Literature DB >> 30078873

Cutaneous Bacteriological Profile in Patients with Pemphigus.

K C Kiran1, J Madhukara2, Anil Abraham2, S Muralidharan3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pemphigus is an autoimmune blistering disease. The common cause of death in pemphigus is septicemia which is usually secondary to cutaneous bacterial infection. AIM: The aim was to study the cutaneous bacteriological profile in patients with pemphigus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pus for culture and sensitivity was collected from clinically infected lesions of pemphigus patients in the Department of Dermatology, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, from June 2013 to June 2014.
RESULTS: Of the 49 patients included in the study, 44 were suffering from pemphigus vulgaris, 4 from pemphigus foliaceus and one had pemphigus vegetans. There were 31 male and 18 female patients. The mean age of the group was 35.51 year. Mean Autoimmune Bullous Disorder Intensity Score was 17.36. About 32.7% were diabetic. About 40.81% showed the growth of Staphylococcus aureus, 12.24% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 6.12% of Proteus mirabilis, 4.08% of β-hemolytic streptococci and nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli, and 2.04% of Proteus vulgaris, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Enterococcus species, and Klebsiella species. S. aureus showed 100% sensitivity to antibiotics - tetracycline, amikacin, chloramphenicol, and netilmicin; 90% resistance was found for penicillin and 55% resistance was found for ciprofloxacin and erythromycin. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus was 30%. P. aeruginosa showed 100% sensitivity to ciprofloxacin, amikacin, gentamicin, piperacillin, piperacillin + tazobactam, and netilmicin.
CONCLUSION: S. aureus was the most common organism showing sensitivity to tetracycline, amikacin, chloramphenicol, and netilmicin and resistance to penicillin, ciprofloxacin, and erythromycin.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pemphigus; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Staphylococcus aureus

Year:  2018        PMID: 30078873      PMCID: PMC6052748          DOI: 10.4103/ijd.IJD_152_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Dermatol        ISSN: 0019-5154            Impact factor:   1.494


What was known? The most common cause of death in pemphigus is septicemia which is usually caused secondary to cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Introduction

Pemphigus is an autoimmune blistering disease involving the skin and mucous membrane. The term pemphigus was derived from the Greek word “pemphix” meaning bubble.[1] Pemphigus caused substantial mortality before the advent of steroids and antibiotic therapy. Steroids, immunosuppressive agents, and antibiotics have improved the prognosis.[2] The common cause of death in pemphigus patients is septicemia and pneumonia. Septicemia is usually secondary to cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infection.[3] S. aureus was the most common cause of cutaneous bacterial infection in cases of pemphigus.[234567] In the present study we tried to look into the cutaneous bacterial infection profile in pemphigus in this part of the country.

Materials and Methods

The present study was conducted in the Department of Dermatology, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, from June 2013 to June 2014 after due clearance from the Ethics Committee. A total of 49 patients of pemphigus confirmed by biopsy or immunofluorescence and/or Tzanck smear with clinically infected pemphigus lesions were selected. Informed consent was taken from all participants included in the study. All the patients in the study were subjected to pus for culture which were interpreted by the microbiologist. If there was growth of organism, then sensitivity pattern was conducted for the particular organism.

Statistical analysis

Data were compiled, tabulated and analyzed using the statistical software SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago). P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of the 49 patients studied, 31 were male and 18 were female. The age distribution of the patients varied from 7 to 62 years, with a mean age of 35.51 year. Majority of the patients (53.06%) were found to be between 16 and 30 year age group. Among the 49 patients, 32.7% were diabetics. Pemphigus vulgaris (44; 89.79%) [Figures 1 and 2] was the predominant type followed by pemphigus foliaceus (4; 8.16%) and the remaining one (2.04%) had been suffering from pemphigus vegetans. About 61.22% of patients had disease duration less than a year. The average Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS)[8] of the patients was 17.36. The number of patients with ABSIS of >10 was 39 and the rest 10 patients had ABSIS of ≤10.
Figure 1

A 26-year-old male patient of pemphigus vulgaris with erosions on the axilla with seropurulent discharge

Figure 2

A 40-year-old male patient of pemphigus vulgaris with erosion covered with whitish yellow slough on the back

