| Literature DB >> 30079025 |
Wenting Li1, Hao Wu1, Chong Gao1, Dan Yang2, Depo Yang3, Jiangang Shen1.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neuroinflammatory disease in central nervous system (CNS) without effective treatment or medication yet. With high prevalence of MS patients worldwide and poor therapeutic outcome, seeking novel therapeutic strategy for MS is timely important. Radix Rehmanniae (RR), a typical Chinese Medicinal herb, has been used for neuroinflammatory diseases in Traditional Chinese Medicine for centuries. However, scientific evidence and underlying mechanisms of RR for MS are unclear. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that RR could attenuate the progress and severity of MS via suppressing macrophage-derived nitrative damage and inflammation by using experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model for mimicking MS pathology. The results showed the RR treatment effectively ameliorated clinical disease severity, inhibited inflammation/demyelination in spinal cord, and alleviated CNS infiltration of encephalitogenic T cells and activated macrophages. Meanwhile, RR possessed bioactivities of scavenging ONOO- and reducing the expression of iNOS and NADPH oxidases in the spinal cords of the EAE mice. Furthermore, RR treatment suppressed nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling pathway in the splenocytes of EAE mice. The in vitro experiments on macrophages and neuronal cells exerted consistent results with the in vivo animal experiments. Taken together, we conclude that Radix Rehmanniae extract has therapeutic values for ameliorating EAE/MS pathological process and disease severity and its underlying mechanisms are associated with anti-inflammation and inhibiting macrophage-derived nitrative damages. Further study could yield novel promising therapeutic agent for multiple sclerosis.Entities:
Keywords: (NF-κB) signaling pathway; Radix Rehmanniae; macrophage; multiple sclerosis; nitrative damage
Year: 2018 PMID: 30079025 PMCID: PMC6062770 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Representative chromatograms of RR extract analyzed on LCMS-IT-TOF. (A) UV chromatogram at 210 nm; (B) Total negative iron chromatogram; (C) Total positive iron chromatogram.
Compounds identified in RR extract.
| 1 | 13.04 | 361.1158 | 407.1190 | 361.1139; 199.0627; 169.0500; 384.9359; | C15H22O10 | Catalpol |
| 2 | 14.56 | 397.0922 | 443.0969 | 365.1044; 316.9483; 297.1224 | C15H23ClO10 | Glutinoside |
| 3 | 23.50 | 397.0943 | 443.0945 | 341.1098; 316.9469; 226.9778; 112.9907 | C28H14O3 | 2-(Dibenzo[ghi,mno]fluoranthen-1-ylcarbonyl) benzoic acid |
| 4 | 27.99 | 361.1171 | 326.1234; 316.9459; 112.9856 | C15H22O10 | Danmelittoside | |
| 5 | 31.37 | 685.2181 | 731.2267 | 384.92297; 248.9549; 263.0779; 341.1154; | C27H42O20 | Rehmannioside D |
| 6 | 31.69 | 435.2243 | 389.1928 | 319.0780; 183.1034; 215.0819; 112.9959 | C20H36O10 | Rehmaionoside A/Rehmaionoside B |
| 7 | 33.70 | 523.1702 | 569.1709 | 523.1702; 463.1343 | C21H32O15 | Melittoside |
| 8 | 35.22 | 345.1554 | 367.1360; 265.1019; 165.0924; 248.9601; | C16H26O8 | Rehmapicroside | |
| 9 | 38.68 | 347.1311 | 393.1404 | 347.1351; 167.0743; 149.0667; 248.9611; | C15H24O9 | Leonuride or isomer |
| 10 | 40.60 | 373.1148 | 318.7710; 316.9545; 248.9636; 113.0061 | C16H22O10 | Geniposidic acid | |
| 11 | 43.63 | 461.1664 | 315.1091; 397.1125; 204.963; 154.9775 | C20H30O12 | Decaffeoyl-verbascoside | |
| 12 | 53.55 | 375.1295 | 213.0715; 169.0923; 103.9678; 131.7047; | C16H24O10 | 8-Epiloganic acid | |
| 13 | 58.85 | 451.2147 | 391.0532; 293.0553; 277.0559; 226.9850; | C27H32O6 | 28-Deoxonimbolide | |
| 14 | 61.54 | 785.2529 | 623.2172; 461.1685; 315.1005; 477.1517; | C35H46O20 | Purpureaside C/Echinacoside | |
| 15 | 64.11 | 389.2192 | 435.2237 | 389.2192; 161.0542; 179.0726; 248.9595; | C20H36O10 | Rehmaionoside A/Rehmaionoside B |
| 16 | 64.78 | 799.2666 | 623.2188; 461.1619; 248.9573; 703.1678; | C36H48O20 | Cistanoside A/Jionoside A1/Jionoside A2 | |
| 17 | 67.75 | 623.1975 | 461.1660; 384.9374; 315.1066; 315.1115; | C29H36O15 | Acteoside | |
| 18 | 68.12 | 813.2823 | 637.2318; 623.2012; 461.1617; 659.2773; | C37H50O20 | Jionoside B1/Jionoside B2 | |
| 19 | 69.21 | 623.1973 | 461.1660; 384.9380; 315.1153 | C29H36O15 | Isoacteoside/Forsythoside A | |
| 20 | 70.89 | 637.2136 | 461.1669; 452.9183; 248.9533; 316.9483 | C30H38O15 | Jionoside D/Leucosceptoside A/Leucosceptoside | |
| 21 | 72.29 | 523.1822 | 452.9175; 316.9470; 248.9533; 193.0507; | C25H32O12 | 6-O-E-Feruloylajugol | |
| 22 | 74.25 | 651.2309 | 457.1848; 384.9551; 520.9061; 383.9357; | C31H40O15 | Martynoside/Martynoside isomer | |
| 23 | 78.48 | 535.2542 | 452.9211; 349.1507; 238.7846; 248.9545; | C28H40O10 | Strophanthidin arabinoside | |
| 24 | 77.89 | 329.2324 | 313.1670; 267.1626; 211.1375; 171.0987 | C18H34O5 | Octadecenoic acid |
Figure 2RR ameliorated active EAE via inhibiting inflammation and demyelination. Mice were administrated via p.o. with vehicle (n = 8) or RR (n = 8–10) daily starting from day of EAE induction (A) or disease onset (C). Accumulative clinical scores of prevention protocol (B) or treatment protocol (D) for up till 30 dpi were calculated. Spinal cords from normal mice or EAE mice treated with vehicle or RR were obtained at 30 dpi (treatment protocol) and stained by H&E (E) and Luxol Fast Blue (LFB) (F) (scale bar, 100 μm). (G) Pathology scores of inflammation and demyelination are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 4), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Clinical features of EAE in mice in the administration of vehicle or RR.
