represent a critical step for tumor metastasis. Furthermore, RUNX2 overexpression upregulates SOX9, SNAI2 and SMAD3. These transcription factors are involved in EMT as well as in cytoskeletal remodelling and thus enhance the motility and invasive potential of cancer cells[17]. In melanoma, the overexpression of EGF-R, PDGFRβ, AXL and IGF-1R induces the reactivation of the MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathways, which are involved in migration and invasion processes[26]. The reactivation of these pathways is due to tyrosine kinase receptor-based autocrine loops, in which RUNX2 plays a pivotal role[5]. The MAPK and AKT pathways regulate most physiological processes, such as proliferation, differentiation and cell survival. It has been suggested that the MAPK and AKT pathways are strongly associated with each other in melanoma; the link between the PI3K/AKT (AKT pathway) and MAPK/ERK1/2 (MAPK pathway) cascades is well known[27]. AKT enhances RUNX2 expression either directly or by inactivating RUNX2 regulators. Similarly, RUNX2 activates the PI3K/AKT pathway by regulating different components[4]. This reciprocal activation induces tumour progression and aggressiveness. In addition, RUNX2 promotes the crosstalk between MAPK and AKT through EGFR, as has been shown in human mammary epithelial cells[28] through the reduction of ERK-mediated inhibition of EGFR and the AKT pathway. The lung, liver, brain and lymph nodes are the most frequent metastatic sites for melanoma cells[29]. Since melanocytes arise from the neural crest, they are not typical epithelial cells; they show “stemness” features. This last finding could partially explain the high metastatic potential of melanoma[29]. Solid malignancies such as breast, prostate and lung cancers form metastases in bone. However, metastatic bone diseases from MM are under-investigated. The data in the literature report an incidence of skeletal metastases in MM patients that ranges from 0.85% to 18.6%[30]. Recently, Zekri et al[31], managing MM patients at two referral cancer centres in England, showed that bone metastases occur in 4.1% of patients at all stages of MM. In addition, another study showed that 17.2% of metastatic melanoma patients had metastases in bone tissue.

CONCLUSION

MM accounts for less than 5% of cutaneous malignancies. However, its incidence has been increasing considerably in the past half-century. Therefore, extensive research focusing on the genes involved in melanoma transformation and on the modulation of these genes is needed. Several studies have highlighted the involvement of RUNX2, the master gene of osteogenic differentiation, in melanoma. The invasiveness and metastatic features conferred by RUNX2 seem to be related to its ability to promote EMT. In addition, melanocytes are not typical epithelial cells, and their stemness features could explain melanoma invasiveness. Since metastatic melanoma has a poor prognosis, new and more effective therapeutic tools should be developed in order to implement current therapies. In this context, the exploitation of molecules actually involved in melanoma, such as RUNX2, represents an important frontier for the identification of new oncotargets. Transcription factors have been ignored thus far by the pharmaceutical industry; nonetheless, many studies have identified their central role in cellular transformation. We believe that future efforts directed towards unravelling the complex roles of RUNX2 may contribute to the identification of new therapeutic tools that improve the quality of life of melanoma patients.
  31 in total

1.  Gene expression profiling in melanoma identifies novel downstream effectors of p14ARF.

Authors:  Leisl M Packer; Sandra J Pavey; Glen M Boyle; Mitchell S Stark; Ana L Ayub; Helen Rizos; Nicholas K Hayward
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Upstream and downstream targets of RUNX proteins.

Authors:  Florian Otto; Michael Lübbert; Michael Stock
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 4.429

3.  Role of Runx2 in crosstalk between Mek/Erk and PI3K/Akt signaling in MCF-10A cells.

Authors:  Manish Tandon; Zujian Chen; Jitesh Pratap
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.429

4.  Fyn is induced by Ras/PI3K/Akt signaling and is required for enhanced invasion/migration.

Authors:  Vipin Yadav; Mitchell F Denning
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 4.784

5.  Tissue specific regulation of VEGF expression during bone development requires Cbfa1/Runx2.

Authors:  E Zelzer; D J Glotzer; C Hartmann; D Thomas; N Fukai; S Soker; B R Olsen
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.882