A 26-year-old male patient of pemphigus vulgaris with erosions on the axilla with seropurulent discharge A 40-year-old male patient of pemphigus vulgaris with erosion covered with whitish yellow slough on the back Based on the culture report [Figure 3], S. aureus (40.81%) was the most common organism grown followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12.24%), Proteus mirabilis (6.12%), β-hemolytic streptococci (4.08%), nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) (4.08%), Proteus vulgaris (2.04%), Staphylococcus saprophyticus (2.04%), Enterococcus species (2.04%), Klebsiella species (2.04%), skin commensals (10.2%), and no growth (18.36%). Culture from two patients grew two organisms each. Twenty four patients (48.98%) showed Gram-positive growth and 13 (26.53%) showed Gram-negative growth.
Figure 3

Bacterial growth profile in patients with pemphigus

Bacterial growth profile in patients with pemphigus Twenty patients whose pus culture grew S. aureus showed 100% sensitivity to antibiotics – tetracycline, amikacin, chloramphenicol, and netilmicin. 95% and 70% sensitivity was found to gentamicin and cloxacillin + methicillin, respectively [Table 1]. However, resistance was noted predominantly to penicillin (90%), ciprofloxacin (55%), and erythromycin (55%).
Table 1

Staphylococcus aureus sensitivity pattern for various antibiotics

Staphylococcus aureus sensitivity pattern for various antibiotics P. aeruginosa showed 100% sensitivity to ciprofloxacin, amikacin, gentamicin, piperacillin + tazobactam, ceftazidime, and netilmicin [Table 2]. Three patients whose culture grew P. mirabilis showed 100% sensitivity to ampicillin/amoxicillin, amikacin, gentamicin, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and piperacillin. Patients with β-hemolytic streptococci growth were highly sensitive to penicillin, and cephalexin, however, was found to be resistant to erythromycin.
Table 2

Pseudomonas aeruginosa sensitivity pattern for various antibiotics

Pseudomonas aeruginosa sensitivity pattern for various antibiotics Nonfermenting GNB (e.g., Acinetobacter, Bordetella, Moraxella, Burkholderia, Legionella, or Stenotrophomonas) and Klebsiella species showed 100% resistance to ampicillin/amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, amikacin, gentamicin, piperacillin, piperacillin + tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and netilmicin, whereas P. aeruginosa was found to be sensitive to above-mentioned antibiotics. S. saprophyticus was sensitive to cloxacillin + methicillin, tetracycline, co-trimoxazole, gentamicin, vancomycin, and netilmicin but resistant to penicillin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, amikacin, and chloramphenicol. Enterococcus species was sensitive to penicillin, ampicillin, gentamicin, vancomycin, and teicoplanin. Percentage of patients on >15 mg of prednisolone or its equivalent harboring Gram-negative organisms (53.84%) was high when compared with the total patients (34.69%); however, this difference was not significant (P=0.17). There was a higher percentage of Gram-negative organism growth when the ABSIS was above 10 (30.76%) when compared to ABSIS ≤10 (10%), which is again not statistically significant (P=0.25).