| Vehicle | 100 | 3.38 ± 0.23 | 100 | 3.07 ± 0.189 | 12.29 ± 0.79 |
| RR | 100 | 2.44 ± 0.68 | 90 | 1.72 ± 0.22 | 14.89 ± 0.35 |
Mean ± SEM
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01.
Figure 3RR decreased the populations of CD3 + and CD11b + cells in active EAE. MNCs were isolated from brain or spinal cord in RR or vehicle-treated EAE mice at 30 dpi (treatment protocol). (A) Cells were analyzed for expression of CD3 or CD4 in the lymphocyte gate and that of CD11b in total MNC gate by flow cytometry. CD11b+ CD45high cell was defined as macrophage, CD11b+ CD45int as active microglia and CD11b+ CD45low as resident microglia. Percentages of positive cells in brain (B) or spinal cord (C) are represented (n = 4). (D) Immunofluorescent co-staining of CD3+(green) and CD11b+(red) cells with nucleus (blue) in spinal cord (left) and brain (near choroid plexus within lateral ventricle, right) at 30 dpi (scale bar, 50 μm). *P < 0.05, *P < 0.01.
Figure 4RR reduced ONOO− production in active EAE spinal cord. Spinal cords in normal mice and RR or vehicle-treated EAE mice (n = 3) at 18 dpi (treatment protocol) were obtained. ONOO− levels were detected using HKYellow-AM probe. (A) The immunofluorescent images of HKYellow-AM (red) and nucleus (blue) in spinal cord at 18 dpi (scale bar, 10 μm). Western blotting was conducted to analyze the expression of 3-NT (B) and iNOS, p67phox, p47phox (C).
Figure 5RR suppressed ONOO− generation by inhibiting NF-κB signaling both in vivo and in vitro. (A) Splenocytes from normal, RR-, or vehicle-treated EAE mice (n = 3) at 18 dpi (treatment protocol) were analyzed for the expression of p65 and phosphorylated IKKα/β, IκBα and p65 by western blot assay. Macrophage cell line, RAW264.7 was pre-incubated with RR (50 ug/mL) or sham for 1 h prior to LPS (1 ug/mL) challenge for 30 min (B–D). Western blotting was conducted to analyze the expressions of iNOS, p67phox, p47phox (B) and NF-κB signaling-associated proteins (C). The nuclear translocation of p65 was examined by immunofluorescent staining (D). Scale bar represented 5 μm.
Figure 6RR protected neurons from nitrative or inflammatory cytotoxicity in vitro. SH-SY5Y cells were pre-treated with RR extract (50 ug/mL) or sham for 1 h, followed by 500 μM ONOO− donor SIN-1 for 1 h. The expressions of 3-NT and Bax were analyzed by western blot analysis (A). ONOO− levels in SIN-1 stimulated SH-SY5Y cells were detected using HKYellow-AM probe by immunofluorescent assay (scale bar, 20 μm) (B). (C) The flow chart of SH-SY5Y cells under the challenge of conditioned medium (CM), mimicking inflammatory environments. Using MTT method, the viabilities of SH-SY5Y cell treated with different concentrations of RR were measured in CM or normal medium as control (D). ***P < 0.001.
Figure 7The diagram of potential mechanisms of RR in EAE treatment. In multiple sclerosis (MS), macrophage is activated by bacteria or viruses or other environmental stimuli, leading to the production of proinflammatory cytokines and free radicals via activation of NF-κB signaling pathway. Produced ROS/RNS directly destruct the structure of myelin sheath and neurons. On the one hand, in our study, RR could directly scavenge ONOO−, a representative RNS. On the other hand, RR also suppressed the production of ONOO− though inhibiting NF-κB signaling pathway.