Review 6.  Transcription factor Runx2 and its application to bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Luca Dalle Carbonare; Giulio Innamorati; Maria Teresa Valenti
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.739

7.  Runx2 mRNA expression in the tissue, serum, and circulating non-hematopoietic cells of patients with thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Luca Dalle Carbonare; Anna Frigo; Giuseppe Francia; Maria Vittoria Davì; Luca Donatelli; Chiara Stranieri; Paolo Brazzarola; Maria Chiara Zatelli; Fabio Menestrina; Maria Teresa Valenti
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Coexpression of bone sialoprotein (BSP) and the pivotal transcriptional regulator of osteogenesis, Cbfa1/Runx2, in malignant melanoma.

Authors:  M Riminucci; A Corsi; K Peris; L W Fisher; S Chimenti; P Bianco
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Runx2 transcriptome of prostate cancer cells: insights into invasiveness and bone metastasis.

Authors:  Sanjeev K Baniwal; Omar Khalid; Yankel Gabet; Ruchir R Shah; Daniel J Purcell; Deepak Mav; Alice E Kohn-Gabet; Yunfan Shi; Gerhard A Coetzee; Baruch Frenkel
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 27.401

10.  Computational Modeling of PI3K/AKT and MAPK Signaling Pathways in Melanoma Cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Pappalardo; Giulia Russo; Saverio Candido; Marzio Pennisi; Salvatore Cavalieri; Santo Motta; James A McCubrey; Ferdinando Nicoletti; Massimo Libra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Genome-wide CRISPR knockout screening identified G protein pathway suppressor 2 as a novel tumor suppressor for uveal melanoma metastasis.

Authors:  Shuangshuang Shi; Haojie Chen; Hanqing Wang; JianFeng Wan; Yi Shi; Jia Li; Shuo Wang; Jie Shi; Jianying Lv; Tong Wu; Longlong Wang; Fengyuan Sun
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 4.322

2.  Runx2 stimulates neoangiogenesis through the Runt domain in melanoma.

Authors:  Daniela Cecconi; Jessica Brandi; Marcello Manfredi; Michela Serena; Luca Dalle Carbonare; Michela Deiana; Samuele Cheri; Francesca Parolini; Alberto Gandini; Giulia Marchetto; Giulio Innamorati; Francesco Avanzi; Franco Antoniazzi; Emilio Marengo; Natascia Tiso; Monica Mottes; Donato Zipeto; Maria Teresa Valenti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  HDACs control RUNX2 expression in cancer cells through redundant and cell context-dependent mechanisms.

Authors:  Gloria Manzotti; Federica Torricelli; Benedetta Donati; Valentina Sancisi; Mila Gugnoni; Alessia Ciarrocchi
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-08

4.  Effect of estradiol on high glucose‑induced osteoblast injury.

Authors:  Guangrun Li; Xiaofeng Jiang; Liping Liu; Xiaoyang Liu; Hongtao Liu; Zuofu Zhang
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 2.952

5.  BEL β-Trefoil Reduces the Migration Ability of RUNX2 Expressing Melanoma Cells in Xenotransplanted Zebrafish.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Valenti; Giulia Marchetto; Massimiliano Perduca; Natascia Tiso; Monica Mottes; Luca Dalle Carbonare
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Effect of AKT silence on malignant biological behavior of renal cell carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Zuan Li; DeYong Nong; Bincai Li; Haojian Wang; Chunlin Li; Zhi Chen; Ximing Li; Guihai Huang; Junhao Lin; Nan Hao; Wei Li
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 2.090

7.  A Potential Role of RUNX2- RUNT Domain in Modulating the Expression of Genes Involved in Bone Metastases: An In Vitro Study with Melanoma Cells.

Authors:  Michela Deiana; Luca Dalle Carbonare; Michela Serena; Samuele Cheri; Simona Mutascio; Alberto Gandini; Giulio Innamorati; Pamela Lorenzi; Michela Cumerlato; Jessica Bertacco; Franco Antoniazzi; Maria Grazia Romanelli; Monica Mottes; Donato Zipeto; Maria Teresa Valenti
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 6.600

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.