Discussion

This study showed male predominance among pemphigus patients, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.72:1, which is comparable with previous studies. Sehgal[9] and Singh et al.[10] reported male predominance in their studies in a ratio of 3:1 and 3:2, respectively. The average age of pemphigus in this study was 35.61 year. This was in contrast to the world literature where initial manifestation was found to be more common in an age group ranging from 40 to 60 years.[1112] However, it was in accordance with the Indian literature, where a significant number of pemphigus patients were <40 year of age.[1314] In this study, pemphigus vulgaris was the most common type (89.79%), followed by pemphigus foliaceus (8.16%) and pemphigus vegetans (2.04%). Huda and Afsar[15] and Wilson et al.[11] studied Indian patients and reported that pemphigus vulgaris to be the most common type which was comparable with this study. However, Wilson et al.[11] reported that the prevalence of pemphigus vulgaris and foliaceus to be the same among Oxford, UK patients. According to this study, among 49 patients, 33 (67.3%) patients were nondiabetic and 16 (32.7%) were diabetic. In this study, S. aureus was the most common offender being found in 20 (40.81%) out of 49 patients. There were many studies that reported S. aureus as the most common organism to be encountered among pemphigus patients.[234567] Solanki et al.[2] and Abdullah et al.[4] found the growth of S. aureus to be 72% and 92.85%, respectively, whereas the growth was 82.9% and 93.7% in the study conducted by Qadim et al.[6] and Esmail et al.[7] Hence, in this study, percentage of patients with S. aureus growth was less compared to these studies. According to Abdullah et al.,[4] Enterobacteriaceae (35.71%) family was the most common organism after S. aureus. In this study, P. aeruginosa (12.24%) was the next most common organism after S. aureus followed by Enterobacteriaceae (10.2%), β-hemolytic streptococci (4.08%), nonfermenting GNB (4.08%), S. saprophyticus (2.04%), and Enterococcus species (2.04%). In this study, S. aureus recovered from the patients of pemphigus showed maximal sensitivity to tetracycline, amikacin, chloramphenicol, and netilmicin all 100% sensitive while gentamicin was 95% sensitive. According to Solanki et al., S. aureus showed maximal sensitivity to cloxacillin, cefotaxime, and lincomycin.[2] According to this study, S. aureus was highly resistant to penicillin (90%), erythromycin (55%), and ciprofloxacin (55%). A study, conducted by Esmail et al., found the following resistance pattern: penicillin (60%), cefazolin (40%), cephalexin (26.7%), ampicillin (20%), clindamycin (20%), vancomycin (13.3%), ceftriaxone (13.3%), and cefotaxime (6.7%).[7] The sensitivity pattern for P. aeruginosa to ciprofloxacin, amikacin, gentamicin, ceftazidime, netilmicin, piperacillin, and piperacillin + tazobactam was 100%. Solanki et al. found P. aeruginosa to be very sensitive to ciprofloxacin and sensitive to gentamicin, ceftazidime, and pefloxacin.[2] β-hemolytic streptococci showed 100% sensitivity to penicillin and cephalexin and showed 100% resistance to erythromycin. According to Solanki et al., β-hemolytic streptococci showed sensitivity to cephaloridine, gentamicin, amikacin, cloxacillin, lincomycin, cefotaxime, and quinolones.[2] P. mirabilis and P. vulgaris showed 100% sensitivity to the following antibiotics: ampicillin, amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, amikacin, gentamicin, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, cefuroxime, piperacillin, piperacillin + tazobactam, and netilmicin, whereas nonfermenting GNB and Klebsiella species were found resistant to above-mentioned antibiotics.

Conclusion

Even with the advancement in the effective treatment of pemphigus, infections and septicemia are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Changing bacterial profile and its antibiotic sensitivity need periodic updates. S. aureus was the most common organism showing sensitivity to tetracycline, amikacin, chloramphenicol, and netilmicin and resistance to penicillin, ciprofloxacin, and erythromycin. The next common offender was P. aeruginosa which was sensitive to ciprofloxacin, amikacin, gentamicin, ceftazidime, netilmicin, piperacillin, and piperacillin+tazobactam.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest. What is new? Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the second most common cause of cutaneous bacterial infection in pemphigus cases after Staphlyococcus aureus. Staphylococcus aureus is highly resistant to pencillin and sensitive to tetracycline, amikacin, chloramphenicol and netilmicin.
  12 in total

1.  Bacterial culture and sensitivity in pemphigus.

Authors:  R B Solanki; Y B Shah; A N Shah; V Jain
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 2.  Geoepidemiologic considerations of auto-immune pemphigus.

Authors:  N Meyer; L Misery
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 9.754

Review 3.  Pemphigus in India.

Authors:  Amrinder J Kanwar; Dipankar De
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Etiology of pyrexia in pemphigus patients: a dermatologist's enigma.

Authors:  Hamideh H Qadim; Alka Hasani; Bayat M Zinus; Nazila J Orang; Akbar Hasani
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Treatment of pemphigus: an Indian perspective.

Authors:  Amrinder J Kanwar; Keshavamurthy Vinay
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 6.  Pemphigus.

Authors:  N Korman
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 11.527

7.  Pemphigus in India. A note.

Authors:  V N Sehgal
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  A Clinicopathological Study of Pemphigus.

Authors:  Ratan Singh; R K Pandhi; Dharam Pal; Gyaneshwar Kalla
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol Venereol       Date:  1973 May-Jun

9.  Clinical and bacteriological profile and outcome of sepsis in dermatology ward in tertiary care center in New Delhi.

Authors:  D P Asati; V K Sharma; S Khandpur; G C Khilnani; A Kapil
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Death in pemphigus.

Authors:  A R Ahmed; R Moy
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 11.527

View more
  2 in total

1.  Features and associated factors of bacterial skin infections in hospitalized patients with pemphigus: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Furong Li; Yejun Wu; Wenjie Bian; Lei Huang; Xuejun Zhu; Xixue Chen; Mingyue Wang
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 2.  Pemphigus during the COVID-19 Epidemic: Infection Risk, Vaccine Responses and Management Strategies.

Authors:  Xueyi Huang; Xiaoqian Liang; Jiao Zhang; Hang Su; Yongfeng Chen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.